Re: [css-d] Site check please IE9/10

2013-09-11 Thread Albert van der Veen
Thanks for the feedback, had it fixed. Turned out to be a problem with closing a button tag. I closed it like this: button type=submit title=Search class=searchbutton / which completely(!) messed up the page. Now it's closed this way button type=submit title=Search class=searchbutton /button

Re: [css-d] Site check please IE9/10

2013-09-11 Thread Alan Gresley
On 11/09/2013 7:01 PM, Albert van der Veen wrote: Thanks for the feedback, had it fixed. Turned out to be a problem with closing a button tag. I closed it like this: button type=submit title=Search class=searchbutton / which completely(!) messed up the page. Now it's closed this way button

Re: [css-d] Site check please IE9/10

2013-09-04 Thread Eric
David, I really don't see how the three HTML errors would case his problem. And, you might want to check the CSS before running a validation. He's using CSS3 that validation does not appear to have been run under CSS3 but rather CSS2.1 making the error irrelevant. And, even if they were the only

Re: [css-d] Site check please IE9/10

2013-09-04 Thread Eric
Albert, I'm not seeing your problem. Have your fixed it? On September 3, 2013 at 8:20 AM Albert van der Veen albert.lijs...@xs4all.nl wrote: Hi all, I'm working on a new site and just found out it looks (and works, as you can't even click any link) awful in IE8/9 and good in IE10. Can

[css-d] Site check please IE9/10

2013-09-03 Thread Albert van der Veen
Hi all, I'm working on a new site and just found out it looks (and works, as you can't even click any link) awful in IE8/9 and good in IE10. Can anyone see whether IE8/9 are choking on something that IE10 has no problems with? I can't imagine css differences between IE9 and 10 being so huge

Re: [css-d] Site check please IE9/10

2013-09-03 Thread David Postill
On Tue, 03 Sep 2013 14:20:01 +0200, Albert van der Veen wrote: | Hi all, | | I'm working on a new site and just found out it looks (and works, as you | can't even click any link) awful in IE8/9 and good in IE10. Can anyone | see whether IE8/9 are choking on something that IE10 has no problems

[css-d] site check please

2012-05-20 Thread Erik Visser
Can you please view this website and give me your comments? Especially from technical point of view. Any quirks or strange behaviour or whatever? I hope i will get an overview of how this site works/acts on different browsers and platforms. http://beta.sterrenhofje.nl Thank you, Erik Visser

Re: [css-d] site check please

2012-05-20 Thread mem
Can you please view this website and give me your comments? Especially from technical point of view. Any quirks or strange behaviour or whatever? I hope i will get an overview of how this site works/acts on different browsers and platforms. http://beta.sterrenhofje.nl If you wish to

Re: [css-d] site check please

2012-05-20 Thread David Laakso
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 6:00 AM, Erik Visser e...@erikvisser.net wrote: I hope i will get an overview of how this site works/acts on different browsers and platforms. http://beta.sterrenhofje.nl Thank you, Erik Visser The pages in the site seem to perform as expected in a Windows

Re: [css-d] Site check please

2009-11-08 Thread Ed Goodson
in the right place? Thank-you very much, Kind Regards, Ed - Original Message - From: Theresa Mesa trixiesirishe...@gmail.com To: Norman Fournier nor...@normanfournier.com Cc: CSS Discuss css-d@lists.css-discuss.org Sent: Saturday, November 07, 2009 8:20 PM Subject: Re: [css-d] Site check

Re: [css-d] Site check please

2009-11-08 Thread Ed Goodson
- Original Message - From: Theresa Mesa trixiesirishe...@gmail.com To: Norman Fournier nor...@normanfournier.com Cc: CSS Discuss css-d@lists.css-discuss.org Sent: Saturday, November 07, 2009 8:20 PM Subject: Re: [css-d] Site check please Well, according to your source code

Re: [css-d] Site check please

2009-11-08 Thread Theresa Mesa
...@gmail.com To: Norman Fournier nor...@normanfournier.com Cc: CSS Discuss css-d@lists.css-discuss.org Sent: Saturday, November 07, 2009 8:20 PM Subject: Re: [css-d] Site check please Well, according to your source code, there's supposed to be a logo there, called LOGO.jpg. Doesn't look

