-Caveat Lector-
Burning Questions
Branch Davidian Survivors' Suit May Resolve
Concerns Over Feds' Conduct
by JOHN COUNCIL
Texas Lawyer/TexLaw
July 26, 1999
For six years, hundreds of containers of evidence relating to
the federal government's raid on the Branch Davidian compound
have sat in an Austin storage room, protected by the Texas
Department of Public Safety and rarely seeing the light of day.
Requests from the public and the media for access to that
evidence - which includes videotapes, photographs and audiotapes
that may paint an unflattering picture of the government's
conduct during the 1993 raid near Waco - have typically been met
by confounding replies from federal and state officials.
"The DPS says, 'We have it, but we don't control it.' The DOJ
[U.S. Department of Justice] says, 'We don't have it. Ask DPS,'
" says Michael A. Caddell, a Houston lawyer who's suing the
federal government on behalf of the Branch Davidians' surviving
family members. "It's like chasing your tail. It's the kind of
games playing that makes people not trust the government."
But all of that soon may change. Caddell's civil suit is proceeding thanks to a July 1
order issued by U.S. District Judge Walter S. Smith Jr. of Waco. Caddell hopes the
suit and the discovery it produces will clear the s
moke around what happened on April 19, 1993, the day the compound burned to the ground
killing 73 people inside (18 other people died from gunshot wounds) after a 51-day
standoff.
Caddell believes the government may be responsible for some or all of those deaths,
and believes some of the evidence will show that agents shot into the compound on that
final day and used pyrotechnics that caused the co
mpound to burn. The government denies those allegations, and in motions to dismiss the
case, DOJ lawyers assert that sovereign immunity protects the government from such
tort claims. The government has long maintained tha
t the Branch Davidians set fire to the compound.
Many of the civil suits filed against the defendants were consolidated in 1996 to be
tried before Smith. In motions, the government defendants asked Smith to dismiss the
suit. Smith dismissed all of the claims against the
individual defendants (except those against Lon Horiuchi, an FBI sniper accused of
firing into the compound), but he allowed some of the controversial claims against the
ATF and FBI to go forward.
"If one or more ATF agents shot into the compound indiscriminately and without
provocation, such would be the type of behavior that could lead to liability," Smith
wrote in his order. "There is insufficient evidence at th
is point for the court to determine, as a matter of law, how the fire was started in
the compound (although there is nothing to support plaintiffs' claim that the
government started the fire intentionally)."
"If it is determined that some of the Davidians actually started the fire in the case,
the United States would not be liable for failing to protect the remaining Davidians,"
Smith continued. "Likewise, there would be no l
iability based upon the Government's failure to end the stand-off successfully."
A DOJ spokesman says the government has not decided how to proceed with the case or
whether to appeal Smith's order.
"We're still in just the reviewing stage," says Myron Marlin, who suggests that the
DOJ prevailed in Smith's order. "We got something like 100 claims thrown out," he says.
Some of those discarded claims included RICO actions against the government. Marlin
declines to comment on specific questions about the suit because it is pending.
But Caddell says Smith's ruling leaves the main issues in the suit intact.
"Smith has ruled that we can go to trial on, [what] is for me, what the lawsuit is all
about."
Shots Fired
Caddell's discovery process may actually be aided by independent chroniclers of the
Branch Davidian raid who have doggedly pursued evidence about the stand-off for years.
Or, at least, those people may give Caddell a glim
pse of what he's in for.
One of them is David T. Hardy, an Arizona lawyer who has been trying to pry the
evidence loose for a book he intends to write. Hardy filed suit against the FBI and
the ATF after they dragged their feet on releasing eviden
ce, including infrared tapes shot by federal agents. Some independent investigators
claim those tapes show agents shooting at the compound on the day it burned.
On July 6, Senior U.S. District Judge Alfredo C. Marquez of Arizona awarded Hardy
$32,000 in attorneys' fees for his three-year quest to get information from the
government.
"The court's decision to award attorney fees tips in favor of the plaintiff because of
the unreasonableness of defendant's excuses for withholding information," Marquez
wrote. "The FBI's conduct was far superior to that o
f the ATF, but in this court's opinion FBI stonewalled the release of the most
controversial of plaintiff's requests: the FLIR (infrared) tapes."
