Zoe M. Gillenwater mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Thursday, May 25, 2006 7:39 AM said:
You're right, relative positioning is not useful in the way you are
using it. I would use a negative margin to shift something up like
that. But relative positioning, without applying any offsets, is
Chris W. Parker wrote:
Ingo Chao mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Wednesday, May 24, 2006 1:15 PM said:
This does not sound wrong.
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visuren.html#choose-position
When a box B is relatively positioned, the position of the following
box is calculated as though B
Hello,
I'm just now experimenting with 'position: relative;' and I've come to
find out that even when I place an element outside a div (with
relatively positioned elements inside it) it is still pushed below the
point where the positioned elements WOULD have been (had they not been
positioned).
Chris W. Parker wrote:
Hello,
I'm just now experimenting with 'position: relative;' and I've come to
find out that even when I place an element outside a div (with
relatively positioned elements inside it) it is still pushed below the
point where the positioned elements WOULD have been (had
Ingo Chao mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Wednesday, May 24, 2006 1:15 PM said:
This does not sound wrong.
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visuren.html#choose-position
When a box B is relatively positioned, the position of the following
box is calculated as though B were not offset.
Hmm... then I
Chris W. Parker wrote:
www.swatgear.com/impacst.php
Failure is not an option, uh, so my next proposal is better more correct.
#box_with_button { ... overflow: hidden;}
would prevent IE7 from expanding the height of #box_with_button. (IE6
treats height similar to min-height.)
Further