Re: [css-d] Site check please

2009-11-08 Thread David Laakso
Ed Goodson wrote: http://www.copywritecolombia.com/test.html I do have an issue on IE though at the moment, the text string: Header2 and the text below is not showing within the confines of the grey background image. How can I make sure that this shows in the

Re: [css-d] Site check please

2009-11-07 Thread Theresa Mesa
Well, according to your source code, there's supposed to be a logo there, called LOGO.jpg. Doesn't look like the image is on the server. Did you upload the images folder to the server? Is the logo in the images folder? Theresa On Nov 5, 2009, at 3:01 PM, Norman Fournier wrote: Safari

[css-d] Site check please

2009-11-04 Thread Ed Goodson
Hi all, Please could someone kindly test this on IE- especially 6. It looks fine to me on ff The page is tentatively passed xhtml strict. http://www.copywritecolombia.com/test.html Thank-you very much, Cheers, Ed __ css-discuss

Re: [css-d] Site check please

2009-11-04 Thread Birdie
Hi all, Please could someone kindly test this on IE- especially 6. It looks fine to me on ff The page is tentatively passed xhtml strict. http://www.copywritecolombia.com/test.html; Seems to look the same for me in FF and IE 6 on windows. Posted screen shot here for IE6 for you:

Re: [css-d] Site check please

2009-11-04 Thread Theresa Mesa
What kind of things are you looking for us to find? On Nov 4, 2009, at 3:16 PM, Ed Goodson wrote: Hi all, Please could someone kindly test this on IE- especially 6. It looks fine to me on ff The page is tentatively passed xhtml strict. http://www.copywritecolombia.com/test.html

Re: [css-d] Site check please

2009-07-17 Thread David Laakso
Lorraine Barte Nepomuceno wrote: Hi guys, So far, I've tested this layout in Mac Firefox Safari, and Windows Firefox IE8. I'd love any feedback you might have- especially viewed in other browsers and resolutions. http://www.splashscreen.com/sample/sample.html Thanks very much, Lorraine

Re: [css-d] Site check please

2009-07-17 Thread Lorraine Barte Nepomuceno
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 10:18 PM, David Laakso da...@chelseacreekstudio.com wrote: David Laakso wrote: Lorraine, Getting your page functional in IE 6/7 required hacking it from here to Havana. And it still was not right. If you need to keep your current markup, then someone else on the

Re: [css-d] Site check please

2009-07-17 Thread David Laakso
David Laakso wrote: Lorraine Barte Nepomuceno wrote: Hi David, Can you reload the page? I've made some changes (I think my calculations for layout size were wrong :-))... please let me know if it's better now: http://www.splashscreen.com/sample/sample.html thanks very much

[css-d] Site check please

2009-07-16 Thread Lorraine Barte Nepomuceno
Hi guys, So far, I've tested this layout in Mac Firefox Safari, and Windows Firefox IE8. I'd love any feedback you might have- especially viewed in other browsers and resolutions. http://www.splashscreen.com/sample/sample.html Thanks very much, Lorraine

Re: [css-d] Site check please

2009-07-16 Thread Erik Vorhes
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Lorraine Barte Nepomucenowebmistr...@splashscreen.com wrote: So far, I've tested this layout in Mac Firefox Safari, and Windows Firefox IE8. I'd love any feedback you might have- especially viewed in other browsers and resolutions.

Re: [css-d] Site check please

2009-07-16 Thread David Laakso
Lorraine Barte Nepomuceno wrote: Thanks for your reply, David- although I do admit I am confused by some of it... what are rivers? I'd appreciate any ideas you might have on what I've done wrong in my CSS as well... thanks again :) Lorraine Think of the text-block as a piece of fine

Re: [css-d] Site check please

2009-07-16 Thread David Laakso
Lorraine Barte Nepomuceno wrote: Hi David, Can you reload the page? I've made some changes (I think my calculations for layout size were wrong :-))... please let me know if it's better now: http://www.splashscreen.com/sample/sample.html thanks very much Lorraine For a lot of

Re: [css-d] Site check please

2009-05-20 Thread Ib Jensen
2009/5/20 David Laakso da...@chelseacreekstudio.com: Ib Jensen wrote: Dunno, but it may be IE/6 is not honoring the advanced selector for the missing icons-- but does it really matter? Of more importance (?),  may be that neither of the more important content images in the right column,

