-Caveat Lector-   <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">
</A> -Cui Bono?-

 <A
HREF="http://www.newsmax.com/articles/?a=2000/3/29/65250">Th
e
Ritalin Racketeers and Their Chemical Lobotomies–Part I</A>

http://www.newsmax.com/cgi-
bin/share.pl?p=articles&a=2000/3/29/65250&p
ath=arti

cles/archive

The Ritalin Racketeers and Their Chemical Lobotomies–Part I

Michael Savage
March 29, 2000

Dr. Michael Savage Interviews Dr. Peter R. Breggin
[Dr. Savage has a Ph.D. in Epidemiology and Human Nutrition from
U.C.,
Berkeley]

Savage: If you’ve heard Hillary Clinton’s recent remarks on Ritalin
and other drug use on children, you’ll find the usual, nauseating,
demagoguery. She appears to be urging Ritalin caution; but, if you
listen carefully, she’s calling it a miracle drug: "A God-send for
emotional and behavioral problems, for both children and their
parents." She insists her efforts are not an

attack on the medical treatment of children’s emotional well being
because the drugs are very, very "useful."

As with everything else the Clintons do, you’ve got to read between
the lines. So right now we’re going to read between the lines with an
expert who has a magnifying glass on the subject of Ritalin use. He
wrote an earlier book called Talking Back to Ritalin; What Doctors
Aren’t Telling You about Stimulants for Children. He’s been on this
program before. His name is Dr. Peter R. Breggin. He has a new book
out, and it’s called Reclaiming Our Children. You can get it at the
bookstore or at www.Breggin.com.

Dr. Breggin, welcome to the Savage Nation.

Breggin: What a pleasure to hear your backtalk to Hillary. You know,
there is such hypocrisy with her. I didn’t start out as a Clinton
basher; I started out hopeful years ago. What she’s doing here is
merely damage control because her drugs have come under criticism.

Savage: What do you mean by "her drugs"?

Breggin: In June of last year, following the school shootings, Hillary
and Tipper Gore, as well as their husbands, got together for the first
White

House conference on mental health. Because of her interest in mental
health and her own problem with anti-depressants, Tipper had been made
the expert, the psychiatric consultant to the president, duly
designated. She then created this conference. At the conference
Hillary showcased a psychiatrist named Kopowits of New York
University...

Savage: Oh, he’s a son-of-a-gun! He’s a drug peddler, in my opinion.
He had the nerve to say from his early studies on Ritalin that he
found it very

useful on children down to the age of two. He goes a step further and
says we should even use more of it.

Breggin: Yes, he does. You’re on top of this subject, Michael.

Savage: There’s nothing worse than poisoning our children’s minds.

Breggin: You know, the man Hillary introduced at the meeting goes so
far as to say that no amount of trauma to children--or poor parenting
or anything in their lives--causes them mental disorders. He says it’s
all biological and genetic and should be treated by drugs.

This is a guy who actually wrote in one of his books that sex abuse
doesn’t cause mental disorder unless the child has a biological
problem to start

with
in the brain.

Savage: So what is he? Some kind of a front for the drug companies?

Breggin: He’s the head of child and adolescent psychology at N.Y.U.

Savage: Let’s be clear on this guy. Is he a NaMBLA mentality, a member
of the North American Man Boy Love Association?

Breggin: No, I don’t think so. But it does come close to enabling
child abuse when he says that. Now the whole conference was this way.
Hillary even said that, whether or not teenagers want treatment, they
have to get it. So it’s involuntary treatment.

Savage: Dr. Breggin, please, let’s pause for a moment. I listened to
Hillary, and I heard the double talk. She’s so good at it, and I’m not
making this up, that the Communist Chinese have sent their cadres to
study her speeches.

They
say she’s the finest propagandist they’ve ever heard.

She claims she’s urging caution because of the outcry against the
doping up of our kids. But if you listen to the text of her
statements, she’s really saying they’re miracle drugs.

Breggin: Well, she’s also doing something that is, to me, an
abomination.
She’s giving money to N.I.M.H. (National Institute for Mental Health)
ultimately to conduct more experiments on two to four-year-olds. What
they’re going to do is conduct a lot of clinical studies which
actually drug two to four-year-olds.

Savage: You know, I’m so frightened of these two people, Bill and
Hillary, that I’m making an all-out effort to make the truth known
about these horrific practices.

In the last conversation we had about your earlier book, Talking Back
to

Ritalin, we showed that A.D.D. (1.) may not be a real diagnosis in
many cases, (2.) takes away the spontaneity in a child, and (3.) if a
boy shows symptoms of the "disease" called masculinity, he’s
immediately declared ill and put on a drug. This is very terrifying,
isn’t it?

Breggin: I think it’s absolutely horrifying. Since I was on your show
the last time, I was asked by the National Institute of Health to be
their scientific discussant on the effects of these drug at a big
conference they held. Beforehand, I reviewed all of the important
literature on the issue. Even with experiments on animals. When
they’re given these drugs they stop playing; they stop being curious;
they stop socializing; they stop trying to escape. We make good caged
animals with these drugs. And we make good caged kids by knocking
their spontaneity out of them. And, Michael, the other thing is that
these drugs enforce obsessive behavior.

Savage Amazing, they actually enforce obsessive behavior, which they
are

supposed to cure. We’re beginning to find out that many of the school
shootings are side reactions to Prozac-like medications. That’s a very
big hidden factor.

Breggin: Prozac and stimulants.

Savage: That’s right. We’re talking about the chemical lobotomy. We’re
talking about the chemical straightjacketing of our children. We are
talking about one of the greatest threats of all. But people can stand
up to the

school nurse; you can stand up to the teacher; you can stand up to the
principal; you can stand up to them with the facts and the right
books.

