-Caveat Lector-

WJPBR Email News List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peace at any cost is a prelude to war!


STRATFOR.COM
Global Intelligence Update
November 10, 1999

Moldova Calls IMF's Bluff


Summary:

Another former Soviet state is suffering political upheaval because
its leaders have failed to agree on an issue of strategic
significance: whether the country should tilt to the West or to the
east toward Russia. In a vote of no confidence, the parliament of
Moldova dismissed the government Nov. 9 after a dispute over
economic reforms needed for a new round of International Monetary
Fund (IMF) loans. Moldova now joins Lithuania in blanching at the
cost of joining the West - an increasingly common reaction in the
former Soviet states.


Analysis:

Moldova’s parliament voted no confidence in Prime Minister Ion
Sturza and his government on Nov. 9 in a disagreement over economic
policy. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) had conditioned
future loans on a series of Western-style reforms, including
government divestiture of the country’s tobacco and wine industries
- two of the country’s three chief industries. Though relatively
isolated in southeastern Europe, Moldova is now engaged in a
struggle that has larger strategic implications for the region.

The parliament voted 58-42 to oust Sturza’s government. The
Alliance for Democracy and Reforms, which created the Sturza
Cabinet just nine months ago, abstained from the vote. The
Communists and the Popular Front will now form a coalition to
choose a new government, which will be appointed by President Petru
Lucinschi within 10 days.

Essentially, the government fell because of Western demands. With
its economy and currency in decline, the country has been due to
receive a $35 million installment of funds from the IMF. However
the transfer has been contingent on the government meeting certain
demands. It must amend its 1999 budget, approve the 2000 budget and
privatize the wine and tobacco industries.

The IMF played hardball, insisting that these conditions be met
quickly and that the reformist Sturza government remain in place.
Richard Haass, the IMF mission chief, said Nov. 5 that the
government needed to meet all three requirements by early December
and that efforts to dismiss the current reformist government would
only interfere with loan approval. Sturza’s government tried to
push through privatization legislation and the 1999 budget
amendments last week. Sturza said he would resign if the bills were
not adopted.

The parliament quickly took him up on his offer. It rejected the
bills Nov. 5, and the IMF indefinitely suspended all loans to
Moldova. Since IMF funds are delayed, other loans are now in
jeopardy. Financing from the World Bank, the European Bank for
Reconstruction Development and the European Union - totaling $150
million, alongside the IMF funds - could all be postponed.

Moldova’s economy is in dire straits. The value of the leu,
Moldova’s national currency, has dropped by 50 percent against the
dollar in the past year. The external debt is $235 million, with a
heavy amount owed to the Russian oil giant, Gazprom. Perhaps worst
of all, Moldova’s economy rests on the success of Russia’s economy.

Moldova’s economy is now in an even more precarious position. In
fact, Parliament Chairman Dumitru Diacov said recently that the
failure to receive the IMF tranche and its associated World Bank
credits will lead to a collapse of the Moldovan budget system. As
in Lithuania, Moldova’s national administration is dealing with
issues of incredible domestic significance and is opting to risk
relative economic stability.

Nearly a decade to the day after the fall of the Berlin wall,
former Soviet states along Russia’s western periphery are
struggling through a deep crisis. Should they orient themselves to
the West or back to the East? The West has charged a high price for
entry: imposing wrenching economic reforms that in turn threaten
the rigid social and political structures of the former Soviet
states. When put to the test, many of these states find that they
simply lack the will and wherewithal to continue down the hard path
to the West.

Just last month, Lithuania’s government split over a similar
economic choice [ http://www.stratfor.com/SERVICES/GIU/102299.ASP ].
Now, Moldova is also struggling with the decision of whether to
orient itself towards Russia or the West. Alexander Moshanu, head
of the ruling coalition in Chisinau, told ITAR-Tass that the
"resignation of the pro-Western Cabinet of Ion Sturza signifies
Moldova’s refusal to integrate into Europe and its turn to the CIS
and Russia." Russia could exploit the opportunity in Moldova by
offering aid, but so far has not.

A disease is taking root in some of the former Soviet states, from
the Baltics down into Eastern Europe. The cause is the same but the
patient reacts in different ways. Georgia’s parliamentary elections
led to victory for the pro-Western faction while Ukraine’s
presidential contest has turned into a runoff between the Communist
candidate and pro-Western President Leonid Kuchma. In Lithuania,
the prime minister and two key ministers resigned rather than take
part in spending the country’s treasury on modernizing the oil
industry for a western company.

In Moldova, the situation is reversed. The president has remained
in power while the pro-Western Cabinet has resigned after a losing
battle. It seems that neither Western aid nor approval is worth the
cost to Moldova.



(c) 1999, Stratfor, Inc.
______________________________


**COPYRIGHT NOTICE** In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107,
any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use
without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving the included information for nonprofit research and educational
purposes only.[Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml ]

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to