Re: [css-d] Site check please

2009-05-20 Thread David Laakso
Ib Jensen wrote: 2009/5/20 David Laakso da...@chelseacreekstudio.com: Ib Jensen wrote: Dunno, but it may be IE/6 is not honoring the advanced selector for the missing icons-- but does it really matter? Of more importance (?), may be that neither of the more important content

Re: [css-d] Site check please

2009-05-20 Thread Ib Jensen
2009/5/20 David Laakso da...@chelseacreekstudio.com: Ib Jensen wrote: 2009/5/20 David Laakso da...@chelseacreekstudio.com: Ib Jensen wrote: This star html hack will set the fixed width for IE/6. Leave it in the CSS file. Or, if you prefer, put it in an IE/6 conditional comment. It will

[css-d] Site check please

2009-05-19 Thread Ib Jensen
Hi Link: http://ikjensen.dk Tested locally in FF 3.0.10 - IE 6/78 (IETester 0.3.3) Locally known issues: IE6 dont show my link-icons IE7 - 8 behave rather ok. As FF3. At 190% Page- or Text-zoom?: IE6: Arghhh The template _are_ not made for IE6! IE7: Page got a horizontal

Re: [css-d] Site check please

2009-05-19 Thread David Laakso
Ib Jensen wrote: Hi Link: http://ikjensen.dk Tested locally in FF 3.0.10 - IE 6/78 (IETester 0.3.3) Locally known issues: IE6 dont show my link-icons IE7 - 8 behave rather ok. As FF3. At 190% Page- or Text-zoom?: IE6: Arghhh The template _are_ not made for IE6!

Re: [css-d] site check please?

2009-05-18 Thread Bill Brown
Chris Blake wrote: And 'stop the presses' is wrong, 'press' is plural. Uhh, not always, and certainly not when used as Jody is using it: as part of the age old saying: Stop the presses. This goes way back to the days of the printing press and refers literally to stopping the printing presses

Re: [css-d] site check please?

2009-05-18 Thread Jody Levinson
wow, thank you for the screen shot. I will adjust. On May 17, 2009, at 9:06 PM, David Laakso wrote: Jody Levinson wrote: Hi, all, I've created this site: http://evamoon.net and it looks all right as far as I can see in FF and current versions of IE, but when I open the pages in

Re: [css-d] site check please?

2009-05-18 Thread Jody Levinson
Hi Chris Actually, as Bill points out, stop the presses is correct in this sense. It refers to when a late breaking important news story would come in to a newspaper after the edition was already on the printing press. They'd stop the printing presses to update. The image at the bottom is

Re: [css-d] site check please?

2009-05-18 Thread Jody Levinson
On May 17, 2009, at 7:30 PM, Jody Levinson wrote: Hi, all, I've created this site: http://evamoon.net and it looks all right as far as I can see in FF and current versions of IE, but when I open the pages in DreamWeaver the left sidebar appears in the lower right and the navbar position

Re: [css-d] site check please?

2009-05-18 Thread Tim Snadden
On 19/05/2009, at 3:57 AM, Jody Levinson wrote: The image at the bottom is just a plain old transparent gif with a black mask. I'm not wild about how the mask shows over a light background, but no mask leaves jaggedy edges on the hands. It's a tradeoff. The way around this is to save the

[css-d] Site check please

2009-05-18 Thread Ib Jensen
Hi Link: http://ikjensen.dk Tested locally in FF 3.0.10 - IE 6/78 (IETester 0.3.3) Locally known issues: IE6 dont show my link-icons IE7 - 8 behave rather ok. As FF3. At 190% Page- or Text-zoom: IE6: Ahhh The template not made for IE6! IE7: Page got a horizontal scroll-bar,

Re: [css-d] site check please?

2009-05-18 Thread Felix Miata
On 2009/05/17 19:30 (GMT-0700) Jody Levinson composed: I've created this site: http://evamoon.net and it looks all right as far as I can see in FF and current versions of IE, but when I open the pages in DreamWeaver the left sidebar appears in the lower right and the navbar position

[css-d] site check please?

2009-05-17 Thread Jody Levinson
Hi, all, I've created this site: http://evamoon.net and it looks all right as far as I can see in FF and current versions of IE, but when I open the pages in DreamWeaver the left sidebar appears in the lower right and the navbar position overlaps the top of the content area. I don't

Re: [css-d] site check please?

