Background: #cco url('image.png') 0 0 no-repeat;
—
Sent from Mailbox for iPhone
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 8:22 PM, COM j...@coffeeonmars.com wrote:
Fiddling with trying to combine a background image with background color
applied to the same element and hoping to vary either one or both opacity.
You won't get PhotoShop multiply layer effects exactly, but using a 24bit png
for your image with areas of alpha transparency to allow the bg color to come
through is as close as u can get I believe.
HTH
—
Sent from Mailbox for iPhone
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 11:54 AM, COM
://necolas.github.io/normalize.css/
http://meyerweb.com/eric/tools/css/reset/
HTH
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css
font size from html' is a problem? What would the benefit
be? I see nothing to gain.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css
/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http
Is this getting through? Haven't gotten anything from the list since
July 10th...
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d
OK thanks everyone. Sorry for the noise. I had bothered Mr. Meyer
enough about this and was wondering if it was just me. Seems ok now!
;-)
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Mike Zeidler mczeid...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes :-)
On Aug 12, 2013 1:47 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote
If I'm following you, I'd float:left both the input and label. Adjust as needed.
HTH
—
Sent from Mailbox for iPhone
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 7:16 PM, Karl DeSaulniers k...@designdrumm.com
wrote:
So this check box is in a responsive layout and when the page is shrunk width
wise, the text
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
FWIW, what I do is repeat my styles without MQ's inside a conditional comment.
Lo-fi, I know, but if you don't want to load a polyfil, this is another option.
I use sass imports to do this in a neat way. Email me if you want any more
info.
—
Sent from Mailbox for iPhone
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Norman Fournier
nor...@normanfournier.com wrote:
If you're in a sharing mood, Tom, it would be great if you would post your
solutions to this mailing list, and we could all benefit from your hard work
;-)
On 2013-08-23, at 10:24 AM, Tom Livingston wrote
Developer Responsive
Design View. Command-Option-M on Mac.
Handy!
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http
List,
Anyone (still) use this? Is there something better?
http://selectivizr.com/
I use it regularly as nth-of type and first/last-of-type is so handy
and I have to support back to IE7 usually.
TIA
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx
Thank you Yucca
—
Sent from Mailbox for iPhone
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 2:37 AM, Jukka K. Korpela jkorp...@cs.tut.fi
wrote:
2013-08-26 22:18, Tom Livingston wrote:
Anyone (still) use this? Is there something better?
http://selectivizr.com/
I use it regularly as nth-of type and first
, say 600 or 768 and up for example? The MQ route was what
I have done in the past, but designers here would prefer the fonts on
mobile as well. Looking for some consensus on whether it's too much
for mobile.
Thoughts?
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph
-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media
Can't look right now but are you adding to or changing desktop styles or
replacing them. Are you working desktop down?
—
Sent from Mailbox for iPhone
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 6:20 PM, John A. Johnson j...@coffeeonmars.com
wrote:
I am trying to get solid on basic media queries with the
)
Thanks!
John
On Aug 29, 2013, at 3:28 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
Can't look right now but are you adding to or changing desktop styles or
replacing them. Are you working desktop down?
—
Sent from Mailbox for iPhone
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 6:20 PM, John A. Johnson j
Might be simpler to not have an MQ around your desktop since in this case it's
your base. And just make adjustments in the other MQs. No need to repeat
everything.
—
Sent from Mailbox for iPhone
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 7:01 PM, John A. Johnson j...@coffeeonmars.com
wrote:
OK..I may have
If you use the right MQs, you can still do that. Same concept, different widths
and adjustments.
—
Sent from Mailbox for iPhone
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 7:10 PM, John A. Johnson j...@coffeeonmars.com
wrote:
On Aug 29, 2013, at 4:06 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
Might
a thought, since you are just starting. Might be a good time to try it.
OK, I'll sleep better now.
Good luck.
