-Caveat Lector-

from:
http://www.aci.net/kalliste/chinintr.htm
<A HREF="http://www.aci.net/kalliste/chinintr.htm">Introduction to the
Chinese Edition</A>
-----

International Financial Markets

Introduction to the Chinese Edition

The chairman of a finance department of a major university once told me
he had learned "so much" from reading my textbook. I cynically thought:
He has been a professor of finance for fifteen years. Why should he have
anything to learn from an introductory textbook? Then a few minutes
later he said: "But there is nothing new in it."



Many people look at knowledge as a collection of objects, and the search
for something "new" means discovery of a new thing, term, or product.
But most of knowledge actually lies not in a mere cognizance of what
things are, but rather in an understanding of the relationships or
connections among them. That’s what economics is about. That’s what my
book is about. I was not surprised that a finance chairman had learned
so much from a book in which there was "nothing new." You may know what
eurodollars are, or what options are, but understanding them is a
different thing entirely. The first rule of teaching, the Tao Te Ching
reminds us, is to create confusion in those who think they know. Out of
this confusion can emerge understanding: a new way of seeing the
relationships among familiar things.



I myself learned very little of the information presented here in the
classroom. Most of it I had to learn on my own: from other sources or my
own observations. So when I wrote the book, I was writing it mostly to
myself, to summarize what I was learning. To the extent I thought of it
as a textbook, I tried to write the type of textbook I wished I had had
in graduate school, but hadn’t. Necessarily I wrote it simply to please
myself, and while I hoped others would like it also, I had little
assurance they would. For my writing a textbook aroused great hostility.
Junior professors were not supposed to write textbooks. They were
supposed to spend their time writing research papers on the trendy (and
often absurd) theories of senior professors. Well, I chose not to follow
that path. And I don’t regret it. A number of those who advised me I was
"doing the wrong thing" immediately adopted my book once it appeared. My
few successes in life have all come from "doing the wrong thing."



Does this book have any relevance for China? Perhaps. One might observe
that the future development of China is heavily dependent on foreign
investment. International business is increasingly important to the
development of the local Chinese economy. An understanding of the
financial markets and contracts prevalent in Europe, Japan, and the
United States should be considered an essential prerequisite for any
Chinese business manager. Of course the markets tolerate amateurs, but
usually not in a way amateurs would like. That’s one reason to study
this book.



A second reason is intellectual. If China is to emerge from its economic
isolation, it must understand what is happening in the rest of the
world. And that includes understanding the often-baffling financial
markets of the world. These require specific study. Simply reading the
newspaper for many years will not do the trick.



At the time of writing, Asia is very much in the world’s eye. Following
on of the heels of the Asian financial crisis in the latter half of
1997, the burning question in Asia is whether there will be a
devaluation of the renminbi. What should or will China do? Will the
battered economies of South Korea, Indonesia, Thailand, and Hong Kong be
allowed to sell their goods without significant competition from the
Chinese mainland? Meanwhile, the Beijing government is debating the
question whether it is time that banks be run like banks. The obvious
answer, of course, is yes. But that doesn’t mean the damage done by not
running banks like banks can be easily undone. And that doesn’t mean the
speculation and build-up of debt in the coastal regions of China will
casually disappear. This book gives a variety of tools for looking at
these and similar issues.



It’s important not to let the veil of words--or the veil of business
practice--get in the way. There was a famous finance professor of my
acquaintance who hated derivative contracts. People who talked about, or
studied, things like futures and options upset him so much that he would
practically froth at the mouth. Meanwhile, his office neighbored another
university department: the Insurance Department. This same professor
thought insurance was a respectable subject, greatly worthy of academic
study. What he did not understand--because he refused to look--was that
most insurance contracts can be analyzed and understood in terms of
option pricing theory. He died never knowing that "insurance" and
"options" were essentially the same thing appearing in two different
disguises, and thoroughly convinced that he loved one and hated the
other. One must not be deceived by the Monkey King’s chosen outward
appearance.



>From an outsider’s perspective, there are two Chinas: the mainland, and
the "bamboo network" of overseas Chinese. The latter, for most practical
purposes, includes Hong Kong, Taiwan, and the Chinese communities of the
Philippines, Malaysia, Indonesia, and Thailand. There are estimates
(although one should never take these too seriously) that the 50 million
"overseas" Chinese control an economy roughly comparable to that of the
1.2 billion mainlanders. Maybe so. Maybe not. But this community has
extraordinary importance for China’s future. For those of us who view
China as a civilization, rather than as a government, they are very much
part of the Chinese system. And this community has their hands deep
inside world financial markets. This book can help them grasp that
market forces are a different type of guanxi.



Finally, there is the individual student. When I was teaching in the
1980s, two of my students were working on a project together. One was
the foreign exchange manager for Daewoo Corporation, one of the large
Korean chaebol, or conglomerates, and the other was a Chinese friend of
his from Taiwan, whom I will call Billy. I thought it would be useful
for them to visit the floor of the Philadelphia Stock Exchange, and made
arrangements for a friend who worked for the now-defunct investment bank
Drexel, Burnham, Lambert to give them a tour. Foreign currency options
were new at the time, and there was not much business. Yet there were
plenty of traders already in the market, anticipating future growth. On
this particular day, a woman broker appeared in the crowd of floor
traders with a limit order to sell, and about a half dozen traders
simultaneously shouted their acceptance of the price and lunged for the
ticket. The woman fell on the floor with several traders on top of her.
Two of the traders emerged from the melee holding the ticket, both
claiming possession, and proceeded to have a fist fight over who would
be the counterparty to the trade. This was not, of course,
exchange-approved behavior, but Billy, who had recently gotten out of
the Taiwanese army, was quite impressed.



"Now I understand trading," he said. "This is war."



Yes, I suppose it is, in a way. Markets are certainly a more
constructive form of battle than the nonsense implied by the current
militaristic rhetoric emerging from Washington (and from Beijing also).



To students: Here is your guide. Go forth and do battle.



J. Orlin Grabbe
-----
Aloha, He'Ping,
Om, Shalom, Salaam.
Em Hotep, Peace Be,
Omnia Bona Bonis,
All My Relations.
Adieu, Adios, Aloha.
Amen.
Roads End
Kris

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to