-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 99-02-09 17:33:50 EST, you write:
> You've never heard it suggested that it was a coup? I have heard that
> theory on numerous occasions.
********
Nixon? No, honestly. Never. But now I know that theory is out there.
> Subversive means? It was he that initiated the problem with Paula Jones.
> It was he that lied in testimony in a deposition in the subsequent
> sexual harassment case. It was he who used his position of power to
> influence the case.
********
The discussion began about a coup in general. That this one would be
based on subversive means is my opinion. **SIGH** I'm already on a poltical
discussion list and I'm tired of this issue. I didn't expect to find it on a
conspiracy list, and yet haven't been able to let everything slide by. If you
want to understand subversive.....look at Richard Mellon Scaife and the
Arkansas Project. Examine Starr's job-in-waiting at Pepperdine, examine
Starr's conflicts of interests (which he failed to point out, when asked,
before his appointment.) Look at Ted Olsen's involvement, and then watch his
"talking head wife" spin on news shows and on and on.....ad nauseum.
Why did Starr approach James Carville in an airport and "spout a shameful
tirade" against the President and tell him, "Your boy's getting rolled" in
1993, before Starr was even appointed as IC?
As for Paula Jones' version of events, I simply don't believe them. As
for his influencing the case....the Judge dismissed the case even assuming all
her allegations were true.
Are you concerned about Starr's alleged solicitation of perjury and
obstruction of justice in the GM case? 60 Minutes just did a segment on it.
Or is that just "liberal media claptrap?" Is outrage at Clinton blind? Or
does the "moral purity" standard apply to everyone? Sheesh. There are none
so blind .......
>
> If Clinton is impeached and Gore takes over as president and then the
> Senate refuses to approve his choice, then you might have a point.
> Otherwise, you are just making suppositions.
>
> Howard Davis
******
Howard.....that MUST be why I used so many "IFS." Any speculation about
the future is just that -- specualtion. Clinton's apointments have been
unconscionably delayed. I "suppose" the appointment of a VP, should the need
arise, would be delayed, too.
**SIGH**
Samantha
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