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 7:15 PM, John A. Johnson j...@coffeeonmars.com wrote:
On Aug 29, 2013, at 4:11 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
If you use the right MQs, you can still
that this block stays at the bottom of the page.
I have a bad feeling. This will not work in Quirks mode.
Regards,
MarieAnge
My apologies. I only did a quick test on a page without enough content to
scroll. Sorry for the goose-chase.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Livingston
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 7:39 AM, Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com wrote:
Oops — forgot to reply all. Here we go:
Hi Marie-Ange,
If you can change the CSS but can't change the markup, and real position:
fixed is impossible, you can still achieve the same effect with the
following
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, 30 August 2013, Tom Livingston wrote:
jsfiddle doesn't seem to work in 8 it seems though :-P
Yes, sorry — codepen.io wasn't saving for me plus I like to keep all my
snippets in one place for future
List,
I have a request to fix some layout issues in IE10 Compatibility Mode.
Everything I've googled says IE10 CM should render like IE7. When I
view my page in IE10 CM, it breaks. When I view it in IE7, it's fine.
Can anyone point me in the right direction for trouble shooting this?
--
Tom
...@chrisrockwell.com
wrote:
I see .ie7 .wrapper {width: 940px}
Thing is, as I mentioned, it renders correctly in IE7. I need to
distinguish IE10CM from IE7 apparently...
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Philip Taylor p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk wrote:
Tom Livingston wrote:
Can anyone point me in the right direction for trouble shooting this?
As always, and with apologies for Raising My Voice : Post a URL !
Philip Taylor
Apologies. I was going for philosophical
Tom Livingston wrote:
Apologies. I was going for philosophical help as opposed to digging
into the code, but here it is:
http://everywhere.llbean.com/
OK, I have viewed it in IE9 and IE10 and have not spotted any obvious
problems in the latter; what problems should I expect to encounter
FYI, I know about the validation errors, however they occur in content
injected into my page that I have no control over.
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Philip Taylor p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk wrote:
Tom Livingston wrote:
Can
or IE10CM
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Chris Rockwell ch...@chrisrockwell.com
wrote:
And it looks like box-sizing: border-box is the ultimate culprit,
maybe
IE7 doesn't handle it well?? Was the box-sizing property
by the IE7
specific stylesheet.
Correct me if I'm wrong: isn't compatibility mode in IE10 supposed to be the
same as IE7?
Also, are you using a polyfill for box-sizing?
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
Terrific! This just keeps getting better! LOL.
I have
Thanks for all the help everyone. I'll file that one under 'weird'.
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
The wrapper width was the issue. Thanks for that.
For some reason, in my 7, that wasnt causing an issue, but in 10CM it
was. Removing it, however, didnt
Design/Dev industry no long
check for UA versions. Most don't even support the ancient UAs at all.
Just wondering.
On September 4, 2013 at 3:19 PM Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
Terrific! This just keeps getting better! LOL.
I have multiple VMs running XP, Vista and 8. One XP is 7
This might help:
http://www.campaignmonitor.com/guides/mobile
I believe they talk about client support, even if you aren't doing responsive.
I have another page bookmarked and will pass it on when I get in the office.
T
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 5, 2013, at 10:09 PM,
://www.email-standards.org/
http://www.campaignmonitor.com/css/
Hope this helps!
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css
to trying it
without though.
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 8:27 AM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 10:09 PM, vi...@graymatterstudios.ca wrote:
Hi. I have been lurking in this forum for a few years and have learned
quite a bit from reading the posts. Now I have a question
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Philip Taylor p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk wrote:
Tom Livingston wrote:
I should have mentioned that the inline font styling we do is
generally set on the td tag. With the possible need to repeat on
elements inside the td such as lis, but it's been a bit since I
with font tags
too. And for me, the ups out-weight the downs.
Tom
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Philip Taylor p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk wrote:
Tom Livingston wrote:
If I misread your post's intent, then I apologize for my tone.
