On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 08:58:05PM -0500, Kevin Cackler wrote:
> For those of you guys who are experiencing this issue: I noticed tonight,
> after this happened yet again, that one of my files was owned by UID 1012 on
> node3. The problem is that that uid does not exist on node3. That uid DOES
>
For those of you guys who are experiencing this issue: I noticed
tonight, after this happened yet again, that one of my files was owned
by UID 1012 on node3. The problem is that that uid does not exist on
node3. That uid DOES exist on node1, and was the affected user. So when
csync2 copied
It's a pain as I'm now forced to re-evaluate our whole solution to 3-way
sync because of this issue...
When a file "test.txt" is updated, the logs show:
[12:22:01] Connecting to host node1 (PLAIN) ...
[12:22:01] Updating /test.txt on node1 ...
[12:22:01] File /test.txt is different on peer
In my case all of my synced nodes had the bad ownership. After changing
the ownership back to the correct value on one node, csync correctly
fixed it on the rest of the nodes, no problem.
In my case, the file with the bad ownership was one that was created by
a web application. After
Hi,
I've recently setup a csync cluster between 3 nodes and although the
ring model works ok, it obviously fails when the middle server (node 2)
is offline. Therefore I've been trying to get a working config that is
something like this:
node1 => node2 + node3
node2 => node1 + node3
node3 =>
