On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 03:15:32PM +0300, bes wrote:
> csync2 created for other purposes (config sync in the cluster).
That is correct.
> With so
> many files csync2 should be slower than rsync dramatically.
That is incorrect. Csync2 is used for huge trees, (tens of millions of
files) as well.
csync2 created for other purposes (config sync in the cluster). With so
many files csync2 should be slower than rsync dramatically.
Looks like you need a distributed network file system: glusterfs, ceph,
etc...
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Charles Williams
wrote:
> I will be using lsyncd to
I will be using lsyncd to watch for the changes and this is a directory
structure with thousands of sub-directories and a few 100,000 files
(magento, wordpress etc...) and would like something a bit more
selective and faster than rsync.
On Mo, 2014-10-27 at 14:55 +0300, bes wrote:
> I do not thin
I do not think that csync2 be useful in this situation. Why not just use
rsync?
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Charles Williams
wrote:
> Sorry guys. got a bit turned around there. corrected data flow:
>
>
> C -> A -> B
>
> thanks,
> chuck
>
> On Mo, 2014-10-27 at 09:55 +0100, Charles Williams
Sorry guys. got a bit turned around there. corrected data flow:
C -> A -> B
thanks,
chuck
On Mo, 2014-10-27 at 09:55 +0100, Charles Williams wrote:
> hey all,
>
> I have a bit of a strange situation here. I have the following
> directories I need to sync.
>
> A /var/customers (R