Your tone was absolutely fine, Tom, and no offense was clearly
to support things
that barely have vendor prefixed support. I'm much more OK with that
than the former.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css
, Campaign Monitor and Marketo force
a text version to be made. If you don't do it, the system will do it
for you (so make sure you check it!).
Would this cover what you speak of Felix?
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
Speak of the devil:
https://twitter.com/meyerweb/status/376053792749268993
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Felix Miata mrma...@earthlink.net wrote:
On 2013-09-06 14:11 (GMT-0400) Tom Livingston composed:
Services I've used, like MailChimp, Campaign Monitor and Marketo force
a text version
:
Tom's suggestion may work as well, but you will need to fix your container.
Due to all of the child elements being floated, you will need height:
100%;overflow:auto so that your container wraps the children
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
They are also
/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ
not correct, it just looks
funny, to me, to see an a around a bunch of content :)
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Chris Rockwell ch...@chrisrockwell.com
wrote:
a is an inline element and cannot contain block level
in IE8+ and other normal browsers.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman
not correct, it just
looks
funny, to me, to see an a around a bunch of content :)
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Chris Rockwell
ch...@chrisrockwell.com
wrote:
a is an inline element and cannot contain block level
Fair point.
This one works with JS disabled:
http://www.discovermvp.com/employers/
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 12:19 PM, David Hucklesby huckle...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9/14/13 5:30 AM, Tom Livingston wrote:
I personally wouldn't want the main function of my navigation, on a
responsive site
it?
Best,
Karl DeSaulniers
Design Drumm
http://designdrumm.com
On Sep 14, 2013, at 10:36 AM, Philip Taylor wrote:
Tom Livingston wrote:
I personally wouldn't want the main function of my navigation, on a
responsive site intended for many devices of varying ability, to be
dependent
. The responsiveness.
Unless I am just totally out of the loop (this is not an impossible
assumption =) and there is a non-javascript responsive design... ?
If so, I am all ears/eyes.
Best,
Karl DeSaulniers
Design Drumm
http://designdrumm.com
On Sep 14, 2013, at 2:07 PM, Tom Livingston
, at 2:07 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
The responsiveness does work with IE9 and above as well as the usual
good browsers. Carousels and the like won't, obviously.
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Karl DeSaulniers k...@designdrumm.com
wrote:
@Tom: Does your responsive site work
{
...declarations
@media min-width {}
}
Recently I've been leaning more towards this way because it gives me the
ability to see the whole picture without moving from file to file. However,
I'm constantly questioning whether its the best way or not.
On Sep 14, 2013 3:46 PM, Tom Livingston tom
To clarify, I'm delivering desktop only to old IE.
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
I prefer to deliver desktop only to older browsers, so your inline
MQs would make this more difficult as you would need to make/write a
separate sheet to pull this off
://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman
What browser/version?
On Saturday, September 14, 2013, David Hucklesby wrote:
On 9/14/13 9:30 AM, Tom Livingston wrote:
Fair point.
This one works with JS disabled:
http://www.discovermvp.com/**employers/http://www.discovermvp.com/employers/
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 12:19 PM, David
Can you tell me the browser, version and OS you were using? I'd like
to look into it.
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 9:10 PM, David Hucklesby huckle...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9/14/13 9:30 AM, Tom Livingston wrote:
Fair point.
This one works with JS disabled:
http://www.discovermvp.com/employers
On Tuesday, September 17, 2013, Chris Rockwell wrote:
Seems to work for me. At full width I get a navigation with hover, at
narrow it's just stacked navigation items (no hover action).
Seems like a nice responsive site Tom, good work.
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Tom Livingston
tom
Supported by evolt.org --
http://www.evolt.org/help_**support_evolt/http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
In my experience, yes it is 320 or 480 etc. You can test this yourself.
