-Caveat Lector-
>From http://www.consortiumnews.com/archive/bullet1.html
}}}>Begin
'Silver Bullet' (Part 1): Bill Clinton's 'Treason'
By Robert Parry
September 1992 was a grim time for the Republican Party. George Bush's re-
election, which only a year earlier seemed assured by his Persian Gulf victory, was in
grave danger. Over the summer, Bill Clinton and his bus tours had built a double-digit
lead. President Bush was struggling to explain why he wanted a second term.
As the election clock ticked down, Bush's operatives saw little hope unless they could
find a "silver bullet," a Clinton scandal so vile that it would take out the Comeback
Kid
once and for all. In mid-September, that possibility arose with rumors of a nearly
treasonous act by Clinton, that as a young anti-Vietnam War activist and Rhodes
scholar, the Democratic nominee had tried to renounce his American citizenship.
Senior Republicans seemed untroubled by the fact that there was no evidence to
support this ugly smear.
This "renunciation" story began to take shape on July 30, 1992, when Michael
Hedges, a reporter for the right-wing Washington Times, submitted a Freedom of
Information Act request to the FBI. The FOIA sought FBI records on Clinton's anti-
war activities in the 1960s and 1970s. The FOIA fit with the vague rumors that had
circulated for months that Clinton had tried to gain citizenship from another country
to
avoid the draft.
In early September 1992, Hedges approached his friend, David Tell, to request help
from the Bush administration for an expedited search of Clinton's files. Tell, a young
Republican activist, was director of Opposition Research at the Bush re-election
campaign. In that position, Tell headed the division that dug up dirt on opponents, a
dark art known in political circles as "oppo." Already, Tell had investigated a number
of rumors about Clinton and even probed the work record of Clinton's mother when
she was a nurse in Louisiana.
On Sept. 16, 1992, Tell typed a memo about Hedges's FOIA request and took it to
Bush's campaign manager Fred Malek. With Malek's blessing, Tell sent the memo to
Robert Teeter, chairman of the Bush re-election campaign. Teeter, in turn, passed
on the gist of Tell's memo to the so-called "core group" of top White House officials
and campaign insiders who jointly were coordinating President Bush's re-election
strategy.
The political potential of the renunciation rumor didn't escape James Baker, then-
White House chief of staff. Baker, a smooth-talking Texas lawyer and a Bush
confidante, knew the story would revive doubts about Clinton's fitness for office.
Baker's Dubious Legacy
Though highly regarded in Washington for his political acumen, Baker had left
footprints through some of the nastier electoral games of the era. He was a chief
suspect in the theft of President Carter's debate briefing book in 1980. Baker had run
the mean-spirited Bush campaign in 1988, when false rumors were spread about
Michael Dukakis's mental health and the Willie Horton race card was played. Baker
personified the winning-is-everything school of politics.
So, after the "core group" meeting on Sept. 16, 1992, Baker discussed the
Washington Times's FOIA request with his top aides, Janet Mullins and Margaret
Tutwiler. Baker then personally took the issue to White House legal counsel C.
Boyden Gray, another Bush loyalist. Gray recalled that Baker wanted to know if the
White House could speed up the FBI response to the FOIA on "this alleged
renunciation or proposed renunciation of citizenship."
The excitement over this possible "silver bullet" was energizing others, too, in the
senior echelon of the Bush administration. Gray contacted Timothy Flanigan,
assistant attorney general for the Office of Legal Counsel at the Justice Department.
The two officials hashed over the possibilities.
Flanigan advised Gray that the FBI likely would rebuff any pressure to speed up the
FOIA request -- and that release of such personal material would violate the Privacy
Act. Gray then mused that perhaps someone could examine Clinton's passport files
on national security grounds. That would be hard, Flanigan explained, because
Clinton already had national security clearances.
On Sept. 25, 1992, little more than a month before the Nov. 3 election, Baker was
back on the phone to one of Gray's deputies, John Schmitz. Baker was pressing for
an answer on the FOIA question. At 6:08 that evening, according to Baker's notes,
Gray called Baker back. Gray passed on the bad news that expedited handling of the
FOIA wouldn't fly. Baker then gave Gray more details about the suspicion that
Clinton had written a letter while at Oxford asking how he could renounce his country
and become a British citizen.
"Holy Cow, maybe I'd better take another look at it," Gray responded, according to
Baker's memo to the file. In the same memo, Baker wrote to himself that he was
asking Gray to do nothing that was not "completely legal." For his part, Gray said he
recalled using a word other than "cow."
While Gray re-examined the prospects of pushing the FBI, Baker turned his attention
to similar FOIAs submitted by journalists at the State Department. Baker instructed
his aide, Janet Mullins, to ask Steven Berry, assistant secretary of state for
legislative
affairs, about progress on those inquiries. Mullins talked to Berry before Sept. 30,
according to their recollections.
Then, on Sept. 30, amid the frenzied search for the "silver bullet," Elizabeth Tamposi,
another assistant secretary of state, sent three of her subordinates to the federal
records center in Suitland, Maryland, to search Clinton's passport files. In a later
press interview, Tamposi would assert that she ordered the search after Berry had
pressured her to "dig up dirt on Clinton" for the Bush White House.
