suicide by all means do it. But I'm not
following you.
Jamie
-Original Message-
From: Kathleen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 11, 1999 4:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Fw: Smokers Fired
-Caveat Lector-
On 11 Oct 99, at 15:16, Stopforth, Jamie wrote
-Caveat Lector-
And then let's get rid of recreational drinkers. Alcohol is far more
harmful
than tobacco and is implicated in most crimes of violence. Make possession
of a beer a felony, or if that is deemed too severe, just tax alcohol until
a
sixpack costs consumers $29.99 ...
As a
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 1999 8:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Fw: Smokers Fired
-Caveat Lector-
To be quite honest. I'm tired of having to breath that stuff. It
happens
numerous times when I'm walking out to my car or just anywhere outside...
Smoking
-Caveat Lector-
On Wed, 13 Oct 1999, Tatman, Robert wrote:
Amen, Jamie. I am a former smoker who now suffers from chronic lung disease
(pulmonary sarcoidosis). Bluntly, other people's smoke makes me cough, and
enough of it can make it difficult for me to breathe.
Same here. Any form of smoke,
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 99-10-11 15:37:27 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
INTERESTING QUOTE: "...the Florida Supreme Court upheld the
rule. The court said lower insurance costs outweighed the privacy issue."
--
Source: Palm Beach Post
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 99-10-11 16:20:30 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Good, get rid of the smokers.
And then let's get rid of recreational drinkers. Alcohol is far more harmful
than tobacco and is implicated in most crimes of violence. Make possession
of a beer a felony, or if
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 10/12/99 3:57:32 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
If "lower insurance costs" is the bottom line, wouldn't it be as
cost-effective for employers to fire all employees who are over the age of
40, or in poor health?
More and more I
of the profit
motive...
-Original Message-
From: Das GOAT [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 1999 3:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Fw: Smokers Fired
-Caveat Lector-
snip
If "lower insurance costs" is the bottom line, wouldn't it be as
-Caveat Lector-
--
INTERESTING QUOTE: "...the Florida Supreme Court upheld the
rule. The
court said the lower insurance costs outweighed the privacy issue."
--
Source: Palm Beach Post
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 99-10-11 15:37:27 EDT, you write:
Can you imagine how loud they would scream if male homosexuals were denied
employment because they stand a better chance of getting AIDS?
The expanded rule to be considered Tuesday doesn't say how long new
hires must be
-Caveat Lector-
Good, get rid of the smokers.
-Original Message-
From: Kathleen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 11, 1999 2:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [CTRL] Fw: Smokers Fired
-Caveat Lector-
--
INTERESTING QUOTE
-Caveat Lector-
On 11 Oct 99, at 15:16, Stopforth, Jamie wrote:
-Caveat Lector-
Good, get rid of the smokers.
We'd be better off to get rid of the busybodies and bigots who want
to control what people do on their own time to their own bodies.
The difference between your statement and
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 10/11/1999 3:32:09 PM CST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We'd be better off to get rid of the busybodies and bigots who want
to control what people do on their own time to their own bodies.
The difference between your statement and that of good German
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 10/11/99 5:32:09 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
On 11 Oct 99, at 15:16, Stopforth, Jamie wrote:
-Caveat Lector-
Good, get rid of the smokers.
We'd be better off to get rid of the busybodies and bigots who want
to
14 matches
Mail list logo
