Could your lock-timeout line be failing due to being within and action clause?
Can you try putting it outside of the action clause but within your specific group clause? R/ TJ On Jul 22, 2014 3:00 AM, <csync2-requ...@lists.linbit.com> wrote: > Send Csync2 mailing list submissions to > csync2@lists.linbit.com > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/csync2 > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > csync2-requ...@lists.linbit.com > > You can reach the person managing the list at > csync2-ow...@lists.linbit.com > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Csync2 digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: lock-timeout (Slava Bendersky) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 00:25:51 -0400 (EDT) > From: Slava Bendersky <volga...@networklab.ca> > Subject: Re: [Csync2] lock-timeout > To: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenb...@linbit.com> > Cc: csync2@lists.linbit.com > Message-ID: > <2102672691.349854.1406003151215.javamail.zim...@skillsearch.ca> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Hello Lars, > I created rpm from 2.0RC2 last available download and it complain about > this option as syntax error. > > Near line 17: syntax error > Near line 17: syntax error > > [root@ca01srv00 ~]# rpm -qa | grep csync2 > csync2-2.0-10.fc16.x86_64 > > action > { > #pattern /etc/apache/httpd.conf; > #pattern /etc/apache/sites-available/*; > #exec "/usr/sbin/apache2ctl graceful"; > #lock-timeout 60; ---> line 17 > logfile "/var/log/csync2/csync2_action.log"; > do-local; > } > > > Slava > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Lars Ellenberg" <lars.ellenb...@linbit.com> > To: csync2@lists.linbit.com > Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 11:49:10 AM > Subject: Re: [Csync2] lock-timeout > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 07:53:23PM -0400, Slava Bendersky wrote: > > Hello Everyone, > > Is possible provide patch for lock-timeout option ? > > I created rpm from 2.0R2, but I see that patch never being committed ? > > > I'm not sure where you are looking, > but the current csync2 git knows about, > and documents the "lock-timeout" configuration option. > > > Lars > > > http://git.linbit.com/gitweb.cgi?p=csync2.git;a=blob;f=cfgfile_scanner.l#l69 > > http://git.linbit.com/gitweb.cgi?p=csync2.git;a=blob;f=doc/csync2_paper.tex#l451 > > Oops, typo there, s/wor/for/ ;-) > > > -- > : Lars Ellenberg > : LINBIT | Your Way to High Availability > : DRBD/HA support and consulting http://www.linbit.com > > DRBD? and LINBIT? are registered trademarks of LINBIT, Austria. > _______________________________________________ > Csync2 mailing list > Csync2@lists.linbit.com > http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/csync2 > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: < > http://lists.linbit.com/pipermail/csync2/attachments/20140722/59038e76/attachment.html > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Csync2 mailing list > Csync2@lists.linbit.com > http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/csync2 > > > End of Csync2 Digest, Vol 95, Issue 10 > ************************************** >
_______________________________________________ Csync2 mailing list Csync2@lists.linbit.com http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/csync2
