See: http://www.exopolitics.com

With any luck this could be the point where the tide
turns toward the abolition of weapons of mass
destruction to a more peaceful use of space.


1)      Star Wars Test Failure
2)      Text of scientists' anti-missile letter

The following is an excerpted statement by Lieutenant
General Ronald Kadish, Director, BMDO at the
Pentagon's press briefing on Saturday, July 8, 2000 -
1:37 a.m. EDT:

"..We launched the interceptor. But we failed to have
the kill vehicle separate from the booster second
stage. All we know based on telemetry now, and of
course we will get more data as time goes on, is that
the kill vehicle was waiting for a signal that we had
second stage separation. We did not receive that
signal. Therefore, the timeline shut down and the kill
vehicle did not separate, and therefore, we did not
attempt or have any activity in the intercept phase.
So we had a failure of the booster kill vehicle
separation.."

        * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

        Are the Gremlins at Work
        or Is It the Nature of the Beast?

With any luck this could be the point where the tide
turns toward the abolition of weapons of mass
destruction to a more peaceful use of space.

        * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

"Antimissile System Fails Over Pacific, Pentagon
Reports"
New York Times Online article By ELAINE SCIOLINO
http://www.nytimes.com/library/world/global/070800missile-test.html

*******************************************************

2.    Text of scientists' anti-missile letter

The full text of the letter from the Federation of
American Scientists to President Clinton urging that
the National Missile Defence system be abandoned
http://www.news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/monitoring/media_reports/newsid_823
000/823196.stm


Dear Mr President:

We urge you not to make the decision to deploy an
anti-ballistic missile system during the remaining
months of
your administration.

The system would offer little protection and would do
grave harm to this nation's core security interests.

We and other independent scientists have long argued
that anti-ballistic missile systems, particularly
those
attempting to intercept re-entry vehicles in space,
will inevitably lose in an arms race of improvements
to offensive missiles.

North Korea has taken dramatic steps toward
reconciliation with South Korea. Other dangerous
states will arise. But what would such a state gain by
attacking the United States except its own
destruction?

While the benefits of the proposed anti-ballistic
missile system are dubious, the dangers created by a
decision to deploy are clear.

Arms race

It would be difficult to persuade Russia or China that
the United States is wasting tens of billions of
dollars on an ineffective missile system against small
states that are unlikely to launch a missile attack on
the US.

The Russians and Chinese must therefore conclude that
the presently planned system is a stage in developing
a
bigger system directed against them.

They may respond by restarting an arms race in
ballistic missiles and having missiles in a dangerous
"launch-on-warning" mode.

Even if the next planned test of the proposed
anti-ballistic missile system works as planned, any
movement toward deployment would be premature,
wasteful and dangerous.

Respectfully,

Dr Hans Bethe

On behalf of the Federation of American Scientists
July 8, 2000
Post Cassini Flyby News
        Editor - Jonathan Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        P.O. Box 1999 Wendell Depot, MA 01380 USA

        July 8, 2000

_________
earthradioTV.com - Alternative News Portal for ecology, politics &
consciousness.           mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
earthradioTV.com MIRROR SITES:
USA     http://www.earthradioTV.com/index2.html
CZECH   http://mujweb.cz/www/ecologynews/
UK      http://members.tripod.co.uk/ecologynews/
Canada http://www.ecologynews.com/index2.html

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to