Hardy expects that the civil lawyers will be more successful during discovery than he
was with his Freedom of Information Act requests.
"The guys handling the litigation may get a ton of stuff," Hardy says. "The discovery
potential is unbelievable."
Interestingly, much of that evidence may end up under Smith's control during
discovery, and not the government's. The Texas Office of the Attorney General filed a
motion July 9 with Smith's court asking to be relieved of
the duties of caring for the records and handling requests to see them.
"The Department of Justice has requested that it receive all requests from the public
for access to evidence," wrote Texas Assistant Attorney General Daniel E. Maeso in the
motion. "It has responded to such requests by as
serting its lack of possession of the evidence and, ultimately, referring the same
requests back to the DPS." DOJ lawyers in Washington did not return two phone calls.
Maeso has also asked for the evidence to be kept under seal and under the court's
control. Smith has not yet ruled on the motion.
If Smith grants the motion and keeps the evidence, it could hurt the government, says
Michael McNulty, a Fort Collins investigative reporter who served as researcher and
producer for the 1997 independent documentary film,
"Waco: The Rules of Engagement," which was nominated for an Academy Award.
"Instead of being the guardian of the evidence, they have to go ask for it. It's
definitely added a new twist to the case," McNulty says. "They won't have the
masterful control of the evidence that they might have had. If
you have control of the evidence, you have control of the case."
McNulty says he obtained copies of the infrared tapes from lawyers who got the
evidence through discovery in defending the surviving Branch Davidians during their
criminal trials. His film examined the infrared tapes and
suggested that government agents fired into the compound on the final day of the siege
and that devices they placed in the compound contributed to the fire.
McNulty filed a declaration last month with Smith's court stating that he recently
examined evidence in the DPS storage facility under the supervision of an assistant
U.S. attorney while working on a new film project. He
claims he found evidence including: photographs that show government personnel pouring
bleach over bullets in order to destroy hair fibers and tissue; a videotape of a
helicopter directing gunfire into the compound; and "
flashbang and other pyrotechnic munitions recovered by the Texas Rangers from inside
and around Mt. Carmel, including some recovered at or near the alleged points of
origin of the April 19, 1993 fire."
Bill Johnston, a Waco assistant U.S. attorney, says he accompanied McNulty on a
supervised visit of the evidence storage room, and that subsequent visits by the
investigator were supervised by the Texas Rangers.
"Throughout this case, the government has suffered because of a perception of not
being open and a perception of not being accountable. That lends itself to other bad
feelings," Johnston says. "Because of that, I felt tha
t we should lean toward giving some access."
Dan Cogdell, who represented surviving Branch Davidian Clive Doyle during his criminal
trial, doesn't remember tapes being handed over to McNulty. But he does remember the
tough time he had examining government surveillan
ce tapes he was given during discovery.
"We got literally weeks worth of surveillance a few days before cross-examination.
It's an impossible task," Cogdell says. "You can scream all day, but it's very tough
to get a case reversed based on a discovery claim."
Eleven surviving Branch Davidians were tried in federal court for murder in connection
with the deaths of four ATF agents killed during the raid. All were acquitted of
murder but four were found guilty of the lesser-inclu
ded offense of voluntary manslaughter.
Cogdell says he has no doubt that plaintiffs lawyers with civil suits will have a much
easier time with discovery than he did.
"It's just one of the many ironies," Cogdell says. "Your monetary rights far exceed
your civil liberties."
<Picture: Michael Caddell>
Attorney Michael A. Caddell accuses the government of playing games with the evidence.
Law News Network | Cal Law | Daily Report Online | Illinois Law
New York Law Journal | PaLAWnet
TexLaw Home
Copyright (c) 1999, Texas Lawyer. All rights reserved.
>From www.texlaw.com/today/waco723.htm
A<>E<>R
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking
new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said
it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your
own reason and your common sense." --Buddha
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
A merely fallen enemy may rise again, but the reconciled
one is truly vanquished. -Johann Christoph Schiller,
German Writer (1759-1805)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
It is preoccupation with possessions, more than anything else, that
prevents us from living freely and nobly. -Bertrand Russell
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Everyone has the right...to seek, receive and impart
information and ideas through any media and regardless
of frontiers."
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will
teach you to keep your mouth shut."
--- Ernest Hemingway
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