2009-05-17 Thread David Laakso
Jody Levinson wrote: Hi, all, I've created this site: http://evamoon.net and it looks all right as far as I can see in FF and current versions of IE, but when I open the pages in DreamWeaver the left sidebar appears in the lower right and the navbar position overlaps the top of the

Re: [css-d] site check please?

2009-05-17 Thread Chris Blake
On 18/05/2009, at 12:06 PM, David Laakso wrote: Jody Levinson wrote: Hi, all, I've created this site: http://evamoon.net and it looks all right as far as I can see in FF and current versions of IE, but when I open the pages in DreamWeaver the left sidebar appears in the lower right

Re: [css-d] Site check please...

2009-04-17 Thread Luis Speciale
Michael Beaudoin a écrit : I'm fleshing out a new site. I thought I'm doing this is as simple a manner as possible to not induce any anomalies, but I'm having some issues. What I can see off the bat... - In Safari, the logo on the right doesn't show (it does in Firefox IE) This

Re: [css-d] Site check please...

2009-04-17 Thread Ian Young
Subject: [css-d] Site check please... I'm fleshing out a new site. I thought I'm doing this is as simple a manner as possible to not induce any anomalies, but I'm having some issues. What I can see off the bat... - In Safari, the logo on the right doesn't show (it does in Firefox IE

[css-d] Site check please...

2009-04-16 Thread Michael Beaudoin
I'm fleshing out a new site. I thought I'm doing this is as simple a manner as possible to not induce any anomalies, but I'm having some issues. What I can see off the bat... - In Safari, the logo on the right doesn't show (it does in Firefox IE) - I've put the large type (our firm) at

[css-d] Site Check Please - Cedar Lake Inn

2008-11-13 Thread Peter Hyde-Smith
11/13/2008 I'd appreciate a check of these four pages, http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIbanquet.html, http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIbanquetmenu.html, http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIbanquetpolicies.html,

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please - Cedar Lake Inn

2008-11-13 Thread David Laakso
Peter Hyde-Smith wrote: 11/13/2008 I'd appreciate a check of these four pages, http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIbanquetmenu.html, http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIbanquetpolicies.html, http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIbanquetphotogallery.html. Peter

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please: Cedar Lake Inn - Round #2

2008-10-28 Thread Nancy Johnson
The height issue is definitely fixed in IE6. The entity issue is only an issue in the address line, but is not an issue in the times that the restaurant is open, yet uses some of the same bullets. Can you use the same coding for the bullets in the address line that you use in the times that the

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please: Cedar Lake Inn - Round #2

2008-10-28 Thread wwwebpro
, at 3:26 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 03:30:07 +0100 From: Gunlaug S?rtun [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [css-d] Site Check Please: Cedar Lake Inn - Round #2 To: Peter Hyde-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org, David Laakso

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please: Cedar Lake Inn

2008-10-27 Thread Nancy Johnson
The height attribute in IE6 are not displaying correctly, The image on the homepage is 1/2 high and the first line of address is cut so only the bottom half shows. It could be because IE6 doesn't recognize min-height. Nancy On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 7:25 PM, David Laakso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please: Cedar Lake Inn

2008-10-27 Thread Frynge Customer Support
505 (United Kingdom) - Original Message - From: Peter Hyde-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2008 3:27 PM Subject: [css-d] Site Check Please: Cedar Lake Inn 10/25/2008 Nefore I get much further, would appreciate a site check of new

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please: Cedar Lake Inn

2008-10-27 Thread David Laakso
Nancy Johnson wrote: The height attribute in IE6 are not displaying correctly, The image on the homepage is 1/2 high and the first line of address is cut so only the bottom half shows. It could be because IE6 doesn't recognize min-height. Nancy Peter Hyde-Smith wrote:

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please: Cedar Lake Inn

2008-10-27 Thread Nancy Johnson
You could try that. I have done the same thing and it works. Nancy On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:49 AM, David Laakso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nancy Johnson wrote: The height attribute in IE6 are not displaying correctly, The image on the homepage is 1/2 high and the first line of address is

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please: Cedar Lake Inn - Round #2

