-Caveat Lector-
June:
Absolutely! If we are to judge Drudge (:-) on the merits of his
"journalistic prowess," then let's use his words and not what he does or
does not do below the waist. Then, if we find that he is a scum-raker, we
won't feel so bad about or our analysis.
But then again, if
-Caveat Lector-
On Sun, 21 Feb 1999, Edward Britton wrote:
But then again, if we're going to judge Clinton on the sole merits of his
sexual exploits, I guess all's fair. Be careful where we tread here; we may
be found to be hypocrits :-)
As far as I understand it, Drudge has only been accused
