-Caveat Lector-

"Axis of Evil" ... when I play this backward on my truntable it comes
out "Live fo' Sixa"; could this "Sixa" be Texas oilman talk for a
"six-pack"?  A<>E<>R

>From WND

}}}>Begin
This is a WorldNetDaily printer-friendly version of the article which
follows.
To view this item online, visit http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/
article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=26329



Tuesday, February 5, 2002







The War Party and
the 'Axis Of Evil'





By Patrick J. Buchanan



© 2002 Creators Syndicate, Inc.

With the exception of the War Party pundits who are orgasmic over Mr. Bush's threat to 
launch preventive wars against the "axis of evil" – Iran, Iraq and North Korea – 
volunteers for the Great Crusade seem notably absent.
 Nowhere – not even among the nations supposedly threatened – has there been a 
rallying to the colors.

The tepid, even negative, reaction to his war talk should tell Bush something: If 
America launches wars against Iraq, Iran and North Korea, she risks doing so alone, 
without allies.

The president's phrase, "axis of evil," of course, recalls both Ronald Reagan's 
depiction of the Soviet Empire of Leonid Brezhnev as an "evil empire" and the Axis 
powers of World War II: Nazi Germany, fascist Italy and im
perial Japan. Was Bush wrong in depicting the Iraqi, Iranian and North Korean regimes 
as evil?

Not at all. That each is evil in how it treats its people is undeniable. But so, too, 
is a Beijing evil that murders dissent and forces abortions on married women for the 
crime of having a second child. But if it would be
 unwise for Bush to call China an "evil empire whose leaders are the heirs of the 
greatest mass murderer of the 20th century," is it wise to so depict these three 
nations?

Is North Korea really Tojo's Japan? By 1941, Japan had occupied Korea and Taiwan for 
decades, seized Manchuria, invaded China, taken Indochina and was hovering over 
Singapore and the U.S. Philippines. North Korea is a her
mit kingdom wedged between China and Russia, and fronting a South Korea with twice its 
population and 30 times its economic power, backed up by the United States. Can anyone 
visualize North Korea rampaging across East Asi
a and the western Pacific?

Iraq and Iran, far from being united in an axis, lately fought a war in which a 
million men perished. Their detestation is mutual. Thus, rather than lending clarity 
to the dangerous world in which we live, Bush's rhetoric
 leads only to confusion.

Moreover, in 1941, the whole non-Axis world – from the Brits to the Bolsheviks to the 
occupied peoples of Europe and Asia – wanted America to intervene against the Axis. 
But Bush's threat to go to war has received zero su
pport overseas, while perplexing and dividing his coalition at home.

Bush has blundered in a way that will come back to haunt him, if he does not now 
follow up, as the War Party demands, and launch wars on one or all of the three 
regimes that constitute his "axis of evil." His speechwriter
s and foreign-policy team have pushed him out on a limb … from which he is already 
visibly trying to crawl back.

Rather than let the U.S. military success in Afghanistan speak for him, he has let the 
bellicose wordsmiths of the War Party do his talking. Big mistake. Bush now needs to 
do some serious thinking and to ask himself some
hard questions.

How can we risk war against North Korea without the support of the South, or without 
hundreds of thousands of U.S. troops? If he intends to use air power to destroy 
Pyongyang's weapons, is Bush prepared for a response tha
t would almost surely mean a horrendous barrage on the U.S. forces on the DMZ, and 
perhaps an invasion of the South? And if he is not prepared for such a war, why 
threaten it?

How does Bush propose to topple the mullahs in Iran? Would not a U.S. attack unify 
Iran, millions of whose people are pro-American and which lately voted by 70 percent 
to toss the mullahs out? Iran and Iraq may be moving
to acquire "weapons of mass destruction," but why would U.S. deterrence fail with 
them, when it succeeded with Stalin and Mao?

And if Seoul will not support a war on the North and none of the threatened Gulf 
nations supports a war on Iraq, why is this America's fight? If the threatened 
countries prefer jaw-jaw to war-war, why is this our quarrel?
 Why not get U.S. forces out of harm's way in both regions and let these nations work 
it all out themselves? Why get Americans killed for nations and regimes that do not 
even want us fighting their fight?

Perhaps Bush has concluded that if Iran, Iraq and North Korea acquire atomic weapons, 
they will use them in a suicidal strike on us, and that, therefore, destroying these 
regimes – even if it means major American casualti
es – is necessary to our security. But if so, the president has not made this case to 
his country.

Let him make the case for war to the country and to a Congress that alone has the 
power to authorize him to go to war. But let us not blunder into war simply because 
the White House, in the hubris of victory, got carried
away on the wings of its own oratory.



Related offer:

Buchanan's latest book is here!
"The Death of the West" is an eye-opening exposé of how immigration
invasions are endangering America. Both autographed and unautographed
copies are now available at WorldNetDaily's online store!



Patrick J. Buchanan was twice a candidate for the Republican
presidential nomination and the Reform Party’s candidate in 2000. Now
a commentator and columnist, he served three presidents in the White
House, was a founding panelist of three national television shows,
and is the author of seven books.
End<{{{
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking
new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe
simply because it has been handed down for many generations. Do not
believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do
not believe in anything simply because it is written in Holy Scriptures. Do not
believe in anything merely on the authority of Teachers, elders or wise men.
Believe only after careful observation and analysis, when you find that it
agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all.
Then accept it and live up to it."
The Buddha on Belief, from the Kalama Sutta
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
A merely fallen enemy may rise again, but the reconciled
one is truly vanquished. -Johann Christoph Schiller,
                                     German Writer (1759-1805)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
It is preoccupation with possessions, more than anything else, that
prevents us from living freely and nobly. -Bertrand Russell
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Everyone has the right...to seek, receive and impart
information and ideas through any media and regardless
of frontiers."
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will
teach you to keep your mouth shut."
--- Ernest Hemingway

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to