2008-10-27 Thread Peter Hyde-Smith
- Original Message - From: David Laakso [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Peter Hyde-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Nancy Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]; css-d@lists.css-discuss.org Sent: Monday, October 27, 2008 10:49 AM Subject: Re: [css-d] Site Check Please: Cedar Lake Inn Peter Hyde-Smith wrote: http

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please: Cedar Lake Inn - Round #2

2008-10-27 Thread David Laakso
Peter Hyde-Smith wrote: http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIindex.html http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIdining.html http://www.fatpawdesign.com 1/ Dunno. Clear the cache? No got Avant here. I do not see the large gap you mention in any of my XP or Mac OS X 10.4.11

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please: Cedar Lake Inn - Round #2

2008-10-27 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
David Laakso wrote: Peter Hyde-Smith wrote: http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIindex.html http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIdining.html http://www.fatpawdesign.com 1/ Dunno. Clear the cache? No got Avant here. I do not see the large gap you mention in any of

[css-d] Site Check Please: Cedar Lake Inn

2008-10-25 Thread Peter Hyde-Smith
10/25/2008 Nefore I get much further, would appreciate a site check of new Cedar Lake Inn index page and one interior page here, http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIindex.html http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIdining.html

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please: Cedar Lake Inn

2008-10-25 Thread David Laakso
Peter Hyde-Smith wrote: 10/25/2008 Nefore I get much further, would appreciate a site check of new Cedar Lake Inn index page and one interior page here, http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIindex.html http://www.fatpawdesign.com/CedarLakeInn/CLIdining.html

[css-d] Site check please - DAC

2008-10-08 Thread Calliope Georgousi
Hi *Peter, I am new member and I am still finding my feet in this forum. I happen to have a similar problem, have tried everything and even though I am just a placement student , the professional staff doesn't know how to deal with this as well. so I created this website and no matter whether I

[css-d] Site check please - DAC

2008-10-07 Thread Peter Hyde-Smith
10/06/2008 Would appreciate a general site check, please, especially in IE6. No breakage issues in OS and browsers noted below. I am also interested to know if the Gilder/Levin image replacement in the header is working. If it isn't, you'll see plain text *The Drug Affected Children Website* (it

Re: [css-d] Site check please - DAC

2008-10-07 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
Peter Hyde-Smith wrote: Would appreciate a general site check, please, especially in IE6. No breakage issues in OS and browsers noted below. I am also interested to know if the Gilder/Levin image replacement in the header is working. Ok in IE6.

Re: [css-d] Site check please - DAC

2008-10-07 Thread David Laakso
Peter Hyde-Smith wrote: 10/06/2008 Would appreciate a general site check, please, especially in IE6. No breakage issues in OS and browsers noted below. I am also interested to know if the Gilder/Levin image replacement in the header is working. Peter O.K. Mac OS X 10.4.11 Opera,

Re: [css-d] Site check please - DAC *round 2*

2008-10-07 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
Peter Hyde-Smith wrote: http://www.fatpawdesign.com/DAC/DACproducts.html All: Thanks for the look-see and feed-back. Georg: I think I have the transparent borders issue fixed. Would you please make another quick check? Borders ok. IE6 need a little bit more help though. 1: There's the

[css-d] Site Check please (IE6 ideally)

2008-06-30 Thread WEZ!
Heya all, Just done some footer work on this page and want to know if the page is rendering without flaws in most peoples browsers. http://cedd.raez.net/cedd.html I've ran it through all the modern browsers on my work Mac and if anyone ideally could put it through its paces on IE6 that would

Re: [css-d] Site Check please (IE6 ideally)

2008-06-30 Thread Susan Grossman
Just done some footer work on this page and want to know if the page is rendering without flaws in most peoples browsers. http://cedd.raez.net/cedd.html It does not render correctly in IE6 - the Gray areas (designed by and other) one floats all the way to the left and the other all the way

Re: [css-d] Site Check please (IE6 ideally)

2008-06-30 Thread David Hucklesby
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 19:39:46 +0800, WEZ! wrote: Heya all, Just done some footer work on this page and want to know if the page is rendering without flaws in most peoples browsers. http://cedd.raez.net/cedd.html I've ran it through all the modern browsers on my work Mac and if anyone

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please

2008-06-27 Thread David Laakso
Professional Web Pages - Information wrote: Dear David, Thank you for your feedback - my apologies for a late response. What is the suggestion/recommendation/community view for font formatting with CSS? Regards PWP Would you please provide feedback for the website

