-Caveat Lector- ------- Forwarded message follows ------- Date sent: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 16:45:54 -0500 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Elizabeth Wehrman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: FEAR: US CO: OPED: Privacy Of Banking Records Drug War Casualty Send reply to: Elizabeth Wehrman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Organization: Forfeiture Endangers American Rights http://www.fear.org/ FEAR also offers an unmoderated discussion list and digests for all lists List update: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=FEAR-list-update URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v01.n1383.a02.html Newshawk: Sledhead - http://drugtesting.freeservers.com/ Pubdate: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 Source: Denver Rocky Mountain News (CO) Copyright: 2001 Denver Publishing Co. Contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Website: http://www.denver-rmn.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/371 Note: From the St. Petersburg Times (FL) PRIVACY OF BANKING RECORDS ANOTHER DRUG WAR CASUALTY Our government hates money. Now that might sound odd, since Congress is so very good at spending it, but the truth is, money is considered a drug-war enemy. The ease with which money moves without our government being able to track it has led to an elaborate set of rules designed to prevent narcotics smugglers from enjoying their illicit profits. But the consequence of these rules is that all of us who engage in financial transactions are now targets of government spying. Today, every bank customer is a suspect. If a financial institution has reason to believe a transaction is out of the ordinary for that person, it must submit a "suspicious activity report" to the Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. This is done without the customer's knowledge and it means banks are expected to know their customers' financial habits and revenue sources. ( For those who have been following these issues, this might sound like the "Know Your Customer" regulations that were defeated in 1999 when the government received over 300,000 negative public comments. While the regulations were withdrawn, the suspicious activity report program continues under the Bank Secrecy Act. ) Since 1997 the U.S. Postal Service Office has also been sending "suspicious activity reports" to the federal government. When customers of money orders and wire transfers seem to have more money than they should or if they seem to be avoiding the reporting requirements that kick in for money orders of $3,000 or more, a report must be filed. In a training video on how to identify a suspicious transaction, the postal service tells its employees, "It's better to report 10 legal transactions than to let one illegal transaction get by." The program is called "Under the Eagle's Eye." A name that says it all. But getting American banks and the postal service to rat out their mostly innocent customers was the easy part. It's getting the rest of the world to join in that's been the challenge. If you want a reason to join the black-helicopter set, read the reports put out by the Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering, the 29-nation financial task force that includes the U.S., Germany, Japan and the rest of the world's richest industrial nations. The task force has developed a set of 40 "recommendations" to combat international money laundering that read like the postal services' training video. Under the recommendations, all countries around the world are expected to force their banks to know their customers and their financial habits. Banks are also expected to submit "suspicious activity reports" on out-of-the-ordinary and large cash transactions, and keep the monitoring program secret from their customers. Sound familiar? According to Bradley Jansen of the Free Congress Foundation, the group that has been leading the battle against these incursions, "Countries are also supposed to set up foreign intelligence units that are not under the control of the government's financial regulators but under law enforcement, with the aim of setting up a global network of unaccountable financial police." In June, FATF issued its annual report of "blacklisted" countries -- those nations that have made insufficient progress in following FATF's recommendations. This year Russia and the Philippines made the list, as well as 13 other nations. Those that make the blacklist are subject to full-blown economic sanctions, something our government is loath to do, or advisories issued to our own banks to require detailed documentation before doing business there, an approach that relies on voluntary cooperation to limited effect. But for the past two Congresses, a bill has been introduced to give the secretary of the Treasury vast new unilateral powers to add teeth to FATF's blacklist. The International Counter-Money Laundering and Anticorruption Act would give the Treasury secretary the option of barring U.S. banks from doing business with nations that refuse to compromise the privacy of their bank customers. And now the legislation has renewed life, since the chairmanship of the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee has shifted from Republican Phil Gramm of Texas, an opponent of the measure, to Paul Sarbanes, Maryland Democrat, a supporter and co-sponsor. The U.S. is saying to other nations: Spy on your people, know how they get and use their money or you can forget about doing business with us. So much for our tradition of government restraint, where the actions of individuals are not subject to state scrutiny without probable cause. We might pride ourselves in being a beacon of liberty, but in reality the light we're shining is not to advance freedom but to invade privacy. Our anti-money-laundering efforts are just another way we have exported our drug war to the detriment of civil liberties around the world. ****************************************************** FEAR also offers an unmoderated discussion list and digests for all lists List unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe ****************************************************** ------- End of forwarded message ------- -- Best Wishes Conspiracy's now the favorite charge For putting drug suspects away. A person can do some serious time >From what somebody might say But conspiracy's played by two sets of rules, At least that's what I feel. Applied to the powerful it's always a theory, To the rest of us it's real. ~~DC Dave <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
