Re: [css-d] After positioning relative, IE places everything far below

2006-05-26 Thread Chris W. Parker
Zoe M. Gillenwater mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thursday, May 25, 2006 7:39 AM said: You're right, relative positioning is not useful in the way you are using it. I would use a negative margin to shift something up like that. But relative positioning, without applying any offsets, is

[css-d] After positioning relative, IE places everything far below

2006-05-24 Thread Chris W. Parker
Hello, I'm just now experimenting with 'position: relative;' and I've come to find out that even when I place an element outside a div (with relatively positioned elements inside it) it is still pushed below the point where the positioned elements WOULD have been (had they not been positioned).

Re: [css-d] After positioning relative, IE places everything far below

2006-05-24 Thread Chris W. Parker
Ingo Chao mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wednesday, May 24, 2006 1:15 PM said: This does not sound wrong. http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visuren.html#choose-position When a box B is relatively positioned, the position of the following box is calculated as though B were not offset. Hmm... then I

RE: [css-d] Vertically alignment of the custom list bullet (image)

2005-08-12 Thread Chris W. Parker
Don Hinshaw mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wednesday, August 10, 2005 2:54 PM said: Hi Chris, I think this is what you are looking for: http://css.maxdesign.com.au/listutorial/introduction.htm Sorry Don. I forgot to reply to this. Your link worked like a champ! Thanks, Chris.

[css-d] Vertically alignment of the custom list bullet (image)

2005-08-10 Thread Chris W. Parker
Hello, Is it possible to adjust the vertical positioning of graphical list bullets? I've got an arrow bullet that is resting about 2 pixels higher than I'd like it to. I haven't found anything that suggets it can be moved (css-d archives, google, my own experimentation). Is this possible, and if

[css-d] non-floated element aligning to bottom of floated element (IE)

2005-07-15 Thread Chris W. Parker
Hello, I'm not sure what this is called and I was unsuccessful in finding anything about it in google. I have a column that is 'float: left; width: 220px;' and a table that is 'margin-left: 220px;'. In Fx the table looks as expected, directly adjacent to the floated column. But in IE the table

[css-d] Still having a problem with scope

2005-05-26 Thread Chris W. Parker
Hello, This time it's on a different item (never got the other one solved, will come back to it later). p class=printer_friendly a href=page.php target=_blank img src=pic.gif alt=Printer / Printer friendly /a /p The following css only affects the background! p.printer_friendly a {

[css-d] FW: Still having a problem with scope

2005-05-26 Thread Chris W. Parker
Chris W. Parker on Thursday, May 26, 2005 10:23 AM said: p.printer_friendly a { text-size: xx-small; background: red; } Why??? Because you're not paying attention Chris! It should be 'font-size' duh! And of course I realize this IMMEDIATELY after I hit send! Ugh

[css-d] CSS Scope: I think I'm being specific enough...?

2005-05-24 Thread Chris W. Parker
Hello, I've got the following HTML... form id=order_submit input type=submit value=Submit Order/ /form ...that is being influenced by some more general CSS rules (background and border and width). If I declare those things within the style attribute I can get it to look how I want. Yet when I