[css-d] Site Check Please

2008-06-23 Thread Professional Web Pages - Information
To whom it may concern, Would you please provide feedback for the website http://www.AMSvet.com.au/ Thank you. Regards PWP __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ --

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please

2008-06-23 Thread David Laakso
Professional Web Pages - Information wrote: Would you please provide feedback for the website http://www.AMSvet.com.au/ Thank you. Regards PWP Is the blue block offset 24px on the left intentional? Some folks may have trouble with the tiny frozen fonts in IE. And not everyone will

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please

2008-06-23 Thread Alan K Baker
- Original Message - From: Professional Web Pages - Information To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 9:43 PM Subject: [css-d] Site Check Please To whom it may concern, Would you please provide feedback for the website http://www.AMSvet.com.au

Re: [css-d] Site check please...

2008-06-04 Thread Rob freeman
on the Order, FAQ and Contact US pages the leftcolumn-two div contains a child div called post which has some padding. This shifts all content down and across, not sure if this is intentional. lister 2008/6/3 Michael Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Tue, 03 Jun 2008 12:22:49 -0700 (PDT) Raven

Re: [css-d] Site check please...

2008-06-03 Thread Raven Gildea
Hi all, May I request a site check please? It all looks okay on my own Mac and PC browsers, but I'd like to hear of any weirdness you might see that I don't: http://www.sweetlorrainebakeshop.com/ Thanks very much! Lorraine Hi Lorraine: I'm seeing two small issues in IE5/Mac. On the

Re: [css-d] Site check please...

2008-06-03 Thread Michael Adams
On Tue, 03 Jun 2008 12:22:49 -0700 (PDT) Raven Gildea wrote: Hi all, May I request a site check please? It all looks okay on my own Mac and PC browsers, but I'd like to hear of any weirdness you might see that I don't: http://www.sweetlorrainebakeshop.com/ Thanks very much!

[css-d] Site check please...

2008-06-02 Thread Lorraine Barte Nepomuceno
Hi all, May I request a site check please? It all looks okay on my own Mac and PC browsers, but I'd like to hear of any weirdness you might see that I don't: http://www.sweetlorrainebakeshop.com/ Thanks very much! Lorraine __

Re: [css-d] Site check please...

2008-06-02 Thread David Laakso
Lorraine Barte Nepomuceno wrote: Hi all, May I request a site check please? It all looks okay on my own Mac and PC browsers, but I'd like to hear of any weirdness you might see that I don't: http://www.sweetlorrainebakeshop.com/ Thanks very much! Lorraine Looked fine to me in Mac

Re: [css-d] Site check please...

2008-06-02 Thread Melbeach
Hi all, May I request a site check please? It all looks okay on my own Mac and PC browsers, but I'd like to hear of any weirdness you might see that I don't: http://www.sweetlorrainebakeshop.com/ Thanks very much! Lorraine Everything works for me in Windows IE6 and Firefox. Only thing -

Re: [css-d] Site Check please

2008-05-30 Thread David Hucklesby
On Thu, 29 May 2008 12:10:39 -0400, David Laakso wrote: re: http://www.sarahbutler.org.uk/index.html One way of doing some of that stuff is to set min/max width and shove the menu to the left. A work around for min/max for IE/6 is needed (6 does not support min/max). [...] Please see:

[css-d] Site Check please

2008-05-29 Thread Peter Bradley
Could someone please check just the home page for me at: http://www.sarahbutler.org.uk/index.html My client tells me that the photo obscures some of the text using FireFox on a Mac. I don't have a Mac to check it on, but it seems fine everywhere else ... I wonder if it's a screen

Re: [css-d] Site Check please

2008-05-29 Thread Peter Bradley
Ysgrifennodd Peter Bradley: Could someone please check just the home page for me at: http://www.sarahbutler.org.uk/index.html Sorry to reply to myself, but I've sorted it. It *was* a screen-size thing. I checked it out on my wife's eee PC. I've now given the photo a width of 80% and

Re: [css-d] Site Check please

2008-05-29 Thread Peter Bradley
Ysgrifennodd Konstantin Kuchugurin: Piter try this p div style=position:relative;float:left;margin:10px 10px 0px 0px;width:Your_Pic_Width_Size_px;height:Your_Pic_Height_Size_px;img src=image_folder/Your_Image.jpg alt= //div Some text ... Much more text... :) /p This will be

Re: [css-d] Site Check please

2008-05-29 Thread David Laakso
Peter Bradley wrote: Ysgrifennodd Peter Bradley: http://www.sarahbutler.org.uk/index.html If anyone has any comments on the site, though, I'd be very pleased to get any feedback. I'm a bit of a newbie to this CSS stuff, so any suggestions would be very gratefully received.

