-Caveat Lector-
Thank you, Robert!
On Wed, 9 Jun 1999, Robert Tatman wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
> William Hugh Tunstall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -Caveat Lector-
> >
> > The free trade vs. protectionism debate is something of a joke.
> >
> > I once spent a desultory afternoon searching
-Caveat Lector-
William Hugh Tunstall wrote:
The free trade vs. protectionism debate is something of a joke.
MJ:
Yes, especially when ONLY the latter exists in the reality
of today.
Regard$,
--MJ
Underlying most arguments against the free market is a lack of
belief in freedom itself. --
-Caveat Lector-
William Hugh Tunstall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
> The free trade vs. protectionism debate is something of a joke.
>
> I once spent a desultory afternoon searching through the stacks of the
> local university for information on Frederich List, a nineteenth ce
-Caveat Lector-
The free trade vs. protectionism debate is something of a joke.
I once spent a desultory afternoon searching through the stacks of the
local university for information on Frederich List, a nineteenth century
German economist who championed the American system of tariffs (defende
-Caveat Lector-
COST OF PROTECTIONISM
Ironically, political pressure for trade protection has grown
during the current economic expansion. Similarly, the infamous
Smoot-Hawley Tariff was enacted at a time of unprecedented
prosperity. It may be that economists have not done a very good
job of
