Subscription issue. Sorry about the noise.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css
wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
On Apr 25, 2014, at 1:43 AM, Philip Taylor p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk wrote:
Eric wrote:
I'll raise my hand and say I'm against it. Not because I have a problem with
CSS
pre-processors rather because this is a CSS list. Pre-processors are simply a
tool used to write CSS in a more
/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Philip Taylor p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk wrote:
Tom Livingston wrote:
Actually, I believe it has. I get those as do some others, and I only
get them as replies to CSS-D threads. Mr. Meyer is aware of this
issue.
But what can he do about it, since
10:16 AM, MiB digital.disc...@gmail.com wrote:
This got held up for unknown reasons:
apr 10 2014 18:50 Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com:
it's still useable. He's not leaving mobile users *completely* out in the
cold.
That it is so, is still quite a bit beside the point I think. The users only
. That may
be intentional...
HTH
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman
resolution at 326 pixels per inch (ppi)
and the other of 1024-by-768 resolution at 163 pixels per inch (ppi).
I dont think @media only screen and (min-device-width : 768px) and
(max-device-width : 1024px) will work in both cases... unless I'm
thinking about resolution wrong.
TIA
--
Tom Livingston
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Philippe Wittenbergh e...@l-c-n.com wrote:
Le 6 mai 2014 à 22:12, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com a écrit :
Retina has specs of 2048-by-1536 resolution at 326 pixels per inch (ppi)
and the other of 1024-by-768 resolution at 163 pixels per inch (ppi).
Those
- which is what I want/expect. My MQ for
desktop triggers at 960px wide.
Can anyone explain what is happening?
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
tweak and not
a critical usability fix, I'd say it's pretty harmless.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Sent from my iPhone
On May 26, 2014, at 11:59 AM, Shari Lynn Smith webweave...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a site I've designed mobile 1st and everything seemed to be
working fine, however on my Android tablet in Chrome when the 7 screen is
in portrait the aside is showing to the right very
and mp4 using
html5 element.
http://www.videojs.com
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Rod Castello rodcastel...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Need some quick, real world advice on adding an mp4 video to a web page.
It needs to work in modern versions of major browsers. I can skip
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 6, 2014, at 4:08 PM, David Laakso laakso.davi...@gmail.com wrote:
Constructive comments and suggestions on this site are always appreciated.
html
http://ccstudi.com
css
http://ccstudi.com/site/css/sisu.css
Best,
David Laakso
Only comment I have is
and/or position:fixed mess up the
stacking order? I have tried z-index ordering them but it isn't
helping. I'm sorry but I cant post a link as of yet.
TIA
#663399Becca
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello list,
I'm having an issue where the design I'm working on requires a
position:fixed nav bar over a series of divs that contain a fixed
background image (background-attachment:fixed;). As you scroll, these
divs
drawing a blank.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 15, 2014, at 10:29 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh e...@l-c-n.com wrote:
Le 16 juin 2014 à 10:05, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com a écrit :
List,
Can't post a link right now so bear with me...
Given:
div class=leftcol clear
div class=cta-wrap/div
Does .dots contain something that contribute to the height of .leftcol?
This is a possible solution:
.leftcol { position: relative; }
.dots { position: absolute; top: 0; bottom: 0; }
This looks like it's gonna work well. Thanks Philippe.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer
On Acid for checking your
email layouts. They also provide tips on correcting issues as well as
optimizations, etc.
litmus.com
emailonacid.com
If you know all this, well...maybe someone else can benefit...
HTH
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231
a
great idea.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki
except for in Google Webmaster Tools and that doesn't give
much help in troubleshooting it.
Do any of you see this issue, and if so, can you help track it down?
Thanks in advance...
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279
On Friday, June 20, 2014, Norman Fournier nor...@normanfournier.com wrote:
Camino on my mac shows the blue only w/o any text or graphics once. The
source shows all the html in place but none renders. On a second visit,
everything looked fine.
On 2014-06-20, at 12:42 PM, Tom Livingston wrote
on a laptop
-Original Message-
From: css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org
[mailto:css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org] On Behalf Of Tom Livingston
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2014 2:43 PM
To: CSS Discussion Group
Subject: [css-d] Rendering issues
List,
We've had a report of a rendering issue
, but I tried my browser with and
without JS and I still saw the content...