Re: [css-d] Site Check please

2008-05-29 Thread Peter Bradley
Ysgrifennodd David Laakso: Kind of like a long line measure at 116.5 dpi. Sorry for being thick, but I don't understand that. It's a bit of terminology I've missed, I think. Pixel font-sizes are not very user friendly. Yes, you're absolutely right. I hadn't realised I'd done that. Must

Re: [css-d] Site Check please

2008-05-29 Thread David Laakso
Peter Bradley wrote: Ysgrifennodd David Laakso: Kind of like a long line measure at 116.5 dpi. Sorry for being thick, but I don't understand that. It's a bit of terminology I've missed, I think. re: http://www.sarahbutler.org.uk/index.html Let's just say, for the sake of

Re: [css-d] Site Check please

2008-05-29 Thread Peter Bradley
Ysgrifennodd David Laakso: Let's just say, for the sake of simplicity, that the length of the lines of primary content text (measure) may be a little long for those who view the page at screen resolution 1280 and higher (particularly in laptops). Ah. OK. Got you. I agree, as well,

Re: [css-d] Site Check please

2008-05-29 Thread David Laakso
Peter Bradley wrote: There are a couple of other things I've noticed, which someone might be able to help with: * Is there any way of stopping the navigation menu from wrapping when the screen size gets smaller. I'd prefer horizontal scroll bars, if it's possible * In IE6, the menu

Re: [css-d] Site Check please

2008-05-29 Thread Peter Bradley
Ysgrifennodd David Laakso: re: http://www.sarahbutler.org.uk/index.html One way of doing some of that stuff is to set min/max width and shove the menu to the left. A work around for min/max for IE/6 is needed (6 does not support min/max). This will avoid the h-scroll bar. The menu will

Re: [css-d] site check please

2008-05-27 Thread Rob freeman
thanks for the feedback guys... 2008/5/27 David Laakso [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Rob freeman wrote: nearly there, please can you check this site for any obvious pitfalls... http://www.nest-life.com/update/ thanks No major issues that I could see in compliant browsers, or IE/6 IE/7. The

Re: [css-d] site check please - WHIWB

2008-05-23 Thread Peter Hyde-Smith
Would appreciate a site check/thorough vetting of www.whitehouseinwestbend.com http://www.whitehouseinwestbend.com/whitehousebaseformatcss.css http://www.whitehouseinwestbend.com/whitehousepagecss.css Comments regarding ease of use/accessibility, fonts, colors, etc always welcome.

Re: [css-d] site check please - WHIWB

2008-05-23 Thread David Laakso
Peter Hyde-Smith wrote: Would appreciate a site check/thorough vetting of www.whitehouseinwestbend.com http://www.whitehouseinwestbend.com/whitehousebaseformatcss.css http://www.whitehouseinwestbend.com/whitehousepagecss.css Peter David: Thanks. I set the margins to -2px; and

Re: [css-d] Site Check please

2008-05-22 Thread Karl Hardisty
On 22/05/2008, at 12:39 AM, David Laakso wrote: Karl Hardisty wrote: http://mothership.co.nz/blog All feedback greatly accepted. Karl It looked fine to me cross-browser, Karl. Couple of trivial CSS errors to correct. Aside: The title of the document does not seem to appear in the

[css-d] site check please - WHIWB

2008-05-22 Thread Peter Hyde-Smith
05/22/2008 Hi All: Would appreciate a site check/thorough vetting of www.whitehouseinwestbend.com http://www.whitehouseinwestbend.com/whitehousebaseformatcss.css http://www.whitehouseinwestbend.com/whitehousepagecss.css Comments regarding ease of use/accessibility, fonts, colors, etc always