The 'Staple Hole' Mystery
The search, however, found no letter renouncing citizenship. All the State
Department officials discovered was a passport application with staple holes and a
slight tear in the corner. Though the tear was easily explained by the routine practice
of stapling a photo, money order or routing slip to the application, the Bush
administration sleuths were not easily discouraged.
Tamposi seized on the ripped page to justify a new suspicion, that a Clinton ally at
the State Department had removed the renunciation letter. Tamposi shaped that
bizarre possibility into a criminal referral which was forwarded to the Justice
Department. Thin as the case might be, the Bush re-election effort now had its
official action that meant they could elevate the renunciation rumor into a public
issue.
Within hours of the criminal referral, someone from the Bush camp leaked word
about the confidential FBI investigation to reporters at Newsweek magazine. The
Newsweek reporters involved, especially Margaret Warner, had very close ties to
Baker's inner circle, dating back to Baker's years as secretary of state.
The Newsweek story about the tampering investigation hit the newsstands on Oct. 4,
1992. The article suggested that a Clinton backer might have removed incriminating
material from Clinton's passport file, precisely the spin that the Bush people wanted.
Immediately, Bush took the offensive, using the frenzy over the tampering story to
attack Clinton's patriotism on a variety of fronts, including his student trip to
Moscow
in 1970.
With his patriotism challenged, Clinton saw his once-formidable lead shrink. Quickly,
a panicked Clinton campaign sought help from a seasoned political hand, R.
Spencer Oliver, who was then chief counsel on the House Foreign Affairs
Committee. (Oliver was a veteran of GOP electoral shenanigans. In 1972, his phone
at Democratic national headquarters was one of those bugged by Richard Nixon's
Watergate burglars.)
Oliver dispatched his own team to the State Department to examine what was behind
the mysterious passport criminal referral. When Oliver learned that the evidence
consisted only of staple holes, he blew the whistle on what looked like another GOP
dirty trick. Within days, the FBI, too, rejected the tampering suspicion. The passport
gambit backfired on the Bush campaign.
Though little noted by political reporters who covered the 1992 campaign, the
outcome of the passport case was a key factor in ending the 12-year Reagan-Bush
reign. The fiasco hobbled Bush during his planned sprint to the election finish line
and blocked the Bush campaign's hopes to exploit another conveniently timed
criminal referral -- over Clinton's Whitewater real estate investment. Clinton hung on
to win the election.
After Bush's defeat, Baker grew depressed, blaming himself for the passport disaster
and the re-election loss. On Nov. 20, 1992, at 10:30 a.m., a despondent Baker
visited Bush. "Jim Baker came in here ... deeply disturbed and read to me a long
letter of resignation all because of this stupid passport situation," Bush wrote in his
diary. But Bush rejected Baker's offer to resign.
At the urging of the State Department's inspector general, the passport case also
prompted the appointment of a special prosecutor. But the conservative-dominated
three- judge panel that picks special prosecutors named a trusted Republican,
Joseph diGenova, to head the probe.
Also luckily for the Bush legacy, diGenova was hiring staff in early 1993 just as the
House October Surprise task force was disbanding. Despite strong evidence to the
contrary, that task force had cleared William Casey, George Bush and other
Republicans of long-standing allegations that they had interfered with President
Carter's negotiations to free 52 American hostages in Iran.
As reported in the first eight issues of The Consortium, the task force reached its
conclusion by constructing bogus alibis for Casey, applying irrational arguments and
hiding evidence pointing to Republican guilt. DiGenova snapped up six veterans of
the October Surprise staff, including deputy independent counsel Michael Zeldin,
who had served in the Reagan-Bush Justice Department, and associate independent
counsel David Laufman, who had worked for the CIA.
DiGenova's team went to work explaining away the obviously criminal acts involved
in the passport case. Though Clinton's privacy rights had been violated and the
leaking of a confidential criminal referral was a felony, diGenova said he could not
figure out who had committed the misdeeds. So he constructed elaborate rationales
to clear all the Republicans of any wrongdoing.
Indeed, the government official who came under diGenova's sharpest criticism was
the State Department's Inspector General Sherman Funk -- for demanding the
investigation in the first place. The diGenova team castigated Funk for "a woefully
inadequate understanding of the facts and a blithely naive view of the job
responsibilities at the State Department."
Later, one senior Clinton administration official reviewed the whitewashing of the
October Surprise issue and similar handling of the passport case. The official shook
his head in disgust. "They're the cleaners," he said about the investigative team, a
reference to ruthless intelligence experts who are brought onto the scene of a
botched operation to clean up the incriminating evidence.
End<{{{
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Forwarded as information only; no automatic endorsement
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe
simply because it has been handed down for many generations. Do not
believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do
not believe in anything simply because it is written in Holy Scriptures. Do not
believe in anything merely on the authority of Teachers, elders or wise men.
Believe only after careful observation and analysis, when you find that it
agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all.
Then accept it and live up to it."
The Buddha on Belief, from the Kalama Sutta
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will
teach you to keep your mouth shut."
--- Ernest Hemingway
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
