You don't say anything more and so I don't know how much do you know
of accessibility so far, but allow me to tell you that accessibility
goes far beyond the font size, there are problems most people don't even
imagine. By the way, I recommend you to use XHTML, as it will be easier
to
Vicki Stebbins wrote:
Have you done any CSS aimed at braille readers? If so is there some
'gotcha' with this? I'm thinking % divs for the navigation and the
layout is side nav so when the font resizes it can have more room to
move?
No, I haven't written CSS for braille.
My friend who
Hallo Brian...
On my Mac, it did it on Safari 2 as well (only once) as Firefox 2,
only on load mind. Once cached and refreshed, I don't see a repeat of
it.
In order to duplicate it, I need to shut down the browser and clear
the cache.
Tigdh
--
TAG
[EMAIL
At 7:02 AM +0200 9/5/07, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote: Georg:
I recommend body {font-size: 100%;}.
I've seen 100.1% stated -- is there any real advantage in doing that?
/* all values below are suggestions */
h1 {font-size: 145%;}
h2 {font-size: 132%;}
h3 {font-size: 125%;}
h4 {font-size: 115%;}
h5
It's like IE6 knew it was getting ignored and decided to rear its ugly
head and say, Don't forget about my 30% market share, you can't
abandon me and my exuberant fountain of undocumented rendering
errors!
This is another pro site. Note that I'm using an IE6 PNG fix to get
alpha transparency,
Fiona ha scritto:
(I apologise if this has come through a second time - but I think I sent it
from the wrong email address the first time.)
Hi,
I have trying for hours to sort the alignment of two unordered lists inside
a div but I must be missing something obvious.
I can't seem to get
I haven't done a new table-based layout in years. That said, we have two
key pages that are truly wire-frame in nature, by that I mean that the
individual cells of content vary substantially in size at each rendering
(based on database contents), and these variances in size need to adjust the
What is failing? Is it the vertical gray line on the right?
Alan K. Gay
www.buymetrics.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Brown
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2007 2:11 PM
To: CSS-Discuss
Subject: [css-d] Fixed Footer
Hi All
tedd wrote:
I've seen 100.1% stated -- is there any real advantage in doing that?
That slightly larger than 100% value was used to fix a bug in a few
old browser-versions - Opera amongst others IIRC.
Through testing I haven't found the need to fix any bugs that way in any
browser for the last
Hi all,
Just wanted to double-check my thinking here:
bottom right
or
right bottom
?
I always have done this (for example):
background: url(foo.jpg) no-repeat bottom right;
When using the the keywords, should I worry about which one comes first?
I know, silly question... just wanted to
The only problem I see on that is when you change into unit values,
since they are interpreted as (x, y), other than that it should work
('center center' has no problem with that). Still, I think you should
specify the position in their general order.
Just my 2c.
Micky Hulse wrote:
Hi Rafael, thanks for your reply -- I really appreciate you help on this
one. :)
Rafael wrote:
...snipage...
specify the position in their general order.
Great advice. I think I will start doing that.
IIRC, back when I first started learning CSS (using Dreamweaver MX),
DWMX would generate
Micky Hulse wrote:
I also had an excellent off-list reply:
[[
If at least one value is not a keyword, then the first value represents
the horizontal position and the second represents the vertical position.
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/colors.html#propdef-background-position
In other words,
Sorry for the previous mail, wrong keys combination :s
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
tedd wrote:
Here's an example of what I mean by zoom cooperative:
http://www.php1.net/b/speech/
Now only does this site zoom well (according to me), but it's part of
my new deliver content via speech
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
Rafael wrote:
By the way, I recommend you to use XHTML, as it will be easier to
parse for any software.
IE doesn't understand XHTML at all, and won't parse it unless we serve
it as broken HTML - or convert it into proper HTML.
