I agree, Samantha. The Bill of Rights is the one thing in the way of their goals. They know they can't repeal those amendments so they must cover them over with "necessary for security" policies and legislation that will function as de facto repeal.
"Samantha L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-Cave
-Caveat Lector-
Dale,
You make a good point. My guess is that manipulating the US public into
giving up their civil liberties is a far more important goal in this stage of
the game than nationalism one way or another. They'll come up with some
scheme down the road to convince Americans it's
-Caveat Lector-
On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, Dale Stonehouse wrote:
>And yet, nationalism in the U.S.A. increased perhaps ten-fold as a
>result of the destruction and plane crashes. Were the planners stupid
>enough to think they would get an opposite reaction? If they are that
>stupid, are they still sma
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 9/16/01 11:07:17 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< the mandate being asked of the world is for america
to operate outside her borders- with the support of her "partners". >>
Yes, c. We learned how to do this from the British, and we learned it well.
BHoward
-Caveat Lector-
- Original Message -
From: "Dale Stonehouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2001 5:47 PM
Subject: [CTRL] Nationalism: Nemesis of NWO
>
> The goal of the New World Order is to unite the world u
The goal of the New World Order is to unite the world under one government and, some say, one religion.
According to some theorists, the events of last week were carefully planned and designed to facilitate implementation of the New World Order.
And yet, nationalism in the U.S.A. increased perhaps