[CTRL] FC: Nuremberg Files protected by 1st Amend. (fwd)

2001-03-29 Thread Yardbird
-Caveat Lector- The web site in question (the lawsuit was broader, but the site was part of the case): http://www.ru486registry.com/atrocity/ Background: http://www.politechbot.com/cgi-bin/politech.cgi?name=nuremberg AP coverage:

Re: [CTRL] ``The Nuremberg Files''

1999-02-03 Thread YnrChyldzWyld
-Caveat Lector- On Tue, 2 Feb 1999, Howard R. Davis III wrote: Again, in the concept of "Free Speech" resides, implicitly, "responsibility". Where did you get this? Responsibility? Who is to judge what is responsible free speech? Please define that so we can judge whether or not you fulfill

[CTRL] ``The Nuremberg Files''

1999-02-02 Thread Alamaine Ratliff
-Caveat Lector- Again, in the concept of "Free Speech" resides, implicitly, "responsibility". The interesting thing about the title of the subject web site is that it identifies one group of people for whom a bounty has been posted. As the article states, "" They maintained that they were

Re: [CTRL] ``The Nuremberg Files''

1999-02-02 Thread Franklin Wayne Poley
-Caveat Lector- On Tue, 2 Feb 1999, Alamaine Ratliff wrote: -Caveat Lector- Again, in the concept of "Free Speech" resides, implicitly, "responsibility". The interesting thing about the title of the subject web site is that it identifies one group of people for whom a bounty has been

Re: [CTRL] ``The Nuremberg Files''

1999-02-02 Thread Howard R. Davis III
-Caveat Lector- Alamaine Ratliff wrote: -Caveat Lector- Again, in the concept of "Free Speech" resides, implicitly, "responsibility". Where did you get this? Responsibility? Who is to judge what is responsible free speech? Please define that so we can judge whether or not you fulfill