WJPBR Email News List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Peace at any cost is a Prelude to War! Dear Brigade, "What the Mexican president plans to do with our country is largely what he promised to work for during his presidential campaign -- essentially, the abolition of the borders between the United States and Mexico, the abolition of virtually all immigration controls and a massive economic facelift for Mexico at the expense of American taxpayers....." GO PAT GO!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Linda BUCHANAN-FOSTER 2000! ----------- From: "beneye" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Linda Muller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Mexican's plan would abolish U.S. border and sovereignty Date sent: Sun, 20 Aug 2000 21:11:44 -0400 Of all the Presidential candidates, only Buchanan has addressed this issue and vowed to protect our soverignty and borders. ------------- SAMUEL FRANCIS Mexican's plan would abolish U.S. border and sovereignty August 19, 2000 With Republicans chattering in Spanish and Democrats considering a massive amnesty for illegal aliens, it's unlikely the next administration will be very interested in controlling the nation's borders. Yet, if the new president of Mexico has his way, there won't be much of a border to control. This week Mexico's new maximum leader Vicente Fox unbosomed his plans for the United States in an interview with the Washington Post. What the Mexican president plans to do with our country is largely what he promised to work for during his presidential campaign -- essentially, the abolition of the borders between the United States and Mexico, the abolition of virtually all immigration controls and a massive economic facelift for Mexico at the expense of American taxpayers. Mr. Fox, as the Post reports, "proposed creating a European Union-style partnership in North America, in which the United States and Canada would help create jobs and raise income levels in Mexico." The European Union, of course, is the transnational order that is effectively abolishing distinct national sovereignties and cultures in Europe and, as with Austria, threatening to bludgeon any member nation that even whispers resistance. That kind of "union" might be swell for a national basket-case like Mexico, which is governed by gangsters and immersed in poverty, illiteracy and backwardness, and that's why Mr. Fox wants it. "His top priority," the Post reports, "would be to reduce the gigantic economic gap between the United States and Mexico." He plans to do so by having the United States and Canada finance a "development fund through the North American Free Trade Agreement [NAFTA] similar to the $35 billion-a-year European Union development fund." Guess who gets to pay for that? It won't be Mexico, but Mexico would be the partner to gain from it. Mr. Fox also has good deal of lip about any measures the United States takes to keep illegal Mexicans out of the country. "By building up walls, by putting up arms, by dedicating billions of dollars like every [U.S.] border state is doing to avoid migration is not the way to go," he whines. Well, in the first place, the immigration problem grew because U.S. authorities really didn't enforce border security very well and because Mexican authorities didn't enforce it at all. Mexico has every good reason not to control the flood of its own people beyond its own borders. Since its economy can do nothing with or for them and since their continued presence represents only a political threat to its ruling class, Mexico encourages them to leave. In the second place, Mr. Fox is largely right that the ultimate reason for Mexican emigration is the difference in the living standards between the two countries. He's also right that modernizing Mexico would help reduce the difference. But modernization is easier said than done. NAFTA was supposed to accomplish that, as well as reduce immigration. In fact, it's done neither. Until modernization really comes, controlling the immigration flood Mexico refuses to control is the only way we can keep all of Mexico from arriving here. Mr. Fox likes to talk up "friendship" between his country and ours, but most of what he has to say manages to put the blame on us. "We must be better friends, we must be better neighbors, we must be better partners," he insisted to the Post, but apparently it's all our fault that Mexicans don't make more money and that we don't welcome every Mexican who wants to sneak across the border. "He said he did not understand why Mexicans should be so unwelcome in a country that was built by immigrants." Mr. Fox's plan for "friendship" is a close cousin to the kind of transnationalism that has flourished (or tried to) since the end of the Cold War. First it was the United Nations that was supposed to build and enforce the "New World Order," and when that began to flop, it was NAFTA, the World Trade Organization, NATO or the European Union. When these schemes are not merely thinly masked forms of imperialism by which major states can bully minor ones, they're devices by which the corporate and political elites of collapsing states like Mexico can bail themselves out by getting their brother elites in developed countries to send them more buckets. The United States ought to want Mexico to develop its economy and keep its population at home, but there's no reason Americans should have to pay for that to happen and no reason we should have to take in Mexico's uninvited millions until it does. Whoever the next American president turns out to be, he needs to make sure the border is protected and to tell Mr. Fox and his fellow Mexicans to stay on their side of it. http://forum.samfrancis.net -------- end -------- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ T H E I N T E R N E T B R I G A D E Linda Muller - WebMaster Post Office Box 650266, Potomac Falls, Virginia 20165 Email: http://www.buchanan.org/form-contact.html Web: http://www.buchanan.org *COPYRIGHT NOTICE** In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107, any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for nonprofit research and educational purposes only.[Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml ] Want to be on our lists? Write at [EMAIL PROTECTED] for a menu of our lists! ****************************************************************************** ******************* A vote for Bush or Gore is a vote to continue Clinton policies! A vote for Buchanan is a vote to continue America! Therefore a vote for Gore or Bush is a wasted vote for America! Don't waste your vote! Vote for Patrick Buchanan! Today, candor compels us to admit that our vaunted two-party system is a snare and a delusion, a fraud upon the nation. Our two parties have become nothing but two wings of the same bird of prey... Patrick Buchanan <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