Odd one.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css
On 6/23/14 12:10 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
Understood. But turning off js did not allow me to replicate the issue.
Regardless, you would think if a negative z index put the content behind a
solid blue div with js enabled - as is the case with the rule in the CSS -
why did anyone see any content
On Monday, June 23, 2014, Philippe Wittenbergh e...@l-c-n.com wrote:
Le 24 juin 2014 à 04:05, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com javascript:;
a écrit :
We found an errant z-index which was putting the content
behind the blue background wrapper. :-P
Le 24 juin 2014 à 04:08, Norman Fournier
On Monday, June 23, 2014, Jon Reece jon.re...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 8:32 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh e...@l-c-n.com
javascript:;
wrote:
Le 24 juin 2014 à 04:05, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com javascript:;
a écrit :
We found an errant z-index which was putting
sometimes corrects the layout, but would be great to
fix this. Thanks all again!
Looks like the script is the issue. I disabled JS and the footer is
consistently placed properly. Is it in a document.ready? Placed at the
bottom rather than the head? Just thinking out loud here...
--
Tom
and css and have better luck
with the fixed header.
Some googling resulted in nothing other than solutions similar to yours.
That's a good one. I look forward to someone smarter than me figuring it out...
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx
into the spec, I didn't see anything obvious stating
NOTHING else can be within the label element. So I wonder if span
might be allowed? I'd have to whip up a test and run it through the
validator and see if it complains.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Crest Christopher
crestchristop...@gmail.com wrote:
I've had to restyle my form and it has caused the validator to inform me I'm
not allowed to use p as a child element of a label tag
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 7:05 PM, Robert A. Rosenberg
webdesig...@rarpsl.com wrote:
At 14:08 -0400 on 07/09/2014, Tom Livingston wrote about Re: [css-d] P tag
can't be child of label ?:
If you wrap the input with the label, you can leave off the
'for' attribute (just read that... had no idea
You're fine
On Monday, July 14, 2014, Crest Christopher crestchristop...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm confused, I was using the for attribute;
label for=email id=mailspan class=mailemail/span/label
???
Tom Livingston wrote:
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 7:05 PM, Robert A. Rosenbergwebdesig
display:table; and
vertical-align:bottom; on the parent ?
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css
, it would be 19px (rounded down) or
1.188em;
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 11:22 AM, John j...@coffeeonmars.com wrote:
On Jul 24, 2014, at 8:18 AM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
ems are relative to font size.
Given a browser default of 16px, 1em = 16px.
If you have something set at font-size: 120%;, that's 120% bigger than
16px
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 11:38 AM, John j...@coffeeonmars.com wrote:
On Jul 24, 2014, at 8:35 AM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
Where, specifically on the page, are we talking about?
This spot:
http://www.coffeeonmars.com/170_su/template/home.html
this declaration:
#header-logo
header and h1, or an article element with a
header and h1, etc.
But this is getting into the semantics of HTML which is off-topic for
this list. STYLING those elements would be back on topic. ;-)
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:00 PM, John j...@coffeeonmars.com wrote:
On Jul 24, 2014, at 8:53 AM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
Not really. You are currently making that the highest level head
element (h1) of the page. Is that what you want?
Not if the h1-wrapped element is a graphic
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:52 PM, John j...@coffeeonmars.com wrote:
On Jul 24, 2014, at 9:49 AM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
You could, since that h1 is an image, spec it to be font-size: 1em; but I
tend to agree text trumps alt text.
OK..so for the css declaration, it could
, correct ?
Tom Livingston wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Crest
Christophercrestchristop...@gmail.com
javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','crestchristop...@gmail.com'); wrote:
Now you confused me ?
ems are relative to font size.
Given a browser default of 16px, 1em = 16px.
If you have
I believe so.
On Thursday, July 24, 2014, Crest Christopher crestchristop...@gmail.com
wrote:
A font-size of 120% is 19px, is my math correct ?
Tom Livingston wrote:
I don't know about golden, but it equal to the browser default which, if
unchanged, is usually 16px.
