-Caveat Lector-

http://www.nytimes.com/2002/05/09/national/09BURE.html

F.B.I. Says Pre-Sept. 11 Note Got Little Notice
By DAVID JOHNSTON

WASHINGTON, May 8 - Robert S. Mueller III, the director of the Federal
Bureau of Investigation, acknowledged today at a Senate hearing that his
agency had paid too little attention to a July 2001 memorandum written by an
F.B.I. agent in Phoenix who detected a disturbing pattern of Middle Eastern
men attending American flight training schools

"Should we have done more in terms of the Phoenix E.C.?" Mr. Mueller said of
the memorandum, referring to it as an electronic communication. "Yes."

Several Democratic senators at the Judiciary Committee hearing criticized
what they said was the bureau's tepid response to the memorandum's
conclusions, suggesting that the F.B.I.may have missed a chance, two months
before the attacks, to investigate Arab men at American flight schools.

Only one paragraph of the classified memorandum has been made public. But
government officials have said the bureau agent concluded in the document
that a number of Arab men with possible ties to terrorism had attended
flight schools. He urged the bureau to conduct a nationwide review.

Today, Mr. Mueller defended the agency's handling of the memorandum. He said
that the memorandum mentioned several people by name but that none were
found to have had any ties to the 19 hijackers. One or more may still be
under investigation, and some could have ties to terrorist groups.

"He made a recommendation that we initiate a program to look at flight
schools," Mr. Mueller said of the agent. "That was received at headquarters.
It was not acted on by Sept. 11th. I should say in passing that even if we
had followed those suggestions at that time, it would not, given what we
know since Sept. 11, have enabled us to prevent the attacks of Sept. 11."

Mr. Mueller said the recommendation to investigate Middle Eastern men in
flight schools was regarded at the time as "a monumental undertaking without
any specificity as to particular persons, the individuals who were being
investigated."

But some senators seemed unwilling to accept Mr. Mueller's assurances and
the prickly exchanges between Mr. Mueller and Democratic senators indicated
how sentiment in Congress had swung sharply away from the prevailing mood
after the attacks. Back then, lawmakers seemed unwilling to criticize
agencies, like the bureau and the Central Intelligence Agency, which were
trying to thwart fresh attacks.

Under questioning, Mr. Mueller said he doubted that the memorandum was
reviewed at a senior level by agency directors. He said he did not believe
that the memorandum had been sent to the joint C.I.A.-F.B.I.
counterterrorism center. Mr. Mueller added that he did not believe that the
agents who investigated Zacarias Moussaoui, whom the government says was
intended to be the 20th hijacker, in August had been told of the Phoenix
memorandum.

Senator Dianne Feinstein, Democrat of California, said the memorandum was
"much more consequential than many of them that I read on almost a daily
basis now, much fuller, much more descriptive." Ms. Feinstein added, "It was
something that perhaps should have gone right to the director of the F.B.I.,
and perhaps he should have even sent it to the president."

John Edwards, Democrat of North Carolina, said, "The American people are
entitled to know why red flags were ignored, and I think the F.B.I. has a
lot of explaining to do."

Richard J. Durbin, Democrat of Illinois, said, "I believe the Phoenix memo
is going to come to be one of the most important documents in our national
debate about whether we did enough to protect America from the attack of
Sept. 11th."

Bush administration officials have said they had no evidence that any agency
had warning of the attacks, but today's hearing indicated that Democrats
were willing to challenge those assertions.

The questions are surfacing as Congress prepares for joint hearings on the
performance of counterterrorism agencies in the months before to the
hijackings. Investigators are examining the files and have conducted
meetings with the F.B.I.

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to