-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 1/26/99 9:44:38 AM Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >
> > In a message dated 1/25/99 12:03:57 PM Mountain Standard Time,
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >
> > >
> > > > The enviros
> > >
> > > A blanket term used to discredit
-Caveat Lector-
>
> In a message dated 1/25/99 12:03:57 PM Mountain Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> >
> > > The enviros
> >
> > A blanket term used to discredit. What are you up to here?
> >
> One would assume from your post that your only hang up with
> logging 8000
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 1/25/99 12:03:57 PM Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > The enviros
>
> A blanket term used to discredit. What are you up to here?
>
One would assume from your post that your only hang up with
logging 8000 trees is the fact that I refer
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 1/25/99 1:14:57 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> The enviros
A blanket term used to discredit. What are you up to here?
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
-Caveat Lector-
Ain't it *rich* so to speak. The enviros don't have a problem in the world
with removing 8000 trees from Grand Canyon Park but they are concerned
about the "means" Apparently it was suggested using horses instead of
trucks to haul the cut down trees.
Sec of Interior Babbitt