On Thursday, July
Lack of rem support is easily taken care of with a fallback declaration
using px:
Font-size:16px;
Font-size:1rem;
This allows MOST browsers to use a relative font unit - honoring a users
preference for font size - without the compounding issues (and any
other) of the em.
--
Tom Livingston
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Chris F.A. Johnson
ch...@cfajohnson.com wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jul 2014, Tom Livingston wrote:
Lack of rem support is easily taken care of with a fallback declaration
using px:
Font-size:16px;
Font-size:1rem;
Better still, using em or %:
font-size: 100
the 332px with 940px.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo
You also have 2 containers with the same ID of #main_header. The
header and a child div. That's a no no.
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 4:19 PM, John j...@coffeeonmars.com wrote:
I am trying a better way to style and position
the fonts on a page. By no means am I saying this is the only way, just the
way I do it. Works like a charm so far. :)
Best,
Karl
Screen readers care about font size ?
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
as the body font-size and % else where and it still
worked like I wanted and let me set the optimal font in Firefox. So I will
be switching to ems as the body font-size. Thanks all.
I set body to 100%. Size elements - minimally - with rems.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media
an MQ related to viewport
height like:
@media screen and (max-height: 1024px){
header{height: $shorter-height;}
}
My question is what is the proper place to put this? After all my
other MQs? In with my styles near where the taller height is
specified? Does it matter?
--
Tom Livingston | Senior
) {
@import 960;
}
I've done both where I've added at the end of this, and put tweaky MQs
in individual sheets. Just wondering if one place is better than the
other.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Chris Rockwell ch...@chrisrockwell.com
wrote:
Hi Tom,
Without knowing how you have your styles structured, I can really only guess
at how I would do it.
I use partials like crazy so
?
Thanks
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki
-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 9:44 PM, Crest Christopher
crestchristop...@gmail.com wrote:
I changed a section to a div and the validator continues to point to the
line as an error.
Link?
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279
pane of
developer tools, you'll be able to see what styles are being applied to the
element.
Firefox has a Fonts tab on the right. Very handy.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231
-- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 1:15 PM, Debbie Campbell d...@redkitecreative.com
wrote:
It only appears on hover for me in the latest Chrome/FF..
Sorry I misunderstood what you were after...
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279
wrapper) and adjust the styles of the menu to stay visible.
Changing the class per page.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d
On Monday, August 4, 2014, Tim Dawson t...@ramasaig.com wrote:
On 31/07/2014 14:17, Tom Livingston wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Chris Rockwell ch...@chrisrockwell.com
Tip: if you're using Chrome or Firefox, highlight some of the text
(really
not necessary, i just
On Monday, August 4, 2014, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, August 4, 2014, Tim Dawson t...@ramasaig.com
javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','t...@ramasaig.com'); wrote:
On 31/07/2014 14:17, Tom Livingston wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Chris Rockwell ch
-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
browsers).
My thought was that it would work like background-color does.
Sample page:
http://tomliv.com/nick-test/
Just trying to learn here. Why does the cascade not work in both cases?
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279
-image: image.svg;
But this fails in IE8 (and presumably in other non-svg-supporting
browsers).
My thought was that it would work like background-color does.
Sample page:
http://tomliv.com/nick-test/
Just trying to learn here. Why does the cascade not work in both cases?
--
Tom Livingston
the resource you're giving it.
Chris Rockwell
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com
javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','tom...@gmail.com'); wrote:
I've seen that and others. I'm looking for why. Why don't they work the
same.
On Tuesday, August 5, 2014, Chris Rockwell
-with-png/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ
On Tuesday, August 5, 2014, Chris Rockwell ch...@chrisrockwell.com wrote:
Hey Tom, just a heads up that you need to include the 2nd argument in
background-image:, otherwise it won't fallback.
Ah yes. Correct.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph
Drumm
http://designdrumm.com
On Aug 5, 2014, at 7:45 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com
javascript:; wrote:
Background: url(image.png);
background-image: url(image.svg), none;
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css
, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com
javascript:; wrote:
These were simple examples. In practice, I'd add MQ to stop that from
happening in most browsers.
