Re: [css-d] order of rules in a single declaration
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Karl DeSaulnierswrote: > Agreed. The parser doesn't care, but the browser will interpret and reorder > based on its settings/preferences. > > > Best, > > Karl DeSaulniers Bottom line, the page layout/display is not effected by the order of declarations. Thanks all. -- Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic | ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com #663399 __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] order of rules in a single declaration
Agreed. The parser doesn't care, but the browser will interpret and reorder based on its settings/preferences. Best, Karl DeSaulniers Design Drumm http://designdrumm.com > On Oct 14, 2016, at 7:00 AM, Mi Bwrote: > > The ordering is only an indication of interpretation. It’s not proof. > Certainly not for the parser caring about order in the CSS source. __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] order of rules in a single declaration
> 14 okt. 2016 kl. 06:54 skrev Karl DeSaulniers: > > The parser does care somewhat. Depends on the browser > In my research I have found that they load aspects before dynamics. > > Loading the elements basic parameters first like color, background color then > fonts, font size, line height then width, height and then margins, padding > and then borders, transitions, shadows and then position, clip and display. The ordering is only an indication of interpretation. It’s not proof. Certainly not for the parser caring about order in the CSS source. > > I got this from the inspect element pane and how different browsers > were ordering my css. If you have them out of order, safari would reorder > them > according to their spec and I had found that most other browsers treated this > the same way and reordered them similarly. > > So it is a yes and no answer with a personal preference included. > Try it for yourself. Put them in the order you want and see how Safari or > chrome or firefox > reorder them respectively. > > For example: > > div{ > width: 100%; > margin: 10px 20px; > padding: 0; > position: relative; > display: block; > } > > Best, > > Karl DeSaulniers > Design Drumm > http://designdrumm.com > > > > >> On Oct 13, 2016, at 10:32 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: >> >> >>> On Oct 14, 2016, at 12:13 PM, Tom Livingston wrote: >>> >>> Curious. Does the order of declarations within a single rule matter? >>> Not specificity between rules. >>> >>> For example: >>> >>> div{ >>> position: relative; >>> display: block; >>> width: 100%; >>> margin: 10px 20px; >>> padding: 0; >>> } >>> >>> as opposed to: >>> >>> div{ >>> display: block; >>> margin: 10px 20px; >>> padding: 0; >>> position: relative; >>> width: 100%; >>> } >>> >>> Make any difference? >> >> No. The CSS parser doesn’t care. >> >> For the human eye aka readability of a stylesheet, that is another matter. >> Excellent fuel for violent flame wars. >> >> Philippe >> -- >> Philippe Wittenbergh >> http://l-c-n.com/ >> >> >> >> >> >> __ >> css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] >> http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d >> List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ >> List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html >> Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ > > __ > css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] > http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d > List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ > List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html > Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] order of rules in a single declaration
For clarity, I'll include my reply to Philippe, which I accidentally sent only to him... On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 11:34 PM Tom Livingstonwrote: > >> Make any difference? > > > > No. The CSS parser doesn’t care. > > > > For the human eye aka readability of a stylesheet, that is another > matter. Excellent fuel for violent flame wars. > > > > Philippe > > -- > > Philippe Wittenbergh > > http://l-c-n.com/ > > > > Oh dear. Then I'll take this as my answer and move on. > > Nothing more to see here. > > > -- > > Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic | > ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com > > > #663399 > __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] order of rules in a single declaration
