-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 12/29/98 4:57:52 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< So true, so true. Whether it turns out to be a bona fide catastrophe or
merely
a pretext for martial law, I think we need to start converting our anxieties
about it into action, and use
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 12/28/98 4:38:46 PM, you wrote:
>This is the whole problem with this topic. One does not know what to
believe.
>That is the whole point anyway.
So true, so true. Whether it turns out to be a bona fide catastrophe or merely
a pretext for martial law, I think
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 12/28/98 11:38:36 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
>
> This is the whole problem with this topic. One does not know what to
> believe.
> That is the whole point anyway. It seems to me that what can be
> accomplished
> with the "use" of
-Caveat Lector-
This is the whole problem with this topic. One does not know what to believe.
That is the whole point anyway. It seems to me that what can be accomplished
with the "use" of such a thing is great. Consider the "apocalyptic"
maundering of the "fundies", as you say. Then conside
-Caveat Lector-
> Why do I have such a hard time finding a computer programmer that I know
> that's even mildly concerned w/ Y2K? I've asked all my programmer friends
> the following questions: 1) Are you the least bit worried about Y2K, and 2)
> Are any of your colleagues worried about Y2K? T
-Caveat Lector-
>Other electronic equipment besides computers may also be vulnerable. So
>engineers everywhere are clambering over pipes, behind walls and into
>closets in a giant scavenger hunt for computer chips that control
>factories, oil platforms, aircraft, traffic lights and building-secu
