-Caveat Lector-

* Deception, forgery in 'leaked' WTC plans*
<
http://www.total411.info/2007/07/deception-forgery-in-leaked-wtc-plans.html>
[http://algoxy.com/psych/whatis9-11Disinfo_fakeplan.html]
<http://www.total411.info/A-A-78.jpg> Construction expert Christopher A.
Brown has evaluated the World Trade Center "blueprints" leaked by the
founder of STJ911 disinformation
cell<http://loosechange911.blogspot.com/2007/03/wtc-blueprints-released.html>,
Steven E. Jones.

**Brown's analysis
follows<http://algoxy.com/psych/whatis9-11Disinfo_fakeplan.html>:


"Unfortunately the WTC plans released appear to be fraudulently presented as
"Construction Drawings" or "Architectural plans" actually used for
construction of WTC 1.

[...]

The following is an analyses of random samples of the revisions table from
the graphics files of the above [Jones-leaked] WTC 1 plans "4.)PAC1 TOWER
A". The analysis of graphic appearances and text from the "4.)PAC1 TOWER A"
subdirectory above.

Most of the dimensions are not legible at any zoom level on any of the
scans. The title block shows 1967 on most sets, some are not legible.

Below is a portion of the title block of A-A-13.TIFF



PROBLEMS WITH AUTHENTICITY OF THE ABOVE.

Note the lack of clouding (dots and trash) in the background of the actual
dated "REVISIONS" table. An area usually really smudged creating major
clouding in a scanned plan. NOTE the clean, sharp edged cutoff of the dot
cloud to the right of the word "REVISIONS". Something VERY typical of
photoshopping documents.

NONE OF THE SHEETS ARE ACCEPTED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL OF THE PLANNING
DIVISION. You can count on every sheet being signed with approval on a job
for a building with this prominence.

These are not construction drawings. If they were from LERA they would be
from scanned from vellums and these are from beat up blue lines judging by
the clouding trash on them. Some of the digital files were created on
10/15/02 at 4:44 AM

Below is a portion of the title block revisions table of A-A-99.TIFF Notice
the anomaly in the initial columns of the left side table, 3rd cell from the
bottom.



[At right] is a zoom of that cell. Not much to be said about it except it
definitely does not belong there and it is some sort of digital, graphic
artifact. Not a hand lettered initial. far too straight for too many pixels

A portion of the title block revisions table of
A-A-139.TIFF<http://algoxy.com/psych/planimages/wtc1rev.tabAA-139.jpg>[and]
title block revisions of the table on
A-A-140.TIFF also has the same anomaly with its characteristics.

Sheet A-A-141.TIFF has the same anomaly but twice. ..

Comparison of the initials of the revisions tables of 99 and 139 show the
same initials circled in blue are suspicious and could be the same numbers
copied and pasted perhaps after being separated from their accompanying
triangular detail numbers and being altered by scaling. blurring or
distorting. The date appears as the same quite often in the "REVISIONS"
tables.

CONCLUSION

The plans are actually 1964 plans that have had their date altered to appear
as 1967 or during construction. Since there is no approval by the chief of
the planning division it is certain the plans are not actual construction
drawings.

Clearly the anomaly in the revisions table should not be there and the table
is free of most clouding where there should be more than usual. Slice lines
of graphic manipulations appear in A-A-13.TIFF.

It seem very likely that a revisions table was scanned and dissected then
reassembled into a graphic which matched the title block of the WTC 1
preliminary set then pasted in. The entire file could then had been rescaled
or saved at another resolution to hide the splices.

The .dxf files are useless and mostly nonsense. One file "wtc1_2000.dxf" is
a product of the "LZA Technology A Division of The Thornton Tomasetti Group"
and appears to be the beginning of an effort to analyze the plane impacts as
the impact area of flight 11 is shown.

Since the WTC2 plans are missing it is clear that is because the WTC2 plans
only show the concrete core and cannot be used to deceive the public as to
the actual construction of the towers by representing them as having 47
steel core columns. The concrete core of the towers is documented with
images from 9-11 here <http://algoxy.com/conc/core.html>.

-----

Go to source link for images from tiff files 139, 140 and 141

--

--
www.total411.info
www.total911.info

www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/
<A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to