-Caveat Lector-

http://www.washtimes.com/news/news3.html#link
>>
    Clinton woos environmentalists,
    plans to ban use of public land

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
    By Audrey Hudson
    THE WASHINGTON TIMES
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
    he Clinton administration is planning to ban most public use of 5
million acres of federal land in six states to placate environmental voters
before the 2000 presidential election.
    Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt is using his regulatory authority to
halt mining, grazing, logging and oil and gas exploration on public lands.
    In many cases all recreational uses would be banned except walking and
meditating.
    'We have to be wary. They want to appease the extreme environmentalists
who have this on their agenda and want this to happen,' said Sen. Frank H.
Murkowski, Alaska Republican and chairman of the Energy and Natural
Resources Committee. 'In the next

    -- Continued from Front Page --
    19 months we will see a significant movement to usurp congressional
authority.'
    Mr. Babbitt also says he may ask President Clinton to use the
Antiquities Act to declare some of the public land a national monument.
Among other things, the act authorizes the president to set aside land for
preservation.
    Mr. Clinton received kudos from the environmental community when he used
that act during the 1996 presidential campaign. He created the 1.7
million-acre Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument in Utah to stop
mining, and oil and gas exploration.
    In four of the Western states, the administration is hoping to declare
or designate:
    2.6 million acres in Utah a wilderness study area.
    1.5 million acres in Alaska a wilderness area.
    505,350 acres in Arizona a national monument.
    Several miles along the Upper Missouri River in Montana as a national
park, conservation area or wildlife refuge.

    In a written statement, Mr. Babbitt's spokesman said Republicans should
be helping them by drafting legislation to 'protect' these areas from 'big
mining companies, the big oil companies and the big developers who want to
chop up what's left of their unspoiled American public lands.'
    The administration has also proposed a two-year moratorium from mineral
activity on 429,000 acres in Montana; 165,000 acres in Colorado and 5,000
acres in Missouri.
    Republican lawmakers say that by removing these lands from future
exploration, the administration is hurting local communities by eliminating
jobs and tax revenues. It also leaves the United States more dependent on
foreign oil.
    'There is no question they are trying to stick it to us, and it's really
sad. These are pioneer families who made the West, and they feel robbed,'
said Sen. Orrin G. Hatch, Utah Republican.
    'Their goal is to turn public lands into a museum -- a diorama where all
of the people are on the outside looking in,' said Laura Skaer, executive
director of the Northwest Mining Association.
    'I think they have quietly declared a new war on the West,' she said. 'I
expect Clinton will find all sorts of national monuments to start popping up
between now and November 2000.'
    Republican Missouri lawmakers have written to Mr. Babbitt saying the
withdrawals were 'unnecessary and inappropriate.'
    'It appears the administration has launched an orchestrated campaign to
preclude mining on vast acreages of public lands governed by multiple-use
laws and to do so without consulting Congress and without soliciting public
input or independent scientific review,' Sens. John Ashcroft, Christopher S.
Bond, and Rep. Jo Ann Emerson, stated in the letter.
    Mrs. Emerson fears many jobs would be lost in her district as a result
of the administration's actions and says the land would be useless 'unless
people just want to stand there and meditate.'
    Sen. Conrad Burns, Montana Republican, said he is concerned with the
lack of discussion or local input from those who will be directly affected.
    'There is no doubt they have chosen to make an assault on the West. We
may as well be operating under a czar,' Mr. Burns said.
    Mr. Murkowski is also concerned that the proposed designations are a
blueprint for Mr. Clinton to bolster his environmental record before leaving
office. In a letter to his Senate colleagues, he pointed to a May 22
National Journal article in which Mr. Babbitt is quoted as saying: 'We've
switched the rules of the game. We're not trying to do anything
legislatively.'
    GOP lawmakers are hoping to close loopholes through proposed
legislation. Sens. Robert F. Bennett of Utah and Larry E. Craig of Idaho are
pushing bills to amend the Antiquities Act to include public comment.
    The National Monument Public Participation Act of 1999 would ensure the
public and Congress have the right to participate in decisions to declare
national monuments on federal land. It would require full public
participation, environmental compliance and congressional ratification.
    Before making a recommendation to the president, the secretary of
Interior would also have to determine the value of the mineral and surface
natural resources.
    Mr. Craig initially proposed legislation in 1996 prohibiting the
president from declaring national monuments in Idaho. His measure failed,
but he was recently approached by other Senators to craft new legislation to
provide protection to all states.
    'Our general concern and frustration is what the administration did in
Southern Utah they could do everywhere else in the country, and that they
were unwilling to work with Congress -- especially as we head into a
presidential cycle,' Mr. Craig said.
    'This has become a political tool and not a means to protect unique
environmental assets,' he said.<<

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to