[css-d] Site Check please

2008-05-21 Thread Karl Hardisty
http://mothership.co.nz/blog Our blog uses GridFocus from 5thirtyone.com with some custom modifications. Just now I've swapped the first and second columns around as I prefer the larger column to be in the centre, as (to me) it looks more proportioned. I've checked it in OS X: Safari 3+,

Re: [css-d] Site Check please

2008-05-21 Thread David Laakso
Karl Hardisty wrote: http://mothership.co.nz/blog All feedback greatly accepted. Karl It looked fine to me cross-browser, Karl. Couple of trivial CSS errors to correct. Aside: The title of the document does not seem to appear in the text. Font-scaling breaks the long word

[css-d] Site Check Please

2008-04-25 Thread Matthew Stoneback
As usual, I am back on the forum asking for a site check. Here are my known issues (as far as I can tell one is only visible in IE6 IE7): IE6 IE7 issue: The main navigation area located in the upper left area has spaces between the images I am using as links. This does not display this way in

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please

2008-04-25 Thread David Laakso
Matthew Stoneback wrote: IE6 IE7 issue: The main navigation area located in the upper left area has spaces between the images I am using as links. This does not display this way in any other browser (that I am aware of). They appear to be approximately 2 to 3 pixels in height. I may

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please: IE 6 / CSS Zen Garden Project

2008-04-15 Thread Valerie Wininger
Vizcaino To: CSS Discuss Sent: Monday, April 14, 2008 9:31 PM Subject: [css-d] Site Check Please: IE 6 / CSS Zen Garden Project Hello, I was given the CSS Zen Garden project as a design test and I have something up on my server that I'm working on: http://e7flux.com/csszengarden

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please: IE 6 / CSS Zen Garden Project

2008-04-15 Thread Elli Vizcaino
. www.theatreorgans.co.uk www.virtualtheatreorgans.com Admin: ConnArtistes, UKShopsmiths, 2nd Touch A-P groups Shopsmith 520 + bits Flatulus Antiquitus - Original Message - From: Elli Vizcaino To: CSS Discuss Sent: Monday, April 14, 2008 9:31 PM Subject: [css-d] Site Check Please: IE 6

Re: [css-d] Site Check Please: IE 6 / CSS Zen Garden Project

2008-04-15 Thread David Laakso
Elli Vizcaino wrote: http://e7flux.com/csszengarden/chaoticspring.html You have height:1%; on the below selector. You may (?) want to feed that only to IE/6, as compliant browsers might do better without it at +2 font-scaling. .p5 { height: 1%; }

[css-d] Site Check Please: IE 6 / CSS Zen Garden Project

2008-04-14 Thread Elli Vizcaino
Hello, I was given the CSS Zen Garden project as a design test and I have something up on my server that I'm working on: http://e7flux.com/csszengarden/chaoticspring.html I've checked across IE6, 7, 8, FF Windows Mac and Safari Mac. They all seem fine except in IE6. The last time I checked

[css-d] site check please

2008-03-20 Thread Peter Hyde-Smith
03/20/2008 Hello All: I'd appreciate someone(s) looking at www.bildasfriesslakepub.com in IE6 and IE7, specifically at the Join Our Mailing List box at the top of the right hand column and let me know if it renders correctly (as in FF). Avant bumps the GO button up a few px, IE8 drops the GO

Re: [css-d] site check please

2008-03-20 Thread David Laakso
Peter Hyde-Smith wrote: I'd appreciate someone(s) looking at www.bildasfriesslakepub.com in IE6 and IE7, specifically at the Join Our Mailing List box at the top...] TIA and Cheers, Peter Looks fine to me at text-size largest in IE/6 7, Peter. Aside: I'd hold the your current

Re: [css-d] site check please - case closed

2008-03-20 Thread Peter Hyde-Smith
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 8:48 AM Subject: Re: [css-d] site check please Peter Hyde-Smith wrote: I'd appreciate someone(s) looking at www.bildasfriesslakepub.com in IE6 and IE7, specifically at the Join Our Mailing List box at the top...] TIA and Cheers, Peter David wrote: Looks

[css-d] Site Check Please?

2008-03-19 Thread Carolyn Rosner
Greetings all, I'm wondering what's up with my page: http://test.nprb.org/new/index.htm Specifically, the three buttons in upper right corner. They are a Library item, in their own div that's set to float: right. The span text that shows up on hover is positioned correctly, but those three

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >