Taliban lying in wait, experts say

http://onenews.nzoom.com/news_detail/0,1227,64481-1-5,00.html

Instead of fearing death, they crave it.

If they run from a battle, it is not to escape attack but rather to sucker
their enemy into chasing them.

Many lurk patiently inside a labyrinthine network of caves and tunnels,
waiting for the day that American troops come looking for them.

To make one wrong move against the estimated 50,000 fighters of
Afghanistan's Taliban movement is to risk disaster, according to military
experts who are versed in the militia's fighting strategies. There are no
good ways to fight them, the experts say, but many ways to be beaten by
them.

As the US military moves into the expected next stage in its Afghanistan
war - stepped-up ground assaults - strategists face some perplexing
questions regarding the unusual enemy they now confront.

The Taliban and its mostly Arab ally, al-Qaeda, possess such a potent
mixture of ruthlessness, patience, and guerrilla tactical skills that they
are proving to be the most formidable fighting force the US has faced
since the ill-fated US war in Vietnam.

"They are proven to be tough warriors," said Rear Admiral John
Stufflebeem, Pentagon deputy director of operations for current readiness
and capabilities. "We're in an environment they, obviously, are experts
in, and it is extremely harsh. I am a bit surprised at how doggedly
they're hanging on to power."

Pentagon and independent military strategists are so confounded by Taliban
and al-Qaeda tactics, they are turning to a new doctrine, called
"fourth-generation warfare," to help identify ways to fight them,
according to the independent group Defence and the National Interest.

The doctrine focuses on warfare beyond the earlier generations of classic
infantry and guerrilla combat, where borders, armies, and a clash of
political philosophies tended to shape the way wars were fought and
resolved.

"Fourth generation," according to the group, "includes all forms of
conflict where the other side refuses to stand up and fight fair."

Typical of any fourth-generation movement such as the Taliban and
al-Qaeda, Defence and the National Interest says, is its ability largely
to sidestep conventional fighting forces.

"It is a strange form of warfare, one where military force plays a much
smaller (though still critical) role."

The US record in Afghanistan since it began attacking with massive air
power on October 7 underscores the point of how conventional military
force does not work against the Taliban, said retired Pakistani General
Talat Masood.

"I don't think they're doing anything incorrectly," he said of US military
strategists, but still, the Taliban has not retreated.

Three weeks of intense, round-the-clock bombardment - reportedly using
thousands of cruise missiles, laser-guided rockets, cluster bombs,
bunker-busting bombs, and hundreds of sorties by F-14s, Stealth bombers,
attack helicopters, and AC-130 gunships - seems not to have dramatically
altered the balance on the ground in Afghanistan, said Rifaat Hussain, a
respected Pakistani military analyst.

The opposition Northern Alliance finds itself stalled in an assault on two
frontline cities - Kabul and Mazar-e Sharif - whose capture would be
crucial in setting the stage for a larger US ground assault. Without
securing one of those cities, the US would have no established air bases
where it could land ground troops.

Even though the US spent the last week bombing the Taliban front line in
support of the Northern Alliance, the hard-line Muslim fighting force has
held its ground and, in some cases, forced the Northern Alliance to
retreat.

And despite a much-touted ground assault by more than 100 US special
forces troops, Pakistani military analysts noted that there have been no
US claims of success on the ground - and no additional reported ground
forays.

Key to Taliban and al-Qaeda survival against overwhelming US force is the
element of surprise. The groups are said to control a vast network of
caves and tunnels that riddle the Afghan countryside.

Yvonne Ridley, a British journalist who was captured by the Taliban in
late September and released just after the bombing campaign began, said
she got a first hand look at the network of hiding places at the Taliban's
disposal.

Her account, published in the Sunday Express newspaper after her release,
provides a narrative about "green plains, rivers and reservoirs,
magnificent mountains and literally hundreds of foxholes and caves. I
realise that President Bush's threat to 'smoke them out' is highly
unrealistic and futile."