Hmm. Ill try that. Never noticed that in my day to day. Thanks. On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 12:54 AM Karl DeSaulnierswrote: > The parser does care somewhat. Depends on the browser > In my research I have found that they load aspects before dynamics. > > Loading the elements basic parameters first like color, background color > then > fonts, font size, line height then width, height and then margins, padding > and then borders, transitions, shadows and then position, clip and display. > > I got this from the inspect element pane and how different browsers > were ordering my css. If you have them out of order, safari would reorder > them > according to their spec and I had found that most other browsers treated > this > the same way and reordered them similarly. > > So it is a yes and no answer with a personal preference included. > Try it for yourself. Put them in the order you want and see how Safari or > chrome or firefox > reorder them respectively. > > For example: > > div{ >width: 100%; >margin: 10px 20px; >padding: 0; >position: relative; >display: block; > } > > Best, > > Karl DeSaulniers > Design Drumm > http://designdrumm.com > > > > > > On Oct 13, 2016, at 10:32 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh > wrote: > > > > > >> On Oct 14, 2016, at 12:13 PM, Tom Livingston wrote: > >> > >> Curious. Does the order of declarations within a single rule matter? > >> Not specificity between rules. > >> > >> For example: > >> > >> div{ > >>position: relative; > >>display: block; > >>width: 100%; > >>margin: 10px 20px; > >>padding: 0; > >> } > >> > >> as opposed to: > >> > >> div{ > >>display: block; > >>margin: 10px 20px; > >>padding: 0; > >>position: relative; > >>width: 100%; > >> } > >> > >> Make any difference? > > > > No. The CSS parser doesn’t care. > > > > For the human eye aka readability of a stylesheet, that is another > matter. Excellent fuel for violent flame wars. > > > > Philippe > > -- > > Philippe Wittenbergh > > http://l-c-n.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > __ > > css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] > > http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d > > List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ > > List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html > > Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ > > __ > css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] > http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d > List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ > List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html > Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] order of rules in a single declaration
The parser does care somewhat. Depends on the browser In my research I have found that they load aspects before dynamics. Loading the elements basic parameters first like color, background color then fonts, font size, line height then width, height and then margins, padding and then borders, transitions, shadows and then position, clip and display. I got this from the inspect element pane and how different browsers were ordering my css. If you have them out of order, safari would reorder them according to their spec and I had found that most other browsers treated this the same way and reordered them similarly. So it is a yes and no answer with a personal preference included. Try it for yourself. Put them in the order you want and see how Safari or chrome or firefox reorder them respectively. For example: div{ width: 100%; margin: 10px 20px; padding: 0; position: relative; display: block; } Best, Karl DeSaulniers Design Drumm http://designdrumm.com > On Oct 13, 2016, at 10:32 PM, Philippe Wittenberghwrote: > > >> On Oct 14, 2016, at 12:13 PM, Tom Livingston wrote: >> >> Curious. Does the order of declarations within a single rule matter? >> Not specificity between rules. >> >> For example: >> >> div{ >>position: relative; >>display: block; >>width: 100%; >>margin: 10px 20px; >>padding: 0; >> } >> >> as opposed to: >> >> div{ >>display: block; >>margin: 10px 20px; >>padding: 0; >>position: relative; >>width: 100%; >> } >> >> Make any difference? > > No. The CSS parser doesn’t care. > > For the human eye aka readability of a stylesheet, that is another matter. > Excellent fuel for violent flame wars. > > Philippe > -- > Philippe Wittenbergh > http://l-c-n.com/ > > > > > > __ > css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] > http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d > List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ > List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html > Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] order of rules in a single declaration
> On Oct 14, 2016, at 12:13 PM, Tom Livingstonwrote: > > Curious. Does the order of declarations within a single rule matter? > Not specificity between rules. > > For example: > > div{ > position: relative; > display: block; > width: 100%; > margin: 10px 20px; > padding: 0; > } > > as opposed to: > > div{ > display: block; > margin: 10px 20px; > padding: 0; > position: relative; > width: 100%; > } > > Make any difference? No. The CSS parser doesn’t care. For the human eye aka readability of a stylesheet, that is another matter. Excellent fuel for violent flame wars. Philippe -- Philippe Wittenbergh http://l-c-n.com/ __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
[css-d] order of rules in a single declaration
List, Curious. Does the order of declarations within a single rule matter? Not specificity between rules. For example: div{ position: relative; display: block; width: 100%; margin: 10px 20px; padding: 0; } as opposed to: div{ display: block; margin: 10px 20px; padding: 0; position: relative; width: 100%; } Make any difference? -- Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic | ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com #663399 __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/