-Caveat Lector-

Please send as far and wide as possible.

Thanks,

Robert Sterling
Editor, The Konformist
http://www.konformist.com


Who Will Own the Internet?
George Mokray
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

This comes from a trusted source.

Phil Agre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
=-=
This message was forwarded through the Red Rock Eater News Service
(RRE).
You are welcome to send the message along to others but please do not
use
the "redirect" option.  For information about RRE, including
instructions
for (un)subscribing, see
http://dlis.gseis.ucla.edu/people/pagre/rre.html
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
=-=

Friday, May 11, 2001
Debra Sweezey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Telecom Act Nixed -- Feds Hand Bells the Net


This is very likely to be a headline you'll read in next week's paper.
When it happens -- and it is happening -- ISPs and CLECs are history,
and monopolies rule again.  You have just a few weeks to change
tomorrow's history, and you have the world's greatest tool for change
right at your fingertips.

Post notices on news groups, use your mailing list, chat, whatever,
as long as you CALL FOR ACTION NOW!  There is federal legislation
that threatens to hand the Bells the Net.  It is called H.R. 1542,
misleadingly named the Broadband Relief Act of 2001.  It is authored
by two very powerful Congressmen, House Commerce Chairman W.J. "Billy"
Tauzin (R-LA) and Ranking Minority Member John Dingell (D-MI), and
supported - surprise, surprise, by only four companies.  Perhaps
you've heard of them: SBC, Verizon, Bell South and Qwest.

In essence, the bill allows the RBOCs to immediately begin offering
long-distance data service, and eliminates the Telecom Act's
requirement that they lease parts of their networks -- including
equipment used for high-speed Internet service -- to competitors.
Out goes the competition, up go the prices.

Share this information with your friends, family, customers,
colleagues today!  Beg them to make their voices heard.  Do
they really want the local phone monopoly running the Internet?
Do they want higher prices, lousy service, and no new technology?

USISPA, the US Internet Service Providers Alliance, is comprised of
ISPs and ISP state association across the country, and we are working
in the trenches trying to protect consumers and the Internet from the
Bell monopolies.  We need your help in letting Congress know that what
they're trying to do, on the Bells' dime, is not okay with America.

We willing and ready to help you any way we can.  Please call or email
Debra Sweezey of the US Internet Service Providers Alliance, and we'll
give you all the information you need.  We will give you the contact
information for your local representative in addition to sample
statements or letters, or we're happy to contact your representative
on your behalf.  Whatever's easiest for you.

We hope you will join the fight for a free and open Internet.  We need
you!

This message comes to you through the United States Internet Service
Providers Alliance (USISPA), an alliance of state ISP associations
and ISP across the country working to ensure a fair and competitive
open telecommunications environment nationwide.  For more info
or to find how you can help USISPA help you, email Debra Sweezey,
Project Director for USISPA, at [EMAIL PROTECTED] or call her at
202-326-0440.

=====
Debra Sweezey
Project Director, USISPA
202.326.0440
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

*****

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Internet Freedom and Broadband Deployment Act of 2001 (Introduced in
the
House)
HR 1542 IH
107th CONGRESS

1st Session

H. R. 1542

To deregulate the Internet and high speed data services, and for other
purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

April 24, 2001
Mr. TAUZIN (for himself, Mr. DINGELL, Mr. GOODLATTE, Mr. BOUCHER, Mr.
ENGLISH, Mr. FROST, Mr. SMITH of Washington, Mr. LUCAS of Kentucky,
Mr.
WHITFIELD, Mr. MURTHA, Mr. COLLINS, Mr. BLAGOJEVICH, Mr. FOSSELLA, Mr.
DICKS, Mr. GILLMOR, Mr. BARTON of Texas, Mr. KIND, Mr. GREENWOOD, Mr.
MEEKS of New York, Mr. CAMP, Mr. BALDACCI, Mr. RAHALL, Mr. HOLDEN,
Mrs.
MCCARTHY of New York, Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania, Mr. SIMPSON, Mr.
BOYD,
Mrs. NORTHUP, Mr. ENGEL, Mr. SANDLIN, Mr. EVERETT, Mr. BOEHNER, Mr.
REYNOLDS, Mr. WELDON of Pennsylvania, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. BONIOR, Mr.
MALONEY of Connecticut, Mr. BUYER, Mr. CUNNINGHAM, Mr. MCCRERY, Mr.
BISHOP, Mr. LAMPSON, Mr. VITTER, Mr. BASS, Mr. ACKERMAN, Mr. BLUNT,
Mr.
MCHUGH, Mr. RYAN of Wisconsin, Mr. QUINN, Mr. BACA, Mr. GONZALEZ, Mr.
BAKER, Mr. WALSH, Mr. GREEN of Texas, Mr. WEXLER, Mr. OXLEY, Mr.
RADANOVICH, Mr. DIAZ-BALART, Mr. COOKSEY, Mr. CLEMENT, Mr. LARSEN of
Washington, Mr. SCHROCK, Mr. PETRI, Mr. WATKINS, Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN, Mr.
HILLIARD, Mr. OTTER, Mr. SHADEGG, Mr. BRYANT, Mr. PLATTS, Mr. PUTNAM,
Mr. CUMMINGS, Mr. RODRIGUEZ, Mr. CONDIT, Mr. BURR of North Carolina,
and
Mr. WYNN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Energy and Commerce
A BILL

