-Caveat Lector-

Date sent:              Sun, 13 Jun 1999 00:17:58 -0700
From:                   Mitch Battros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:                     Breaking News <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject:                Earth Changes TV/Breaking News - NASA/SOHO Official
Response


Official Response From Joseph B. Gurman, NASA/SOHO Project Scientist,
Unreported CME...06/12/99
by Mitch Battros (ECTV)

Thanks to one of our viewers after a call to help with the
investigation, we now have an official response from NASA. A
special thanks goes to Father Richard Gant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for this
incredible bit of investigation. Father Gant has a web
site as well    http://www.solt3.org . Thank you for your efforts.

Mr. Gurman states the failure to monitor the CME was do to a "detector
was being baked out" and "the reformatting of
software". This occurred during an American Astronomical  Society
meeting in Chicago on June 1st, at which the BCC was covering. It was
well attended by physicists, scientist and astronomers. For a moment,
when viewing the monitors at the convention they thought they had a
"real planet buster" of a CME. After further determination, the
scientist realized it was heading away from earth. (What a picture for
Warner Brothers, I can see the move now).

Mr. Gurman went on to state "If I had to guess" regarding the omission
of this date, June 1st, " the LASCO folks (had) no one in over the
Memorial Day weekend, and somebody's "automatic" software broke."

Below is the original email :  You know, it sounds like something that
could have happened to me at my University during
a dissertation. Quite the story.

From:  SMTP%"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
To:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: Earth Changes TV - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj:  [Fwd: Earth Changes TV/Breaking News - Did NASA Erase It's
Tracks?]

"Joseph B. Gurman" wrote:

Sometimes I wish NASA could be clever enough to stage a coverup, but as
far as I can tell, we're not capable of such an
effort: after all, when one starts to lie, one has to remember what lie
who told whom, and when. Beyond us.

Here is my understanding of this "event" and how it got to be a BBC news
story. At the Centennial meeting of the American
Astronomical Society (AAS) in Chicago last week --- a meeting very well
attended by solar physicists, since the Society was
founded by George Ellery Hale, the pioneer solar physicist --- we
(actually, ESA  paid for most of it) had a Solar and
Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO) booth in the exhibition area. In
addition to "canned" videos of past SOHO observations
and science presentations, the booth included two PC's connected to the
Internet; the PC's were provided by the group
at the Naval Research Laboratory who operate the LASCO coronagraphs on
SOHO. LASCO and the Extreme ultraviolet
Imaging Telescope (EIT) share electronics, so the NRL people as well as
we (the EIT team) both reformat the EIT data and
make movies of them.

The PC's from NRL were designed to grab movies of the most recent 24
hours or so of images from LASCO C2, LASCO
C3, and EIT from machines at the SOHO Experimenters' Operations Facility
(EOF) here at NASA Goddard Space Flight
Center in Greenbelt Maryland, via the Internet, and display them for the
folks attending the AAS meeting exhibitions.

There were two problems with this:

1. The EIT CCD detector was being baked out over the Memorial Day
weekend to improve its performance (see:
http://umbra.nascom.nasa.gov/eit/CCD_bakeout.html  for more on CCD
detectors and why the EIT one needs to be baked
out occasionally)

2. The reformatting software --- that turns the raw telemetry into
viewable images --- on the LASCO workstations in the
EOF had broken down over the holiday weekend, when noone came in to
check on it. (Most of the people who usually did
so were in Chicago, and the one other fellow was on his boat on
Chesapeake Bay.)

So, we didn't have very current movies of LASCO images for the first day
and a half of the meeting (May 32 - June 1), and
then when the data started flowing again, we saw the great, bright halo
coronal mass ejection (CME). Unfortunately, what
one needs to determine whether the "halo" CME is headed towards or away
from the earth --- they look the same in
white-light coronagraph images because the scattering geometry is
identical --- is by looking at what happens (or doesn't
happen) in the lower corona: i.e., in EIT images.... and we weren't
getting any EIT images (aside from "darks" taken with the
shutter closed, or calibration images taken with a visible-light lamp
flooding the CCD, to calibrate it after the bakeout. This is
a standard procedure every time we do a bakeout.

So the situation in Chicago was that we had a great-looking halo CME, a
substantial number of eager journalists, and no EIT
images with which to determine whether the CME was directed or directed
toward or away from the earth. The BBC
journalist evidently decide he (or she) knew the answer when the SOHO
scientists at the AAS meeting were still scratching
their heads. The fact that there'd been a press conference the previous
morning on the precipitous rise of the new solar
activity cycle probably piqued the reporter's interest. And the comment
attributed to one solar physicist (my Lab head!) that
a CME this big was a "real planet buster" might have been too much for
an enterprising newman.woman to resist.

Now, why was there a gap in the:

 http://www.spaceweather.com/java/solar-anim.html  animation? I honestly
don't know. You should know, however, that
www.spaceweather.com is a bit of a rogue operation. First, it's got a
.com Internet domain name, which means they can say
anything they want without having to be responsible to anyone at NASA
(or the taxpayers who pay us). On the other hand,
the site is probably a good thing if NASA ever did decide to try to
"cover up" something of general interest, for precisely the
same reason. I do know the Public Affairs folks at NASA HQ have real
heartburn over the ways in which the folks at that
Web site appear to steal credit for scientific work in which they were
not involved. (Frankly, it doesn't bother me all that
much, because it's the science that the taxpayers are paying for that's
the important story, not who did it or where.)

If I had to guess --- and this is complete speculation --- as to why
their site hadn't updated images during the days in
question, I  would ascribe it to the same gotcha as bit the LASCO folks:
no one was in over the Memorial Day weekend, and
somebody's "automatic" software broke.

So there's a few facts and an idle speculation, for what they're
worth.       My $0.02,


Joe Gurman
U.S. project scientist for SOHO
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Mitch Battros
Producer - Earth Changes TV
Web Site:
http://www.earthchangesTV.com

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to