Re: [css-d] PROBLEM with CSS for checkbox - Firefox

2017-06-20 Thread Mi B
> 20 juni 2017 kl. 12:05 skrev Karl DeSaulniers : > > I chose to go with -*-appearance: unset; because I am able to turn it back on > say on an individual page. > With !important, I have to override and override and override and can't just > simply remove the !important.

Re: [css-d] list of all the CSS properties?

2017-04-15 Thread Mi B
> apr. 15 2017 Dean, John : > > If I use the wiki page at > https://www.w3.org/community/webed/wiki/CSS/Properties (which is organized > quite nicely) instead of the above URL, can I count on that URL persisting > for a long time (my first edition should run about 4

Re: [css-d] vw and vh units -- how does one learn of developments in the CSS spec. such as these ?

2017-03-31 Thread Mi B
target PX/1vw in PX __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html

Re: [css-d] vw and vh units -- how does one learn of developments in the CSS spec. such as these ?

2017-03-31 Thread Mi B
> 1 apr. 2017 kl. 01:09 skrev Crest Christopher : > > Your post is sorta jumbled. You're saying 1vw or (0.01*1200=96px) ? I pasted from OpenOffice. Sorry. (target PX/1vw in PX) >> target px expressed in vw. The actual size of 1vw is determined by 0.01*width. I

Re: [css-d] vw and vh units -- how does one learn of developments in the CSS spec. such as these ?

2017-03-31 Thread Mi B
> apr. 1 2017 kl. 00:32 Crest Christopher : > > How do you get 96px from 8vw if the viewport width is 1200px ? width 1200px 1 vw =0,01*width px target 96 px exp as (target/1vw )vw>> 8vw > >> Tom Livingston

Re: [css-d] vw and vh units -- how does one learn of developments in the CSS spec. such as these ?

2017-03-23 Thread Mi B
> 23 mars 2017 Crest Christopher : > > Speaking of which, can someone once again clarify, for example; 2.2em would > equal 4.4vw ? I haven’t used these new units, but according to https://www.w3.org/TR/css3-values/#lengths 'vw’ is "1% of viewport’s width and ’vh’

Re: [css-d] anyway to style tag?

2017-03-16 Thread Mi B
> 15 mars 2017 kl. 16:33 skrev Angela French : > > I would be happy just applying a background color as the latest version of > Chrome renders the player seemingly not in a container. What’s the code design reason for using only the audio element and not wrapping it?

Re: [css-d] anyway to style tag?

2017-03-15 Thread Mi B
I still use this http://www.mediaelementjs.com that covers audio and video and allows for styling. > 14 mars 2017 kl. 23:36 skrev Angela French : > > Hello, > I am experimenting with using the tag. I see it looks very different > across browsers. Is there any way to

Re: [css-d] Using CSS to style a back button

2017-02-23 Thread Mi B
> 23 feb. 2017 kl. 23:48 skrev Rod Castello : > > Hi, > I'm using this code to generate a button that takes my users to the page > the just came from. > I'm trying to find out how to add a class or id to it, but haven't been > able to find anything online as of yet. > >

Re: [css-d] order of rules in a single declaration

2016-10-14 Thread Mi B
> 14 okt. 2016 kl. 06:54 skrev Karl DeSaulniers : > > The parser does care somewhat. Depends on the browser > In my research I have found that they load aspects before dynamics. > > Loading the elements basic parameters first like color, background color then > fonts,

Re: [css-d] iPad differences

2016-08-11 Thread Mi B
> aug. 11 2016 08:37 skrev Mi B <digital.disc...@gmail.com>: > > >> aug. 11 2016 07:38 Karl DeSaulniers <k...@designdrumm.com >> <mailto:k...@designdrumm.com>>: >> >> Chrome is built off of Gecko and Webkit anyway. Probably why you

Re: [css-d] iPad differences

2016-08-11 Thread Mi B
> aug. 11 2016 07:38 Karl DeSaulniers : > > Chrome is built off of Gecko and Webkit anyway. Probably why you didn't see > much difference. > It "technically" IS Safari under the hood. No, it isn’t. "It’s here: Google replaces WebKit version ID with Blink in latest

Re: [css-d] OT? HTML 5 root wrapper element?

2016-05-27 Thread Mi B
> 25 maj 2016 kl. 00:03 skrev J.C. Berry : > > which HTML5 element should > be used for a wrapper element? I write meaningful markup and fall back to general ones like DIV as needed. So if my content is an unordered list then UL is the natural wrapper to use for its

Re: [css-d] New website

2016-03-11 Thread Mi B
> mars 11 2016 01:16 Karl DeSaulniers : > > http://designdrumm.com Much better, but the animation can be toned down even more. It should tempt the visitor, not turn them away. Because of other animations in other sites, tolerances for

Re: [css-d] New website

2016-03-02 Thread Mi B
> feb. 29 2016 23:32 Karl DeSaulniers : > > Got another website. This time it's my own portfolio website. It is an > infinite loop horizontal scrolling responsive website. How’s these flickering images responsive? Instant page closer and bye bye. You should count on

Re: [css-d] New website

2016-02-03 Thread Mi B
> 30 jan. 2016 kl. 18:42 skrev D'Arcy J.M. Cain : > > On Sat, 30 Jan 2016 18:33:56 +0100 > MiB wrote: >> 30 jan 2016 kl. 11:42 skrev D'Arcy J.M. Cain : >> >>> Have you considered checking your database access? WP sites