-Caveat Lector-
Begin forwarded message:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: August 21, 2007 1:36:31 PM PDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Potential Chernobyl in Tennessee Kept Secret for 3 Years,
"National Security"
Tennessee Nuclear Fuel Problems Kept Secret
Monday August 20, 2007 9:01 PM
By DUNCAN MANSFIELD
http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,,-6863800,00.html
KNOXVILLE, Tenn. (AP) - A three-year veil of secrecy in the name of
national security was used to keep the public in the dark about the
handling of highly enriched uranium at a nuclear fuel processing
plant -- including a leak that could have caused a deadly,
uncontrolled nuclear reaction.
The leak turned out to be one of nine violations or test failures
since 2005 at privately owned Nuclear Fuel Services Inc., a
longtime supplier of fuel to the U.S. Navy's nuclear fleet.
The public was never told about the problems when they happened.
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission revealed them for the first time
last month when it released an order demanding improvements at the
company, but no fine.
In 2004, the government became so concerned about releasing nuclear
secrets that the commission removed more than 1,740 documents from
its public archive -- even some that apparently involved basic
safety violations at the company, which operates a 65-acre gated
complex in tiny Erwin, about 120 miles north of Knoxville.
Congressmen and environmental groups have criticized the policy,
and now the commission staff is drafting recommendations that may
ease its restrictions.
But environmental activists are still suspicious of the belated
revelations and may challenge the commission's decision not to fine
Nuclear Fuel Services for the safety violations.
``That party is not over -- the full story of what is going on up
there,'' said Ann Harris, a member of the Sierra Club's national
nuclear task force.
Nuclear Fuel Services has been supplying fuel to the Navy since the
1960s. More recently, it has also been converting the government's
stockpile of weapons-grade uranium into commercial reactor fuel.
While reviewing the commission's public Web page in 2004, the
Department of Energy's Office of Naval Reactors found what it
considered protected information about Nuclear Fuel Service's work
for the Navy.
The commission responded by sealing every document related to
Nuclear Fuel Services and BWX Technologies in Lynchburg, Va., the
only two companies licensed by the agency to manufacture, possess
and store highly enriched uranium.
BWX Technologies has not experienced any problems as serious as the
uranium spill at Nuclear Fuel Services, commission spokesman David
McIntyre said. But its operations were included in the order to
seal documents because it produces nuclear fuel for the Navy, too.
Under the policy, all the documents were stamped ``Official Use
Only,'' including papers about the policy itself and more than
1,740 documents from the commission's public archive.
The Associated Press first reported the policy in May after the
commission briefly mentioned in its annual report to Congress a
March 6, 2006, uranium leak at Nuclear Fuel Services. The leak was
one of three ``abnormal occurrences'' of license holders cited
during the year.
Agency commissioners, apparently struck by the significance of the
event, took a special vote to skirt the ``Official Use Only'' rule
so that Nuclear Fuel Services would be identified in the report as
the site of the uranium leak.
Some 35 liters, or just over 9 gallons, of highly enriched uranium
solution leaked from a transfer line into a protected glovebox and
spilled onto the floor. The leak was discovered when a supervisor
saw a yellow liquid ``running into a hallway'' from under a door,
according to one document.
The commission said there were two areas, the glovebox and an old
elevator shaft, where the solution potentially could have collected
in such a way to cause an uncontrolled nuclear reaction.
``It is likely that at least one worker would have received an
exposure high enough to cause acute health effects or death,'' the
agency wrote.
``We don't want any security information out there that's going to
help a terrorist,'' agency Commissioner Edward McGaffigan Jr. said
in a newly released transcript from a closed commission meeting May
30. But ``that's entirely separate'' from dealing with an event
that could have killed a worker at the plant.
``The pendulum maybe swung too far,'' agreed Luis Reyes, the
commission's executive director for operations. ``We want to make
sure we don't go the other way, but we need to come back to some
reasonable middle point.''
Agency spokesman David McIntyre said it may be difficult to
separate Nuclear Fuel Service's secret work for the Navy from its
public work converting bomb-grade uranium to commercial reactor
fuel. The leak happened on the commercial reactor side.
In a stinging letter to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission chairman
in July, two Democratic congressman from Michigan also blasted the
policy.
``We agree that NRC should withhold from public view any sensitive
security information of this nature. However, NRC went far beyond
this narrow objective,'' read the letter from John Dingell,
chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, and Bart
Stupak, chairman of the Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee.
McIntyre defended the commission's decision not to fine Nuclear
Fuel Services, even though the agency rated the uranium leak last
year as its second most-serious violation.
Instead, the agency ordered Nuclear Fuel Services to conduct a full
review of its ``safety culture'' and make changes using outside
experts.
``If we can get long-term permanent changes and improvements in
their process it is better than slapping them with a fine every
time something goes wrong,'' McIntyre said.
Nuclear Fuel Services Executive Vice President Timothy Lindstrom, a
Navy veteran who joined the company in September, said the company
had already made ``significant progress.''
``I think it is important that the public recognize that we do have
a very robust safety program at NFS. We live in this community and
take our stewardship very seriously,'' he said.
``I think if we were to have an event like this again, we would
push to make it public,'' he added. ``Clearly it would have been
better to have this discussion 18 months ago than it is to have it
now.''
Meanwhile, NFS told its 700 employees this past week it will be
``exploring the possibility of a sale'' over the next 12 months --
not because of the commission's disclosure, but because of the
company's increasing value to a booming nuclear power industry.
``We are in a position of strength,'' company spokesman Tony
Treadway said.
Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL.com.
www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substanceânot soap-boxingâplease! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'âwith its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright fraudsâis used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/
<A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om