I took your advice Tom and Scott...
http://www.westga.edu/~webgroup/design/code/
Does anybody see anymore issues?
Thanks,
Madison
On Jul 31, 2006, at 2:11 PM, Scott Sauyet wrote:
Generally, I would suggest that your site not be so pixel-perfect
that one or two rescales destroys your look
I thought it would be a good idea to have some external people check
the CSS to this redesign, so I looked at SiteCheckPlease page on the
wiki...
http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=SiteCheckPlease
It wasn't quite clear, but I tried it anyway and got an: Error
executing database
http://www.westga.edu/~webgroup/design/code/
Scaling text down in FF (Mac) wreaks havoc. Secondary page loses it
after 2 clicks up in size...
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
Thanks Tom.
Do people often scale text down like that?
--
Madison
On Jul 31, 2006, at 1:46 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
http://www.westga.edu/~webgroup/design/code/
Scaling text down in FF (Mac) wreaks havoc. Secondary page loses it
after 2 clicks up in size...
--
Tom Livingston |
Madison Bryan wrote:
I thought it would be a good idea to have some external people
Gosh, I never thought of my self as an 'external person,' although I've
been called a lot worse :-) ...
check
the CSS to this redesign, so I looked at SiteCheckPlease page on the
wiki...
Madison Bryan wrote:
Do people often scale text down like that?
I often do, and not just for site check reasons. If the text is large
enough that I'm comfortable reading more per line than is shown, I'll
hit the trusty CTRL-minus, and if I'm having trouble reading small text,
I'll hit
Shane Porter wrote:
I'd be extremely grateful if you guys could check over my first site:
http://www.freshclickmedia.com/previews/endo/home.htm
Any other comments are extremely welcome.
Shane.
XP_SP2 @1280
It seems to work well on my end, Shane(my first site was upside down and
