Re: [Bug-cssc] Test delta/errorcase.sh -> E30 .. E32

2011-05-22 Thread James Youngman
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 2:56 PM, James Youngman wrote: > On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Joerg Schilling >> Then I don't understand the purpose of you test as it seems to verify that >> there is no such automatic switch to binary mode. > > That is not what the test verifies, as I have repeatedly

Re: [Bug-cssc] Test delta/errorcase.sh -> E30 .. E32

2011-05-22 Thread James Youngman
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Joerg Schilling wrote: > James Youngman wrote: > > >> > I am sure that you know that the existence of --something in many GNU >> > tools did >> > already result in many non-portable scripts and there is no man page that >> > warns >> > of using --something. >> >

Re: [Bug-cssc] Test delta/errorcase.sh -> E30 .. E32

2011-05-21 Thread James Youngman
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Joerg Schilling wrote: > Well, the related code is only in the -i code path. The behavior thus seems to > be indented this way by Sun. > > ==>     I however could be convinced to permit admin -b -n Thanks. >> >        admin/r-option.sh. >> >        docommand t5 "

Re: [Bug-cssc] Test delta/errorcase.sh -> E30 .. E32

2011-05-21 Thread James Youngman
[CC += cssc-users] On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote: > James Youngman wrote: > >> > why do you expect that it makes sense that a file with >> > no new line at the end should be "delta"d wihout error? >> >> It's a property required of CSSC but not other implementations. >>