Actually, it seems just the doctype is
From: Alan K. Gay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't know any way with CSS, absent a pile of JS, that changes in the
height of the contents of a block in column one can force, across all
browsers (or even just IE for that matter), a corresponding change in the
height of a block (div, for ex) that is
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rafael
Sent: 05 September 2007 17:30
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: css mailing list
Subject: Re: [css-d] [solved] Background shorthand: Quick question
Micky Hulse wrote:
I also had an excellent
I don't know what this is called - or if there is a solution to what I'm
seeing.
I'm using IE 6. I close my Favorites so it doesn't display on my screen.
There is a large gap between the menu going up and down and the edge of
my browser window. If I enable my Favorites and have them displaying on
Hi,
I am at a loss here.
IE6 is not showing a row of pictures, on any page ( these are click
through links
to sponsor websites).
IE7/FF/safari/opera (all on windows) show them correctly.
Can any body check they are there (may be a setting on my other pc
running IE6)
website:
At 7:50 PM -0300 9/2/07, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa wrote:
In other words, can pure CSS layouts do everything a table-based layout can
do?
So far we seem to have avoided an argument about whether
tables-based layouts are right or wrong, which is fantastic!
Let's all keep it that way. The
Peter wrote:
Hi,
I am at a loss here.
IE6 is not showing a row of pictures, on any page ( these are click
through links
to sponsor websites).
IE7/FF/safari/opera (all on windows) show them correctly.
Can any body check they are there (may be a setting on my other pc
running IE6)
Hi
On 04/09/07, Richard Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why won't this site work in IE6 please?
http://www.apbassettsolicitors.co.uk/
http://www.apbassettsolicitors.co.uk/wp-content/themes/bassetts/style.css
It works in all the other IEs.
I've borrowed(!) code from Georg and redone the site.
I think I may have misstated my problem in a previous email. I said
in the subject that it was a float issue. It isn't. I did something
tricky with widths and absolute/relative positioning. Now I have not
the first clue how to get it to work in IE6. Will someone please take
a look?
The URL:
Richard Brown wrote:
Hi
On 04/09/07, Richard Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why won't this site work in IE6 please?
http://www.apbassettsolicitors.co.uk/
http://www.apbassettsolicitors.co.uk/wp-content/themes/bassetts/style.css
It works in all the other IEs.
I've borrowed(!)
David Laakso wrote:
Richard Brown wrote:
Hi
On 04/09/07, Richard Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why won't this site work in IE6 please?
http://www.apbassettsolicitors.co.uk/
http://www.apbassettsolicitors.co.uk/wp-content/themes/bassetts/style.css
It works in all the other IEs.
On 5/9/07 (17:38) Rafael said:
But I wonder, if you include a doctype
(and your code is valid) how do you preserve the Quirks mode?
It's my understanding that including a doctype minus the URL will permit this.
--
Rick Lecoat
Eric A. Meyer wrote:
The focus on whether there are layout
types that are difficult or impossible to achieve in CSS is perfect
Just today I relented and, in the interests of time, put up a table
based layout for non-tabular data.
I wonder if someone has a good CSS solution for this table:
Rafael wrote:
...snip...
right?). It still sounds like an invitation to use the x y order :)
It sure does. :)
I definitely am a big fan of coding consistency... I will be using the
x y order from now on.
Thanks again Rafael! :)
Cheers,
Micky
--
Wishlist: http://tinyurl.com/22tgef
Nick Fitzsimons wrote:
...snip...
just units, rather than mixing them together: 0 23px, for example.
Ah, more great info Nick! Thanks! :)
I hope one of these days I can help you with something.
Have a great day.
Cheers,
Micky
--
Wishlist: http://tinyurl.com/22tgef
Switch:
At 5:11 PM +0200 9/5/07, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
tedd wrote:
Here's an example of what I mean by zoom cooperative:
http://www.php1.net/b/speech/
Now only does this site zoom well (according to me), but it's part of
my new deliver content via speech thing.
That's what I call em sized and some
I'm having a bit of a problem here. For some reason the red square
bullet before About won't show up in IE, however the bullet for
Personal Bio shows up fine. Any suggestions?
Below is the markup and the css:
http://www.liquidscience.net/andrew/testercopy.html
E Michael Brandt wrote:
...
