-Caveat Lector-

------- Forwarded Message Follows -------
Date sent:              Thu, 19 Aug 1999 14:13:31 -0700
To:                     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From:                   "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject:                U.S. Bombing of Sudan: One Year Later

Institute for Public Accuracy
915 National Press Building, Washington, D.C. 20045
(202) 347-0020 * http://www.accuracy.org * [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___________________________________________________

Friday, August 20, 1999

U.S. BOMBING OF SUDAN: ONE YEAR LATER

A year ago -- on August 20, 1998 -- the U.S. government launched

cruise
missiles at Sudan and Afghanistan, claiming retaliation for the
U.S.
embassy bombings in Tanzania and Kenya two weeks earlier. Key
assertions
by U.S. government officials -- that the al-Shifa pharmaceutical plant in
Sudan was producing chemical weapons and that it was linked to Osama bin
Laden -- turned out to be inaccurate. The owner of the plant, Salah Idris,
has brought suit against the U.S. government.

The following analysts are available for interviews:

JASON VEST, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.villagevoice.com
A Washington correspondent for the Village Voice, Vest has investigated
the al-Shifa bombing. He comments: “It’s difficult to say what is more
amazing: the apparently glaring failures in the intelligence operation
that led to the al-Shifa plant being fingered as a chemical weapons site;
the actual bombing of the factory; the Clinton administration’s
over-the-top pattern of obfuscation and contradictions in explaining its
rationale for the bombing; Congress’ less-than-zealous attitude about
holding the administration accountable for an unnecessarily destructive
act (lying about sex gets you an independent counsel, but bombing another
country with shoddy evidence and lying about it doesn’t?); the mainstream
media’s unwillingness to hammer on this issue; or the public’s lack of
interest.”

HUSSEIN IBISH, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.adc.org/news
Communications director for the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination
Committee, Ibish said: “The bombing of the al-Shifa factory was an act of
aggression of the most reckless and lawless variety. The information upon
which it was based has proven to be flimsy at best, if not outright
fabrications. No attempt was made to deal with the supposed problem
through diplomatic means. Property was destroyed and lives taken in a
crude ‘revenge attack’ aimed at innocent third parties… The timing of the
incident with regard to the president’s political fortunes is highly
suspect, coming just after his belated admission of an ‘inappropriate
relationship.’ It is truly one of the moral low points of recent American
foreign policy.”

MARTIN BUTCHER, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.basicint.org
Senior visiting fellow at the British American Security Information
Council, Butcher said: “The case of the U.S. bombing the al-Shifa plant
shows the perils of the U.S. launching strikes against alleged
proliferators. This is particularly of concern since
Presidential Decision
Directive 60, approved in November 1997, allows for the use of
nuclear
weapons against alleged proliferators.”

For more information, contact at the Institute for Public
Accuracy:
Sam Husseini, (202) 347-0020; David Zupan, (541) 484-9167



                                 FAIR-L
                    Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting
               Media analysis, critiques and news reports




August 17, 1999
Contact: Seth Ackerman (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])


WILL THE MEDIA REMEMBER AL-SHIFA?
Embassy Bombings Commemorated Without Mention of Factory Attack


This month marks the anniversary of the August 7, 1998 terrorist
attacks on American embassies in Tanzania and Kenya, which
claimed the lives of 224 people, including 12 Americans. The
anniversary has received substantial media attention, including
stories on NBC's Sunday Today (8/8/99), ABC's World News
Saturday (8/7/99), CBS's Evening News (8/7/99),
and the Washington Post (8/8/99), the New York Times (8/7/99),
and Los Angeles Times (8/7/99).

But virtually absent from this coverage has been any mention of
the U.S. response which followed those attacks: the cruise
missile raids launched two weeks later by President Clinton
against camps in Afghanistan and against the Al-Shifa
pharmaceutical plant in Khartoum, Sudan.

Although U.S. officials originally claimed the Sudanese factory
was involved in the production of chemical weapons and had links
to accused terrorist Osama bin Laden, those assertions-along
with many of the subsequent, shifting allegations offered in the
days following the attack-have turned out to be inaccurate.

To date, the U.S. has presented no convincing evidence directly
linking the factory to either bin Laden or chemical weapons. But
it should be noted that even if the U.S. could offer credible
evidence that the Al-Shifa plant made chemical weapons, or that
it was linked to bin Laden, the missile strike would almost
certainly still be a violation of the United Nations charter and
a serious contravention of international law. The Charter
permits countries to use force only in "self-defense" against
an "armed attack"-an attack which, according to the accepted
legal standard, must be so imminent as to leave "no choice of
means, and no moment of deliberation."

August 20 will mark the anniversary of the Al-Shifa attack. With
the notable exceptions of the Washington Post and U.S. News &
World Report, which recently ran informative articles about the
Al-Shifa case (Washington Post, 7/25/99; U.S. News &World
Report, 8/16-23/99), the mainstream media have paid little
attention to the Al Shifa case.

FAIR encourages journalists to use the anniversary of the cruise
missile attacks as an opportunity to review the evidence upon
which the Sudan attack was based, and the legality of the
attacks on both Sudan and Afghanistan. Media outlets should look
back in their reporting not only on crimes committed against the
U.S., but also on possible crimes committed by the U.S.

***
For more information on the media's response to the Al-Shifa
attacks, please read "Media in Cruise Control" at:
http://www.fair.org/articles/cruise-control.html

A<>E<>R
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking
new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said
it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your
own reason and your common sense." --Buddha
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
A merely fallen enemy may rise again, but the reconciled
one is truly vanquished. -Johann Christoph Schiller,
                                       German Writer (1759-1805)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
It is preoccupation with possessions, more than anything else, that
prevents us from living freely and nobly. -Bertrand Russell
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Everyone has the right...to seek, receive and impart
information and ideas through any media and regardless
of frontiers."
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will
teach you to keep your mouth shut."
--- Ernest Hemingway
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to