To deregulate the Internet and high speed data services, and for other
purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United
States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `Internet Freedom and Broadband
Deployment
Act of 2001'.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSE.
(a) FINDINGS- Congress finds the following:
(1) Internet access services are inherently interstate and
international
in nature, and should therefore not be subject to regulation by the
States.
(2) The imposition of regulations by the Federal Communications
Commission and the States has impeded the rapid delivery of high speed
Internet access services to the public, thereby reducing consumer
choice
and welfare.
(3) The Telecommunications Act of 1996 represented a careful balance
between the need to open up local telecommunications markets to
competition and the need to increase competition in the provision of
interLATA voice telecommunications services.
(4) In enacting the prohibition on Bell operating company provision of
interLATA services, Congress recognized that certain
telecommunications
services have characteristics that render them incompatible with the
prohibition on Bell operating company provision of interLATA services,
and exempted such services from the interLATA prohibition.
(5) High speed data services and Internet access services constitute
unique markets that are likewise incompatible with the prohibition on
Bell operating company provision of interLATA services.
(6) Since the enactment of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, the
Federal Communications Commission has construed the prohibition on
Bell
operating company provision of interLATA services in a manner that has
impeded the development of advanced telecommunications services,
thereby
limiting consumer choice and welfare.
(7) Internet users should have choice among competing Internet service
providers.
(8) Internet service providers should have the right to interconnect
with high speed data networks in order to provide service to Internet
users.
(b) PURPOSES- It is therefore the purpose of this Act to provide
market
incentives for the rapid delivery of advanced telecommunications
services--
(1) by deregulating high speed data services and Internet access
services;
(2) by clarifying that the prohibition on Bell operating company
provision of interLATA services does not extend to the provision of
high
speed data services and Internet access services;
(3) by ensuring that consumers can choose among competing Internet
service providers; and
(4) by ensuring that Internet service providers can interconnect with
competitive high speed data networks in order to provide Internet
access
service to the public.
SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS
(a) AMENDMENTS- Section 3 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C.
153) is amended--
(1) by redesignating paragraph (20) as paragraph (21);
(2) by redesignating paragraphs (21) through (52) as paragraphs (24)
through (54), respectively;
(3) by inserting after paragraph (19) the following new paragraph:
`(20) HIGH SPEED DATA SERVICE- The term `high speed data service´
means any service that consists of or includes the offering of a
capability to transmit, using a packet-switched or successor
technology,
information at a rate that is generally not less than 384 kilobits per
second in at least one direction.´;
(4) by inserting after paragraph (22) the following new paragraphs:
`(23) INTERNET- The term `Internet´ means collectively the myriad of
computer and telecommunications facilities, including equipment and
operating software, which comprise the interconnected world-wide
network
of networks that employ the Transmission Control Protocol/Internet
Protocol, or any predecessor or successor protocols to such protocol,
to
communicate information of all kinds by wire or radio.
`(24) INTERNET ACCESS SERVICE- The term `Internet access service´
means (A) a service that combines computer processing, information
storage, protocol conversion, and routing with transmission to enable
users to access Internet content and services, and (B) the
transmission
of such service, but does not include the portion of such transmission
from the user to the provider of such service.´.
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS-
(1) Section 230(f) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 230
(f))
is amended--
(A) by striking paragraph (1); and
(B) by redesignating paragraphs (2) through (4) as paragraphs (1)
through (3), respectively.
(2) Section 223(h)(2) of such Act (47 U.S.C. 223(h)(2)) is amended by
striking `230(f)(2)´ and inserting `230(f)(1)´.
SEC. 4. LIMITATION ON AUTHORITY TO REGULATE HIGH SPEED DATA SERVICES.
(a) IN GENERAL- Part I of title II of the Communications Act of 1934
(47
U.S.C. 201 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new
section:
`SEC. 232. PROVISION OF HIGH SPEED DATA SERVICES.
`(a) FREEDOM FROM REGULATION- Except to the extent that high speed
data
service and Internet access service are expressly referred to in this
Act, neither the Commission, nor any State, shall have authority to
regulate the rates, charges, terms, or conditions for, or entry into
the
provision of, any high speed data service or Internet access service,
or
to regulate the facilities used in the provision of either such
service.
