Jack Blankenships wrote:
> It seems to be that the table within the div or body element is
> pushing the content out beyond the specified widths in Internet
> Explorer. [...]
If you have problems: link to the case, page, you have problems with.
Bits of CSS don't make much sense without it.
rega
Jack Blankenships wrote:
> Apparently there was a table there as well, and max-width does not
> apply to a table very nicely in Safari or Internet Explorer. Can
> anyone offer some more explanation on this?
Have only tested for CSS table a year or so back, and it's a known
behavior in Safari 3.
It seems to be that the table within the div or body element is
pushing the content out beyond the specified widths in Internet
Explorer. If I set the width on the table to 100% it forces the
containing dom element to expand if the elements within the table can
possibly have a width to do so (that
After experimenting some more I have come up with some code that seems
to work in most browsers:
.content {
width:100%;
max-width:960px;
min-width:640px;
margin-left: auto;
margin-right: auto;
}
This can be applied to a body or div tag with an embedded table a
Apparently there was a table there as well, and max-width does not
apply to a table very nicely in Safari or Internet Explorer. Can
anyone offer some more explanation on this?
Thanks,
Jack
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 9:50 AM, Jack Blankenships
wrote:
> Apparently there was a table there as well, an
Is there a way to get a max-width attribute to work in Safari and
Internet Explorer? Supposedly both browsers suppourt it, but I can't
find an example of either doing so.
In theory I would like to add a class to a div like so:
.container {
width:100%;
max-width: 960px;
}
I would
