-Caveat Lector-

WJPBR Email News List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peace at any cost is a Prelude to War!

Silenced: Flight 800 and the subversion of justice, part 4

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--


Altered evidence

Indeed, a book could – and ought to be – written on the myriad details in
this investigation that raise alarms. In fact, no single bit of evidence says
"mechanical." Even the evidence at the very heart of the NTSB thesis – "the
inescapable conclusion that the cause [of the crash] was a fuel-air break up
in center wing tank that involved the explosion of the center wing tank" –
argues against that thesis.

Despite its name, the center wing tank sits in the fuselage under the
passenger seats. No one denies it blew up. The only questions are when and
how.

Cmdr. Donaldson argues that the fuel could have blown only if the center wing
tank were seriously disturbed by some external event. He has performed some
simple but telling experiments on this point. In the one, Donaldson dips a
lit match into a tin of Jet A Fuel. The fuel extinguishes the match. As he
notes, the Aviation Fuels Handbook says the same phenomenon will occur up to
127 degrees Fahrenheit with this fuel.

When, however, Donaldson sprays a candle flame with Jet A Fuel, the spray
erupts wildly into flame. This results, says Donaldson, "If something violent
happens and the fuel is misted into the atmosphere by kinetic energy."

In fact, in its own tests, the NTSB could not get any kind of explosion from
the Jet A fuel that they could use for analysis. So they had to test with
hotter fuels. Nor could the NTSB identify the spark that would ignite the
fuel especially since there is no wiring in the center fuel tank. Consider
this damning conclusion by an honest NTSB investigator at the final NTSB
hearing:


The search for the probable ignition location was pushed to the limits of
current technology. An accounting of the scientific uncertainties was
meticulously maintained throughout the entire experimental, computational and
analytic processes. In the end the uncertainties were too great to locate
probable location of ignition.


Comments Jim Sanders a bit more succinctly, "They spent 40 million trying to
find some scientist, somewhere in America to say this hypothesis would work.
They couldn't find one."

The IAMAW couldn't find anything either. In its final report, the machinists
union declares, "We conclude that the existing wiring recovered from flight
800 wreckage does not exhibit any evidence of improper maintenance or any
malfunction that lead to a spark or other discrepancy."

So why did the fuel tank blow up? The IAMAW came to its own conclusions: "A
high pressure event breached the fuselage and the fuselage unzipped due to
the event. The explosion was a result of this event."

A "high pressure event" is a technical way of suggesting an external force,
like a missile. Not surprisingly, the NTSB quietly suppressed the IAMAW
report.

Despite all the evidence to the contrary, the NTSB persisted at the final
hearing in its argument that there was no "physical evidence" of a bomb or
missile. NTSB staffers could do this with a straight face only because the
reconstructed plane showed no apparent sign of missile damage, even though
only 95 percent of the plane was alleged to be recovered and there were
gaping holes in the sides of the plane.

Something to remember here. The top NTSB brass was pushing a mechanical
thesis before much of anything was recovered. Indeed, it seems altogether
possible that in an administration notorious for misplacing evidence – the
McVeigh case only the most recent – the physical evidence from Flight 800 was
"misplaced" as well.

In a telling and amusing bit of ABC news footage, a man, who appears to be an
NYPD bomb expert, looks closely at a recovered part of the plane and says, "I
wish Clinton would get off his ass and do something about this terrorism." He
then comments to the FBI agent next to him that the part before him bore
obvious signs of an explosion. The agent leans in and quiets him. Sometime
before the final NTSB hearing this part apparently disappeared.

The NTSB, you see, could never "find" any physical evidence. That was their
Clintonian escape hatch, "find." During the Sanders' trial, a senior FBI
official, Ken Maxwell, under oath in court stated that the NTSB was not
allowed to see any evidence as it came off the ship, onto shore, or into the
hangar, it remained under FBI control during the entire process. The FBI
would go through it at will, taking anything that it wanted. This was stated
under oath as well.

Under oath, too, senior NTSB official Hank Hughes told a Senate committee
that FBI agents were caught in an internal sting at 3 a.m. removing Flight
800 evidence from a hangar Hughes controlled.

Commander Donaldson's allies within the investigation were telling him much
the same thing. In one specific case, a Donaldson source had a suspiciously
damaged part tested for explosives. It turned up positive. "The FBI alerts on
it," claims Donaldson, "and the next thing you know the part is gone."

As part of the discovery process for his criminal trial, Sanders was allowed
access to information and places others were not. He took many photos. One
significant series of photos Sanders obtained shows what the inner portion of
the center wing tank looked like when it came into the hangar. The part was
swept dramatically upwards, indicating an external force coming into the
airplane blowing it up and in.