`(b) SAVINGS PROVISION- Nothing in this section shall be construed to
limit or affect the authority of any State to regulate voice telephone
exchange services, nor affect the rights of cable franchise
authorities
to establish requirements that are otherwise consistent with this Act.
`(c) CONTINUED ENFORCEMENT OF ESP EXEMPTION, UNIVERSAL SERVICE RULES
PERMITTED- Nothing in this section shall affect the ability of the
Commission to retain or modify--
`(1) the exemption from interstate access charges for enhanced service
providers under Part 69 of the Commission´s Rules; or
`(2) rules issued pursuant to section 254.´.
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT- Section 251 of the Communications Act of
1934
(47 U.S.C. 251) is amended by adding at the end thereof the following
new subsection:
`(j) EXEMPTION-
`(1) IN GENERAL- Notwithstanding the provisions of subsections (c) and
(d), the Commission shall not require an incumbent local exchange
carrier to--
`(A) provide unbundled access to any network elements used in the
provision of any high speed data service, other than those network
elements described in section 51.319 of the Commission´s regulations
(47 C.F.R. 51.319), as in effect on January 1, 1999; or
`(B) offer for resale at wholesale rates any high speed data service.
`(2) AUTHORITY TO REDUCE ELEMENTS SUBJECT TO REQUIREMENT- Paragraph
(1)(A) shall not prohibit the Commission from modifying the regulation
referred to in that paragraph to reduce the number of network elements
subject to the unbundling requirement, or to forbear from enforcing
any
portion of that regulation in accordance with the Commission´s
authority under section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996,
notwithstanding any limitation on that authority in section 10 of this
Act.´.
SEC. 5. INTERNET CONSUMERS FREEDOM OF CHOICE.
Part I of title II of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended by
section 4, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
`SEC. 233. INTERNET CONSUMERS FREEDOM OF CHOICE.
`(a) PURPOSE- It is the purpose of this section to ensure that
Internet
users have freedom of choice of Internet service provider.
`(b) OBLIGATIONS OF INCUMBENT LOCAL EXCHANGE CARRIERS- Each incumbent
local exchange carrier has the duty to provide--
`(1) Internet users with the ability to subscribe to and have access
to
any Internet service provider that interconnects with such carrier´s
high speed data service;
`(2) any Internet service provider with the right to acquire the
facilities and services necessary to interconnect with such carrier´s
high speed data service for the provision of Internet access service;
and
`(3) any Internet service provider with the ability to collocate
equipment in accordance with the provisions of section 251, to the
extent necessary to achieve the objectives of paragraphs (1) and (2)
of
this subsection.
`(c) DEFINITIONS- As used in this section--
`(1) INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDER- The term `Internet service provider´
means any provider of Internet access service.
`(2) INCUMBENT LOCAL EXCHANGE CARRIER- The term `incumbent local
exchange carrier´ has the same meaning as provided in section
251(h).´.
SEC. 6. INCIDENTAL INTERLATA PROVISION OF HIGH SPEED DATA AND INTERNET
ACCESS SERVICES.
(a) INCIDENTAL INTERLATA SERVICE PREMITTED- Section 271(g) of the
Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 271(g)) is amended--
(1) by striking `or´ at the end of paragraph (5);
(2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (6) and inserting
`;
or´; and
(3) by adding at the end thereof the following new paragraph:
`(7) of high speed data service or Internet access service.´.
(b) PROHIBITION ON MARKETING VOICE SERVICES- Section 271 of such Act
is
amended by adding at the end thereof the following new subsection:
`(k) PROHIBITION ON MARKETING VOICE TELEPHONE SERVICES- Until the date
on which a Bell operating company is authorized to offer interLATA
services originating in an in-region State in accordance with the
provisions of this section, such Bell operating company offering any
high speed data service or Internet access service pursuant to the
provisions of paragraph (7) of subsection (g) may not, in such in-
region
State market, bill, or collect for interLATA voice telecommunications
service obtained by means of the high speed data service or Internet
access service provided by such company.´.
(c) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS-
(1) Section 272(a)(2)(B)(i) of such Act is amended to read as follows:
`(i) incidental interLATA services described in paragraphs (1), (2),
(3), (5), (6), and (7) of section 271(g).´.
(2) Section 272(a)(2)(C) of such Act is repealed.

Black is white and white is black. Deregulation is monopoly. Freedom
of
choice is the lack of such freedom. This is how Congress presents
legislation.

http://community.webtv.net/Save CherryHill/AkerRGICorporate


If you are interested in a free subscription to The
Konformist Newswire,  please visit:

http://www.eGroups.com/list/konformist

Or, e-mail  [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
subject: "I NEED 2 KONFORM!!!"

(Okay, you can use something else, but it's a kool
catch phrase.)

Visit the Klub Konformist at Yahoo!:
http://clubs.yahoo.com/clubs/klubkonformist




Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to