Make a div 320 wide, and see what fits.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph
On Tuesday, September 17, 2013, David Hucklesby wrote:
On 9/17/13 9:02 AM, Tom Livingston wrote:
On Tuesday, September 17, 2013, Chris Rockwell wrote:
Seems to work for me. At full width I get a navigation with hover, at
narrow it's just stacked navigation items (no hover action).
Seems
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston
/
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not seeing the css in the head as having any effect on the video
or it's wrapper for some reason. FireBug in FF 23.0.1.
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Chris Rockwell ch...@chrisrockwell.com
wrote:
I use the last
.
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Chris Rockwell ch...@chrisrockwell.com
wrote:
a is an inline element and cannot contain block level elements (such as
div).
One way is:
.container {
position: relative
-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx
I believe they meant only external users on the stats.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 22, 2013, at 11:13 PM, Robert A. Rosenberg webdesig...@rarpsl.com
wrote:
At 10:51 -0400 on 09/22/2013, Tom Livingston wrote about Re: [css-d] Where do
you cut-off your browser support?:
But
we recently
/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List
with content.
__
It's always going to depend on the context surrounding the centered
div. This is a viable solution under the right circumstances.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 1:56 PM, MiB digital.disc...@gmail.com wrote:
1 oct 2013 19.42 Tom Livingston:
This is a viable solution under the right circumstances.
And just what did I just say?
The solutions I linked to are worse, are they?
I don't believe I even eluded to any such thing. I
wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
Sorry...
correction:
.c2.c1{width: 20px}
?
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
What about:
c2.c1{width: 20px}
?
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Chris Rockwell ch...@chrisrockwell.com
wrote:
That is why it works that way, yes.
The engine sees two
Is the comma valid there? I've never seen that before.
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 1, 2013, at 7:07 PM, Karl Snyder k...@mountain-mall.com wrote:
Seems to make a difference in Chrome if you add a comma between the classes
(see div id line below), otherwise both lines are yellow:
!DOCTYPE
You could see if the problem appears using the browser modes in the ie10 F-12
tools. Just a thought. Not near my VMs right now.
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 8, 2013, at 6:40 PM, Theresa Jennings theresajennings2...@gmail.com
wrote:
http://girlscoutssangorgonio.org
The client just
, my past discussions with you in particular have resulted in my
realization that those browser modes are not to be trusted.
On Oct 8, 2013 7:49 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
You could see if the problem appears using the browser modes in the ie10
F-12 tools. Just a thought
.
On Oct 8, 2013, at 5:42 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
If it showed the issue, it might help see the problem as the OP doesn't
currently have access to 9. An iffy solution at best but better than sitting
idle waiting for the list to reply.
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 8, 2013, at 8:06 PM
://netrenderer.com/ that helped.
S, how do I hack this to make it work in IE8 (and maybe 7)?
I'm on a Mac, running FF, Chrome, Safari.
On Oct 8, 2013, at 5:42 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
If it showed the issue, it might help see the problem as the OP doesn't
currently have access to 9. An iffy
So, you'd use:
.ie7 #iconsRectangle img{margin-right: .32em;}
change the amount as needed.
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Theresa Jennings
theresajennings2...@gmail.com wrote:
I would have no idea how to construct such a thing.
On Oct 8, 2013, at 6:36 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
So, how
in the snippet I sent earlier.
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Theresa Jennings
theresajennings2...@gmail.com wrote:
I would have no idea how to construct such a thing.
On Oct 8, 2013, at 6:36 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
So, how to fix... like you asked... ;-)
You have conditionals on your HTML element
.
Thank you!
On Oct 8, 2013, at 6:47 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
To be clear, the page has conditional comments wrapping the HTML
element to apply classes based on version of IE. There's one for 7, 8
and 9. The classes being .ie7, .ie8 and .ie9 respectively.
You'd add those classes in front
don't have IE7 where I'm at but the 30% !important
with a margin is sure to break somewhere. It is jogging at narrow viewport
as well on Chrome and FF. With IE7, I'm guessing it has something to do
with the box-model.
