-Caveat Lector-
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001 20:16:35 -0600 kl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
-Caveat Lector-
How does Carl's least corrupt/offensive/restrictive government differ
from Libertarianism?
Probably not much. Depends on the details. I was just tossing out my
core belief.
Creeds must disagree:
-Caveat Lector-
Original Message Follows
From: [redacted]
To: [redacted]
Subject: [RRE]restoring the Confederacy
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001
[The movement to restore the Confederacy is really picking up steam.
John Ashcroft's alliance with a wide range of far-right groups is but
the tip of
-Caveat Lector-
On 12 Jan 2001, at 15:16, Nessie wrote:
Of course states have rights, and so do property owners. Nobody
is contesting that. The real controversies begin when the exercise of
putative "rights" spills over the borders and property lines and
affect others. That is why we
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 1/12/01 5:27:27 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
You statement is unquestionably true - however I fail miserably
when I try to understand how a self-professed anarchist ends up
supporting a government, laws, a judicial system.
I will
-Caveat Lector-
You statement is unquestionably true - however I fail miserably when I
try to understand how a self-professed anarchist ends up supporting a
government, laws, a judicial system.
It's not my statement. I don't support it. I passed it on. That's what
the "FW" in the Subject field
-Caveat Lector-
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001 18:33:50 EST Carl Amedio [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 1/12/01 5:27:27 PM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You statement is unquestionably true - however I fail miserably
when I try to understand how a
-Caveat Lector-
On 12 Jan 2001, at 20:18, Jayson R. Jones wrote:
Carl Replies:
I will just speak for myself. Rational Anarchism acknowledges that
all government is inherently corrupt. It also understands stands
that humanity by its very nature, needs social
organization/government. hence
