FYI, see study at http://www.mrc.org/specialreports/news/sr20000523b.html

.......We would like to think that the Cold War is over. But for the people
of communist Cuba and the people who've fled it, the Cold War remains. In
all of the coverage and controversy over the arrival and seizure of
six-year-old Elian Gonzalez, the media have taken the stark contrast between
American liberty and Cuban tyranny and muddled it to the point that much of
the American public thinks Cuba is no different than America, or worse, that
Cuba is better than America. The Media Research Center has compiled a record
showing how the national media built the public-relations rationale for
Elian's eventual return to Cuba, and then justified the government raid on a
private residence to insure a political victory for the Clinton
administration and the communist regime of Cuba. Is it any wonder that the
public told network pollsters that they approved of the seizure of Elian
after being barraged with liberal arguments? Analysts identified four
patterns of distinct liberal media bias:

1. The news media have deliberately undermined the moral legitimacy of Elian
's Miami relatives specifically and anti-communist Cuban-Americans in
general.

2. The news media have consistently praised the actions and "achievements"
of Fidel Castro's Cuba, claimed it was better for children than America, and
played up the paradise Elian could dwell in among the Communist Party elite.

3. The news media have justified Attorney General Janet Reno's actions and
arguments, and lamented any resistance or delay in returning Elian to Cuba.

4. The news media have dismissed congressional criticism of the INS raid and
calls for investigation as unpopular and unnecessary.

If the media were interested in a balanced presentation of the Elian
controversy, they would have scrutinized the administration more than
justified it; they would have explained the regimented reality of family
life in Cuba; they would have balanced their questioning of the motivations
of Elian's Miami relatives by questioning the motives of the reunification
camp; and they would have encouraged more discussion and oversight instead
of trying to cut it off.

Entire Study Available At
http://www.mrc.org/specialreports/news/sr20000523b.html


-A

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
<A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to