Dr. Breggin’s book can show you how to take your child back from the
authoritarian state that wants to dope your child up because he may be
misbehaving.

Dr. Breggin, when you say "reclaiming our children" you’re implying
that

they’ve been taken away from us, aren’t you?

Breggin: Absolutely. They’ve been taken away from us by the
psychiatric mental-health system. They’ve been taken away by the
educational system, by the government, and by many different forces.

Savage: From Hillary Clinton, in her own double-talking words, and
from others, we understand that our children have been stolen from us
by the state and by the psychiatric establishment.

You don’t know this, Dr. Breggin, for almost twenty years now I’ve
been trying to fight this battle. I’m not alone obviously, and you’ve
been fighting this battle a very long time yourself.

Why do you think Hillary Clinton has such a demonic desire to dope our
children? What is this all about?

Breggin: I think that one of the things that has happened is that
psychiatry has become the religion of liberalism. I come from a
liberal tradition. I’m Jewish. My dad was a liberal. What I’ve found
is that people who see themselves as thoughtful, caring, educated and
informed have swallowed psychiatry as the way.

I think that’s a major reason. Instead of turning in their own lives
to philosophy, religion, love, family life, or nature, they think of
psychiatry; and today that means the "pill" as an ultimate answer.
Also, if you have a desire for social control, "benevolent" control
and "benevolent" authority, then again biological psychiatry offers a
tremendous opportunity.

In part I’m just mystified. Here’s a woman, Hillary, who wrote a book
about it takes a "village" to raise children. It wasn’t about a book
about "it

takes a pill." There’s a "double think" that the modern person often
has. Anything that’s called "science" is accepted as an absolute and
sweeps reason away.

I would like to write my next book about what happened to critical
intelligence in America and how it’s been undermined by these really
shallow ideas about human life and nature.

Savage: Well, it’s these Utopian idealists like the Clintons who think
they really do have the answers. They think they’re following the best
minds of their generation, but they’re not the best minds. They don’t
realize that they may be the worst minds of their generation.

But to get back to brass tacks, we’ve found out that the Ritalin
epidemic is
so bad that psychological damage is being done to children as young as
two years of age. Infants are being put on speed. What’s amazing to
me, we’ve got the D.E.A. locking people up for selling crank, and here
we are giving crank to children. It’s an identical molecule, isn’t it?

Breggin: In some cases it is identical because methamphetamine is one
of the F.D.A. drugs allowed for children. The three basic stimulants
now are amphetamine, methamphetamine, and then Ritalin, which are all
in the same class and Schedule Two drugs along with cocaine, the most
addictive drug as recognized by all the world’s drug agencies.

Savage: Here’s what bothers me. The White House comes out and says
it’s going to do a major study of the effects on preschool-age
children using Ritalin, Prozac and other drugs. I know in advance what
the study’s going to say. The results are in before they even start.
They’re going to do a window-dressing control while praising the
overall need for the drugs. In the end they’re going to try to peddle
more drugs than before while making us think they’re clamping down;
that’s my guess.

Breggin: I think that’s right. They just got through doing that with a
big study they ballyhooed, called the M.T.A. study. The N.I.M.H. spent
multi-millions of dollars on it, and they’re going to do the same
thing now with little kids. And despite the millions spent, the
N.I.M.H. study wasn’t even conducted according to accepted scientific
procedures and is basically worthless.

Savage: Doctor, this reminds me of the sad state of experiments done
on little children by Kinsey. Kinsey, as you well know, was a complete
whacko. Most of his studies have been shown to be false.

Breggin: Yes, I know. He was sexually abusing those children and had
sex

abusers working for him to stimulate the babies.

Savage: He was a nut case who was using children as sex objects and
then

writing books about it to make it look legitimate. Yet his work is
still

quoted today as if it’s the gospel. The same mentality now prevails in
the Clinton White House and among those folks who think they’re going
to save our children by abusing them with drugs.

Tell us, Doctor, what can we do to protect active children. I
guarantee it; if I were a child today, they’d put me in a chemical
straightjacket. What could my mother do if they told her, " Your son
has A.D.D. according to our test, and we’re going to prescribe
medication for him"?

Breggin: I think the first thing parents need to start doing is
absolutely
refuse to cooperate with any psychological evaluation of children in
school. Schools should not be mental hospitals. Parents should say
that the only

tests they want their children to have are those respecting their
academic subjects and nothing else.

Savage: That’s interesting. You’ve basically implied that they’ve
turned our schools into something other than schools. What do you
think the government has in mind by turning our schools into little
clinics?

Breggin: It’s going to get even worse if Hillary follows her plan that
I

describe in Reclaiming Our Children. But even now in many, many
schools the nurses are giving out more drugs than were given out in
children’s mental hospitals when I was in training. You can go into a
school today and find that ten or twenty percent of the boys are on
drugs given by the school nurse. I just recently visited a school
where over half of the children were being given drugs.

The teachers are given something called the Connor’s Scale for the
students. Connors for decades has been trying to find ways to
control
kids with drugs. He goes right back to the sixties.. His scale is
basically a psychiatric

rating which is used to diagnose A.D.D. and A.D.H.D. Teachers
use this
scale in the classroom. They give the results to the school
psychologist, and then the parents are called in to face a team of
five people telling them that their child has A.D.H.D.

As I said, parents must refuse to cooperate with any psychological
evaluation of their children in school.

Savage: It’s a war to control our children. State control through
drugs,

just
as practiced in the Soviet Union. With Hillary and Tipper leading the
charge!

----end of forwarded message----

--
Kathleen

"It's a scientific fact that if you stay in California you lose one point of your IQ 
every year." -- Truman Capote

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soap-boxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to