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
So
by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css
Sorry. I was referring to adding the ie7 specific right margin
adjustment to the head.
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 10:29 PM, Theresa Jennings
theresajennings2...@gmail.com wrote:
Except, as I mentioned, the images are 308px, not 300.
On Oct 8, 2013, at 7:25 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
Could add
: 100%;
margin-top: -20px;
}
#ie8 .home .content-home-right {
float: left;
width: 73%;
}
}
This is working for me as well in my IE8 WinXP VM
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279
Any advice?
-Fred Hahnel
We used the below as a starting point. Show/hide seems risky to me as
you will most likely find a client that won't hide what you need
hidden.
http://www.campaignmonitor.com/blog/post/3442/mobile-email-design-in-practice/
HTH
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front
On Oct 17, 2013, at 3:20 PM, Jay Tanna jta...@rocketmail.com wrote:
Will something like this work?
@media only screen and (min-width: 769px) {
img {
display:none;
}
}
For an email client that ignores MQs, the img here would still be visible in
the email.
tableclass=blogcellspacing=0cellpadding=0
extends beyond the right boundary of its parent element:
divid=ja-content
What browser? I'm not seeing the issue in FF 24
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
*
Looks like the article columns near the bottom are 50% each, plus 25px
left and right padding. Turning off the padding helps, but I think
there is more going on like that in the two columns.
HTH
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Peredur pere...@peredur.net wrote:
El 21/10/13 17:12, Tom Livingston escribió:
Looks like the article columns near the bottom are 50% each, plus 25px
left and right padding. Turning off the padding helps, but I think there is
more going on like
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 27, 2013, at 9:00 PM, The Doctor doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
What would you recommend for a good HTML5 CSS3 reference?
Take a look at abookapart.com. Some good ones there as well.
--
Member - Liberal InternationalThis is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici
, but I'm not that savvy with JS
so don't know what Google solutions I've come across are good to use.
Any thoughts? Can it be done with CSS in a way I'm not thinking of?
TIA
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann derhoe...@gmx.net wrote:
* Tom Livingston wrote:
Having an RWD problem.
(I imagine that stands for Responsive Web Design. You are the first to
this abbreviation on this list.)
Shocking, but Yay me!
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End
, 31 October 2013, Tom Livingston wrote:
List,
Having an RWD problem.
I have a container and an image. Nothing else is in the container. I
need to swap said image with another for smaller devices.
I could do this with background images except how do I handle the
height of the container
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Barney. I'm familiar with the technique, but never thought to
use it with an img. I'll give it a look.
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Barney Carroll
barney.carr...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't have the link to hand
think
in this case they are negligible. There are only 2 cases where this
occurs and I optimize my images.
Thanks Philippe and all.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
? inspecting the page with FireBug
shows this for an image path:
content/_2414553454_large.html
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css
when
I do a local preview so why, if the paths are bad, would they show up
locally but not on the web?
Is it trying to find the images on a local file system?
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
missing?
I would suspect the custom font isn't loading for that page, and you
are getting fallback. Using FireFox's own inspector, and choosing the
Fonts tab on the right, it isn't showing the Cabin font loading on
the checkout page.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic
loading?
Thanks,
Yazmin
Not 100% sure. I see the google font linked in the head. Only thing
I'm noticing is that the checkout page is all https and fonts aren't?
Maybe that?
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
loading?
Thanks,
Yazmin
Changing the fonts to https on the fly in the inspector, in FF, got it
to work for me...
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
sentence. Or I'm not following your thought here...
-Fred Hahnel
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
also show the unwanted blank
spacing
-Fred Hahnel
Can you post a link to an email or copy/paste a sample that presents
the problem?
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
widths or # of
columns, etc.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman
401 - 500 of 1154 matches
Mail list logo