A Pakistani who trained in Afghanistan in 1992 and remains active in a
Muslim militia allied with al-Qaeda said that the network of caves and
tunnels is not only intricate but also heavily fortified.

"The bunkers are very, very deep. They are very secure," said the man,
whose name is being withheld to protect him from possible retribution for
speaking to a reporter. The Pakistani said that, in addition to troops,
the caves contain a variety of arms, bombs, missiles, and other equipment.

The US could possess a map of such a cave and know its exact location, he
said, but it would do no good. "If you fire 1,000 missiles and you are
sure from the surface of the earth to 50 feet (15 metres) down (that)
there is nothing left, this will make no difference to the camp, because
it is in so deep."

Bin Laden, a civil engineer whose family owns one of Saudi Arabia's
biggest construction firms, has proved to be a master at constructing
fortified caves interlinked with tunnels. He and other mujahedeen fighters
used the cave network to devastating effect against Soviet troops during
their 1979-89 occupation of Afghanistan.

"If these guys are deep in the caves, you can't go in and get them,"
Hussain said. "I'm reviewing my history of the Soviet war right now,
recalling how the Afghans picked the Soviets apart by luring them into the
caves, the canyons, gullies, and gorges."

In addition, he said, the caves are big enough to store many of the 300
tanks the Taliban possesses, along with anti-aircraft missiles and a few
jet fighters.

But light arms, guerrilla tactics, and rapid deployment capabilities will
continue to be the Taliban's strong suit in combating the Americans, he
said.

Retired General Hamid Gul, who worked closely with mujahedeen forces while
serving as chief of the Pakistani Inter-Services Intelligence office, said
he expects the Taliban to withdraw into the hills and mountains and simply
wait patiently until US ground forces come looking for them.

"There will be a reserve force and then a second-line reserve force" left
in the cities, Gul said. "As soon as the cities are occupied by any
opposition (American or Northern Alliance), they will descend from the
hills, then go for their throats."

In addition, the Taliban will maintain a large network of armed civilian
loyalists waiting inside the cities and villages, Gul said. "They are like
mobs, armed mobs, sort of a militarised posse. Lots of people will just
get up from their villages" and descend on any invasion forces en masse.

"When it comes to tactical planning, they are extremely good," Gul said of
the Taliban.

Masood underscored the conundrum that US military strategists face in
converting the air-based campaign into a ground assault. To root out the
Taliban and al-Qaeda, the US must commit large numbers of ground forces -
a minimum of 20,000 troops, he said. When that amount proves inadequate,
more will be needed.

"When do you say, that's enough, no more?" he said. "It's not only the
forces on the ground but the 30,000 or 40,000 you need to support them."

But even worse, Masood said, the commitment of ground forces also plays
directly into the Taliban's hands.

"You are then fighting them exactly the way they want you to fight. You do
commando raids, and they will respond with guerrilla raids. It's their
skills versus your skills," Masood said. "You have mobility with
helicopters, but they are the ones with experience on the ground - and
it's their country. They have the numbers."

Speaking to reporters at the Pentagon, Admiral Stufflebeem said the US has
not underestimated the difficulty of the task in fighting the Taliban and
al-Qaeda.

"We've always had wars where you had clear lines and you knew clearly who
the enemy was. And this is no longer the case," he said.

"These are the kind of people who, one, want to survive to be able to rain
their terror and fear on others around the world, and they're very
patient," Admiral Stufflebeem said. "We're going to have to have equal
patience and we're going to have to have more determination to win. But
this is going to be a long, long campaign."

Gul said he is not optimistic about the prospects: "I think the US has
already walked into a trap."


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
<FONT COLOR="#000099">Internal Cell Phone Antenna
Boosts reception on all cellular phones.
Just $19.99 at Youcansave.com
</FONT><A HREF="http://us.click.yahoo.com/L11sED/PkNDAA/ySSFAA/xRZolB/TM";><B>Click 
Here!</B></A>
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds 
are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are sordid matters and 
'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-directions and outright frauds—is 
used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout 
the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always 
suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust 
denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Om 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Reply via email to