is it possible to select an element based on the presence or absence of a
descendant with some attribute?
/bpj
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ --
may 16 2014 11:53 BPJ b...@melroch.se:
is it possible to select an element based on the presence or absence of a
descendant with some attribute?
AFAIK it’s not possible to select a parent element based on its descendant, no.
Can you describe a specific example? Do you control the HTML
You can with X-Path in XML. No reason why it shouldn't be possible
eventually--as part of CSS. And many reasons why it should
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 5:06 AM, MiB digital.disc...@gmail.com wrote:
may 16 2014 11:53 BPJ b...@melroch.se:
is it possible to select an element based on the
CSS selectors level 4 introduces a :has() pseudo class, but it isn't out
there and even when it is it will (initially at least) only be supported in
the complete profile - meaning it will work via querySelectorAll and
friends, but not CSS itself.
If you only, need this in script, jQuery has had
may 16 2014 14:25 Brian Kardell bkard...@gmail.com:
If you only, need this in script, jQuery has had :has from the beginning
(it was a proposal from CSS3 a decade and a half ago), and if you need it
in CSS you might have a look at hitchjs which has it
I suppose that if you are already using
may 16 2014 13:59 Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh sandy.pittendr...@gmail.com:
X-Path in XML
Is this viable for browser solutions with HTML5? I’m not familiar with X-path
outside of Java, which I only use at the server.
__
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 9:47 AM, MiB digital.disc...@gmail.com wrote:
may 16 2014 14:25 Brian Kardell bkard...@gmail.com:
If you only, need this in script, jQuery has had :has from the beginning
(it was a proposal from CSS3 a decade and a half ago), and if you need it
in CSS you might have a
On May 16, 2014 9:47 AM, MiB digital.disc...@gmail.com wrote:
may 16 2014 14:25 Brian Kardell bkard...@gmail.com:
If you only, need this in script, jQuery has had :has from the beginning
(it was a proposal from CSS3 a decade and a half ago), and if you need
it
in CSS you might have a
