Re: [css-d] SiteCheckPlease
I took your advice Tom and Scott... http://www.westga.edu/~webgroup/design/code/ Does anybody see anymore issues? Thanks, Madison On Jul 31, 2006, at 2:11 PM, Scott Sauyet wrote: Generally, I would suggest that your site not be so pixel-perfect that one or two rescales destroys your look and feel. I don't feel that it's necessary for the layout to scale to an arbitrary size, but one or two adjustments is probably a good idea. __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
[css-d] SiteCheckPlease
I thought it would be a good idea to have some external people check the CSS to this redesign, so I looked at SiteCheckPlease page on the wiki... http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=SiteCheckPlease It wasn't quite clear, but I tried it anyway and got an: Error executing database query So anyway, I decided just to send an email asking for a site check... http://www.westga.edu/~webgroup/design/code/ ...and the 2nd level page design... http://www.westga.edu/~webgroup/design/code/about.html Thanks, Madison __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] SiteCheckPlease
http://www.westga.edu/~webgroup/design/code/ Scaling text down in FF (Mac) wreaks havoc. Secondary page loses it after 2 clicks up in size... -- Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic | ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] SiteCheckPlease
Thanks Tom. Do people often scale text down like that? -- Madison On Jul 31, 2006, at 1:46 PM, Tom Livingston wrote: http://www.westga.edu/~webgroup/design/code/ Scaling text down in FF (Mac) wreaks havoc. Secondary page loses it after 2 clicks up in size... -- Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic | ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] SiteCheckPlease
Madison Bryan wrote: I thought it would be a good idea to have some external people Gosh, I never thought of my self as an 'external person,' although I've been called a lot worse :-) ... check the CSS to this redesign, so I looked at SiteCheckPlease page on the wiki... http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=SiteCheckPlease I think that is out of date and needs to be deleted? It wasn't quite clear, but I tried it anyway and got an: Error executing database query So anyway, I decided just to send an email asking for a site check... You came to the right place(maybe). http://www.westga.edu/~webgroup/design/code/ ...and the 2nd level page design... http://www.westga.edu/~webgroup/design/code/about.html Madison A site with valid html and css is always different(that's the fist thing that usually gets hammered). Nice visual. Sometimes the visuals are getting in the way of delivering the content, though. The flower/flame(?) shape gets unwieldy on font zoom( I like the 5 nice tints of blue seen with images disabled better-- and the close up shot of the young lady scares me.).In general the home page is working better than the about page(compare with +2 font zoom in ff or text-size largest in ie). Would changing 81% for the font-size on the body to 100% freak out the internal people(I can never understand why public libraries and institutions of higher learning insist on making the printed word difficult tor read)? So, despite my goofy personal opinions, it is a nice, well executed site that just needs a little more rigorous testing and tweaking. Best, ~dL PS UWG Logo(with images disabled) might be better set: University of West Georgia. And if you want to get corny, set the content p 100% Georgia. __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] SiteCheckPlease
Madison Bryan wrote: Do people often scale text down like that? I often do, and not just for site check reasons. If the text is large enough that I'm comfortable reading more per line than is shown, I'll hit the trusty CTRL-minus, and if I'm having trouble reading small text, I'll hit CTRL-plus. It's easy and makes the site conform to my preferences. Generally, I would suggest that your site not be so pixel-perfect that one or two rescales destroys your look and feel. I don't feel that it's necessary for the layout to scale to an arbitrary size, but one or two adjustments is probably a good idea. -- Scott __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] SiteCheckPlease
Shane Porter wrote: I'd be extremely grateful if you guys could check over my first site: http://www.freshclickmedia.com/previews/endo/home.htm Any other comments are extremely welcome. Shane. XP_SP2 @1280 It seems to work well on my end, Shane(my first site was upside down and backward). 34 screen captures: http://www.browsercam.com/public.aspx?proj_id=201361 You are getting lateral page shift at high screen resolution. You might check this article out regarding that:http://www.hicksdesign.co.uk/journal/forcing-scrollbars-now-even-better regards, ~dL -- David Laakso http://www.dlaakso.com __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
