TELLING STATEMENTS MADE BY OFFICIALS -
1st Press Conference on JFK Jr. Crash

Conflicts With What Public Now Being Led to Believe


ALSO: Brand New "Hi-Tech" Airport At Martha's Vineyard!

AND: Light Pollution Cited as Increasing Problem In Area
Makes Kennedy's Purported "Disorientation" Even Less Likely!


© 1999 NewsHawk Inc.
All Rights Reserved
(Rights of UNALTERED reproduction/distribution hereby waived)


7.25.99
The first press briefing for news media on the disappearance of JFK Jr.'s
flight took place on Saturday evening, July 17 at the BRAND NEW,
state-of-the-art airport facility on Martha's Vineyard.

I quote below some relevant excerpts from an article on this event in
the Martha's Vineyard Times.


'The news that the plane piloted by John F. Kennedy Jr. disappeared en
route to Martha's Vineyard Friday night launched a media juggernaut
early Saturday morning. By Saturday night, reporters and cameramen from
around the country and the world had made their way to Martha's Vineyard
and gathered at the Martha's Vineyard Airport terminal for the first
official press briefing. 

'At the Martha's Vineyard Airport, Beth Toomey, West Tisbury police
chief, stepped into role of media ringmaster and set up an area for
satellite trucks and reporters and later helped organize the first press
briefing in an outside courtyard of the new airport terminal.


'Asked how a major news story comes together, Mr. Roberts...said that
with any big story the best chance to talk to people and gather
information was in the first three hours. "Later," he said, "people
become tight lipped and very official." '
END EXCERPT


The press briefing finally began some time shortly after 9 pm.

After some brief statements by public safety officials, 1st assistant
Cape & Islands DA  Michael O'Keefe and Massachusetts State Police Capt.
Robert Bird began answering answer reporters' questions. 

Questions about the plane, the flight, and the items recovered
dominated. One reporter with a foreign accent asked if "the debris is
being examined for explosives." "Not yet," was the answer.

When another reporter asked Captain Byrd, "Is this case being considered
a crime scene?", Cape & Islands DA O'Keefe HURRIEDLY took control of the
microphone to answer quickly and emphatically  "No!"......This IN NO WAY
SUGGESTS THAT THERE IS ANY INVESTIGATION OTHER THAN TO DETERMINE THE
IDENTITY OF THE DECEASED".

What is significant here is that not ONLY does this indicate an official
assumption less than 12 hours after the flight's disappearance that all
aboard were dead, it ALSO shows that without the slightest supportive
hard evidence of any kind and in fact with at least THREE eyewitnesses
reporting an AIRBORNE explosion southwest of Philbin Beach around
9:40-9:45 in the EXACT sector of he sky where the flight "went missing",
 officials had obviously ALREADY "concluded" that nothing criminal or
otherwise suspicious had happened to the plane! In other words, the
decision had already been made at high levels to spin-doctor the entire
event into being the result of pilot error or mechanical failure--as
opposed to having been blown out of the sky as it now is apparent it WAS.

Interestingly, however, Captain Byrd stated clearly in reference to
material evidence of the crash which may come ashore, that "POSSESSION
OF THIS EVIDENCE IS AN ARRESTABLE OFFENSE!! This warning means that any
person who took possession of any such material evidence would be
committing criminal action. It seems likely that at least some of this
material evidence WOULD NOT validate the official disinformation
accounts of the disaster.



The following excerpt from the Letters to the Editor section of the
Martha's Vineyard Times clearly refers not only to light pollution form
the NEW airport facility on the island but ALSO to increasingly severe
light pollution around the WHOLE ISLAND due to a new type of streetlight
having been just installed. These salient facts make the likelihood that
JFK JR. was unsure of is location, position, direction, altitude and
flight path even LESS likely!
=========================
Too Much Light at New Airport 

To the Editor: 
The Vineyard has taken another step towards becoming Orlando north. 
Last weekend, we took a late ferry back to the Vineyard after a few
weeks away. When we arrived at our house south of the Edgartown/Vineyard
Haven Road, turned off the car lights and stepped out of the car, I was
astonished to see the sky to the north of us lit up as brightly as the
Boston skyline. I drove north to discover that the new airport had
apparently been opened in our absence, and there were now 60 new roadway
lights in operation! Unlike the old street lights, which had their bulbs
up inside a reflector where they would illuminate the ground but be
shielded from the sky, these new lights are very bright and completely
unshielded. Not only do they direct much of their light upwards, the
glare from the bright, unshielded bulbs prevents you from seeing the
grounds clearly.
 
Considering The Martha's Vineyard Times series last year on the issue of
light pollution, numerous letters to the editors of the Gazette and The
Times about light pollution, the new Aquinnah building regulations
covering lighting, and letters to the airport commissioners pleading
with them to consider the issue of light pollution in the design of the
new airport, who was the genius who specified these new street lights?
They may have "architectural presence," but they destroy a large area of
night sky.
 
Please call and write the commissioners, demanding that they replace
these lights with ones that shield their bulbs from the sky, like the
new lights on the Vineyard Haven-Oak Bluffs causeway. We do not have to let
"progress" turn the Vineyard into just another metropolitan suburb. 

Peter Jones 
Belmont and Edgartown 
=======================
END


Well? 'Nuff said!


Reply via email to