On Tuesday, August 5, 2014, Karl DeSaulniers k...@designdrumm.com
javascript:; wrote:
So with this, my browser, if it supports svg has
purist, this is gold. ;)
Best,
Karl DeSaulniers
Design Drumm
http://designdrumm.com
On Aug 5, 2014, at 8:11 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com
javascript:; wrote:
Most likely, yes.
On Tuesday, August 5, 2014, Karl DeSaulniers k...@designdrumm.com
javascript:; wrote:
I see. But so
Of course, YMMV, but like I said, if you're already using modernizr - which
also includes the html5shiv - it's trivial to handle this svg situation.
On Tuesday, August 5, 2014, Karl DeSaulniers k...@designdrumm.com wrote:
On Aug 5, 2014, at 8:19 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com
javascript
is support universally except for very ancient UAs (IE8 is
south of 5% now) why bother with a fallback image? Why not just give them a
background-color?
Seems like a whole lot of wasted work for a drop int he bucket of users.
Eric
On August 5, 2014 at 9:00 AM Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote
-to-flexbox/
Philippe
--
Was looking for that tutorial. Philippe beat me to it.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css
-- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph
://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman
, but I see a page differently and can recreate it in
html with out the need of a million classes for columns.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph
-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
[css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End
by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http
://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231
Not sure about too many, but are you clearing them properly? I prefer
clearfix, but others like overflow:hidden; method.
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 4:43 PM, John j...@coffeeonmars.com wrote:
On Aug 19, 2014, at 1:26 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
Clear: both; on #middle brought
When I was messing with it in firebug, I added overflow:hidden; on the
nav ul, and clear both on #middle
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 4:47 PM, John j...@coffeeonmars.com wrote:
On Aug 19, 2014, at 1:44 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
Not sure about too many, but are you clearing them
/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
not seeing the forest for the
trees...
TIA
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org
The text isn't a graphic.
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Crest Christopher
crestchristop...@gmail.com wrote:
What do you mean by live text ?
Christopher
Tom Livingston wrote:
color: $lightblue
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231
Sorry. A little sass is still in there.
On Tuesday, September 2, 2014, Philip Taylor p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk wrote:
Tom Livingston wrote:
background-color: $yellow;
color: $lightblue;
What do the dollar signs contribute ?
Philip Taylor
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End
class=buttonLive Text!/button
Best,
Karl
Karl DeSaulniers
Design Drumm
http://designdrumm.com
On Sep 2, 2014, at 3:45 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com
javascript:; wrote:
The text isn't a graphic.
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Crest Christopher
crestchristop...@gmail.com
I'll play with that, thanks Georg
On Tuesday, September 2, 2014, Georg ge...@gunlaug.com wrote:
Den 02.09.2014 22:20, skrev Tom Livingston:
http://www.tomliv.com/img/button.png
If that's a typical button, I would think the addition of
'background-size' and adding the arrow
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 7:55 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh e...@l-c-n.com wrote:
Le 3 sept. 2014 à 07:05, Georg ge...@gunlaug.com a écrit :
Den 02.09.2014 22:20, skrev Tom Livingston:
http://www.tomliv.com/img/button.png
If that's a typical button, I would think the addition of
'background
this:
a href= class=buttonLearn More/a
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
If you look carefully at the image I linked to, the text and arrow image
aren't well centered vertically. It look better in Safari. I know vertical
centering is a bit annoying but is there a better way to go about
.
.button{
background-position: 100% 0;
}
.button:hover{
background-position: 100% -43px;
}
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d
the coffee
cup layout on that page is how do you provide a fallback for that?
Anyone?
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
__
css-discuss [css-d
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 8:32 AM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote:
Good morning fellow listers,
CSS Shapes.
No doubt this will be something I'm asked to do in a page layout soon. I
was just watching this demo of a new Chrome extension:
http://razvancaliman.com/writing/css-shapes
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Philippe Wittenbergh e...@l-c-n.com wrote:
Le 4 sept. 2014 à 21:32, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com a écrit :
No doubt this will be something I'm asked to do in a page layout soon. I
was just watching this demo of a new Chrome extension:
http
601 - 700 of 1154 matches
Mail list logo