In the video, we superimposed this part on the reconstructed plane. It
reveals the path a missile warhead blast would have made through the right
side of the center wing tank and out through a charred, gaping hole in the
fuselage above. It is frightening to behold.

This, the NTSB could not live with. Later photos suggest that the upward
bending metal from this huge piece was cut off and mashed down, the way a
spontaneous explosion of the center wing tank might have pushed it. At the
final NTSB hearing, a video showed an NTSB official standing on this very
part, pointing up toward an imperceptible scrape, declaring it to be
compelling evidence of a mechanical failure unprecedented in its magnitude.

And by this time, only the reckless would dare challenge him.

Unspoken truth

Let me present a likely scenario.

Within hours of the crash, for reasons unknown, a decision is made at or near
the top to contain any reports of a missile strike. To assure cooperation,
participants are told that it is a matter of highest national security.
Whether the missile strike is a tragic misfire by Navy or NATO forces or an
act of terrorism is no longer relevant. What is relevant is that some
individuals know what happened and decide to conceal the truth.

Once made, this decision cannot be taken back, not in this White House – not
in the months and days before a presidential election. As the conspirators
begin to realize that the media will not challenge them, they decide in
small, awkward steps to tailor the evidence to fit the safest political
outcome, a mechanical failure. The great majority of workers are fully in the
dark. A small percentage, including much of the NTSB brass, remains willfully
blind. Only a handful sees what is happening.

But a spontaneous explosion of this type and violence has never happened
before, ever, and did not happen on July 17. What did happen? Here is a
solid, fact-based estimate.

Yes, TWA Flight 800 does take off from JFK at 8:19 p.m. and head east along
the Long Island shore. About 12 minutes later a boater sees a missile rise up
off the horizon and loses it behind a beach house.

Mike Wire, a few hundred yards to the East on Beach Lane Bridge, picks the
missile up as it rises vertically above that house and watches it head south
away from shore, now zigzagging as it tries to acquire its target.

Lisa Perry and Paul Angelides pick up this same missile now high in the sky.
So does Air National Guard pilot Major Fritz Meyers.

Meanwhile Dwight Brumley, a senior Navy NCO on board USAir Flight 217,
watches a second missile rise up towards his plane, arc over and head to the
north.

An unidentified ship now boldly flees the scene, perhaps having launched that
very missile. Angelides sees the ship. From a school parking lot on Long
Island, Witness 649 sees Brumley's northbound missile streak up vertically
and then start zigzagging in pursuit of its target.

Lisa Perry who has followed the southbound missile to Flight 800 now sees the
northbound missile.

Says Perry, "The other one comes up from underneath the bottom of the plane
and it's in the shadow the plane and I think it's going to thread it like
right through the middle of the head of the plane, thread it like a needle."

At 8:31 p.m. the southbound missile explodes in a white phosphorescent light
a few feet from Flight 800, nicks the left wing and blasts into the underside
of the nose, blowing it 15 degrees to the right and thrusting debris more
than a mile in the same direction.

Nine-tenths of a second later, the northbound missile corrects direction at
the last second, explodes, and the blast slams up into the belly of the
plane, ripping through the center wing tank and transforming the liquid fuel
into a volatile mist. Now noseless, the plane pitches backward, and the fuel
erupts in flame.

>From his helicopter, Major Fritz Meyer sees exactly what witness 649 so
graphically described: "The first two (explosions) appeared to be high
velocity. The last one was a low velocity petro-chemical explosion which grew
into a huge fireball."

There is no 3000-foot ascent to deceive the witnesses, nothing like it. TWA
Flight 800 immediately begins its slow, oddly graceful descent into the sea,
breaking up as it descends, transforming itself in those sad final seconds
from a horror into a tragedy, a tragedy that will soon resonate in a thousand
scenes of intense personal sorrow throughout the world.

"The main thing that hit me then was anger," says Marge Gross whose brother
was killed on the flight, "anger and a promise." I said "Who did this to you?
I would find out who did this to him."

Five years later, Gross lives her promise. It has not been easy – not for
her, not for the resolute eyewitnesses, not for the persecuted Sanders, not
for the stalwart and now seriously ill Cmdr. Donaldson. These gallant souls
have explored our dark places for us and, to this point, the only light they
have seen is the light they themselves have generated.




*COPYRIGHT NOTICE** In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107,
any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use
without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving the included information for nonprofit research and educational
purposes only.[Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml ]

Want to be on our lists?  Write at [EMAIL PROTECTED] for a menu of our lists!

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to