I wonder if someone has a good CSS solution for this table: Two columns,
the first is of images, one per row, but of varying heights, the
second is of descriptive text of varying - but multiline - amounts which
I wish to center vertically to the right of
On 5/9/07 (00:19) Frank said:
This seems like a perfectly appropriate use of a table to me. You could
achieve a similar effect with an unordered list and floating images, but
I don't think it would be very more machine reader friendly, and it
would be much harder to get the alignment between
E Michael Brandt wrote:
http://www.badboy.ro/articles/2005-02-20/vertical_align_with_css/
Is there a good solution that works cross browser *without resorting
to semantically meaningless nested divs* ?
Divs are semantically neutral, which doesn't necessarily equate to
meaningless when used to
Ele wrote:
I've tried this solution and it seems to work:
div.pinkbar1 {
padding: 0; /* and height, color, background... you choose */
}
div.pinkbar1 ul {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
/* whatever else */
}
div.pinkbar1 li {
margin: 0;
line-height: 29px; /* the same height you chose for
tedd wrote:
However, if one removes your graphic from your layout, then it's
easily read. I think that allowing the user to see/read a graphic via
scrolling is preferable than presenting something that they can't
read at any zoom level. Don't you think?
Yes, and I would give the user
Rick Lecoat wrote:
On 5/9/07 (17:38) Rafael said:
But I wonder, if you include a doctype (and your code is valid) how
do you preserve the Quirks mode?
It's my understanding that including a doctype minus the URL will
permit this.
I think you're referring to this...
On 6/9/07 (00:14) Gunlaug said:
It's my understanding that including a doctype minus the URL will
permit this.
I think you're referring to this...
http://gutfeldt.ch/matthias/articles/doctypeswitch/table.html
I stand corrected (or vastly expanded upon!).
Cheers
--
Rick Lecoat
Recently I've had a couple instances where I wanted big link buttons, that
had block elements with them. One instance I wanted an entire dl as a
link. It was important to have the entire area clickable as a link, as well
as have a :hover class, so everything had to be wrapped in an a. My only
At 1:08 AM +0200 9/6/07, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
tedd wrote:
However, if one removes your graphic from your
layout, then it's easily read. I think that
allowing the user to see/read a graphic via
scrolling is preferable than presenting
something that they can't read at any zoom
level. Don't
At 7:02 AM +0200 9/5/07, Georg Sørtun wrote:
I recommend body {font-size: 100%;}.
On Wed, 5 Sep 2007 09:47:10 -0400, tedd responded:
I've seen 100.1% stated -- is there any real advantage in doing that?
My 2005 class notes say that IE 5 on Windows 98 needed this.
Sadly, I did not note
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007 20:52:55 -0700, Daniel Talsky wrote:
[...]
The URL:
http://dev.fluorideworks.org/parent
The problem is in the header... the images don't line up... just don't obey
the
absolute positioning.
I don't know what is causing your problem, Daniel, but I see a couple
of things
tedd wrote:
At 1:08 AM +0200 9/6/07, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
However, since that particular page is one of my test pages where
solutions are _supposed_ to be tested to breaking-point and far
beyond, that image isn't there to be read. It is there to break
solution - and browsers.
OK, I
Hi Guys,
I have a project which we started designing for IE6, then proceeded to
demo on IE7 compatability, which broke most of the IE6
compatabilities.
Now, I have to make the design cross browser (IE6, IE7 and Firefox).
I'm sure I can do these with a lot of time (and right frame of mind)
but is
Here's a new, static page with all validation errors fixed:
http://dev.fluorideworks.org/validationtest.php
Unfortunately that doesn't solve the problem at all.
I'm pretty certain now that the problem is somewhere in the following css:
#sloganMontage {
clear: both;
z-index: 50;
background:
Can someone see why Firefox 2 displays what I would like and IE 6 pushes
Knowledge is power and everything else under my tree logo?
HTML: http://www.infoforce-services.com
CSS: http://www.infoforce-services.com/css/layout.css
--
Love Hayden (Super Duper Guide Dog)and
The harness attachment
46 matches
Mail list logo