On Sat, 25 Aug 2007, Felix Miata wrote:
Note the M$ Vista monospace font Consolas is smaller than traditional
monospace fonts, similar in apparent size to TNR. In fact, all the Vista
fonts are closer together in apparent size than the traditional M$ web fonts.
Although that's good for word
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, Felix Miata wrote:
In Konqueror and all versions of IE, monospace (PRE) is the same size as
proportional.
No, on IE, the default font size of pre elements, as well as tt, code,
kbd, and sample elements, is about 90% of the basic font size.
Things _look_ different, since
On 2007/08/25 14:20 (GMT+0300) Jukka K. Korpela apparently typed:
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, Felix Miata wrote:
In Konqueror and all versions of IE, monospace (PRE) is the same size as
proportional.
No, on IE, the default font size of pre elements, as well as tt, code,
kbd, and sample
On 8/22/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm working for a company in which the boss (who's originally from the
print industry) insists on having equal line lengths in the browsers on
different operating systems.
So in an example text, hello, i'm example text!, if the text
On 2007/08/25 08:10 (GMT+0800) Richard Grevers apparently typed:
Also, pre gets a smaller font size by default in nearly every
browser (13pt vs 16pt, IIRC) so you would at least need to allow for
that.
Safari is 13px vs. 16px, as is Gecko on Mac and windoz. Gecko is 12px vs.
16px on Linux. In
WEZ! wrote:
ohh monospace means each character takes up an equal width so the
width of the character 'i' will be the same as an 'm'
And a boss from a print industry background will immediately consider
that unacceptable!
--
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
authenticity, honesty, community
: [css-d] Differing font-sizes between operating systems
WEZ! wrote:
ohh monospace means each character takes up an equal width so the
width of the character 'i' will be the same as an 'm'
And a boss from a print industry background will immediately consider
that unacceptable
Hi,
I'm working for a company in which the boss (who's originally from the
print industry) insists on having equal line lengths in the browsers on
different operating systems.
So in an example text, hello, i'm example text!, if the text is split to
the following line at example on Firefox
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm working for a company in which the boss (who's originally from the
print industry) insists on having equal line lengths in the browsers on
different operating systems.
Sounds rather odd in several accounts, but on this list, we're supposed to
On 22 Aug 2007, at 10:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm working for a company in which the boss (who's originally from the
print industry) insists on having equal line lengths in the
browsers on
different operating systems.
So in an example text, hello, i'm example text!, if the text is
Rob Stevenson schrieb:
On 22 Aug 2007, at 10:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm working for a company in which the boss (who's originally from the
print industry) insists on having equal line lengths in the
browsers on
different operating systems.
So in an example text, hello, i'm example
Hi Rob,
I had to do something similar for a site owned by a 'print person'
who insisted that lines be the recommended-for-reading-in-books
length of somewhere around 7 words per line.
It was a simple matter to specify the width of the containing
element (the site's old enough that this
On 22/8/07 (17:54) Thorsten said:
The containing element's width is fixed, that didn't help any, alas. I
checked on Firefox/Win and Safari/Win and had to add in a few
line-breaks for Safari where Firefox's text flow already worked
normally. That sucks for longer texts of course and is at best
On 22/8/07 (17:54) Thorsten said:
The containing element's width is fixed, that didn't help any, alas. I
checked on Firefox/Win and Safari/Win and had to add in a few
line-breaks for Safari where Firefox's text flow already worked
normally. That sucks for longer texts of course and is at best
14 matches
Mail list logo
