In a message dated 00-06-27 22:17:21 EDT, you write:

<<
     Full content for this article includes illustration and other.

    Source:  USA Today (Magazine), March 1995 v123 n2598 p92(2).

     Title:  Those who seek execution: capital punishment as a form of
suicide.
    Author:  Katherine Van Wormer

  Abstract:  Some criminals are filled with self hatred and commit capital
 crimes as a form of suicide because they want to die. States where the death
 penalty is legal may put innocent citizens at risk by attracting suicidal
 killers.

  Subjects:  Capital punishment - Psychological aspects
             Suicide - Psychological aspects
             Criminal behavior - Psychological aspects

   Magazine Collection:  78B0557
 Electronic Collection:  A16805726
                    RN:  A16805726


 Full Text COPYRIGHT Society for the Advancement of Education 1995

 CRIME continues to lead in polls that gauge prioritizing of the most serious
 issues facing the U.S. An outcry for harsher punishment, including the death
 penalty, is reflected in legislation at the state and Federal levels.
 Politicians' platforms calling for the death penalty echo the public rage
 against the violent criminal.

 What is the impact of the death penalty on the homicide rate? Can
 victimization be prevented by letting the public know that killers will face
 death themselves? To address these questions, it is imperative to understand
 what goes on in the minds of some killers, especially those who attack not
out
 of passion, but in cold blood, often claiming multiple victims.

 Public execution has been an established means of punishment since the
 founding of America. From 1967 to 1977, however, use of the death penalty
 ceased, partly due to Supreme Court decisions that the penalty, as then
 applied, was unconstitutional. In 1976, as states revised their guidelines
for
 execution, the practice was resumed. In 1977, Gary Gilmore was the first
 person in a decade to be executed. He had killed strangers ruthlessly--a
crime
 which, on the surface, made no sense.

 Upon examining the life of Gilmore, a key theme that emerges is the
 self-hatred and utter self-contempt of a man apparently bent on his own
 destruction. Criminologist G. Richard Strafer and author Norman Mailer each
 have singled out Gilmore as the prototype of one who plotted his own dramatic
 end. After being paroled from Marion Federal Penitentiary, he (consciously or
 unconsciously) was attracted to Utah, where execution was by firing squad,
 rather than his home in Oregon, then a non-death penalty jurisdiction. After
 fighting his attorney for the right to be killed and receiving extensive
 public attention, Gilmore managed to be immortalized in death as he could not
 be in life.

 The implications of Gilmore's actions are staggering. Innocent persons were
 gunned down at a gas station, it seems, so a criminal could have himself
 executed. Utah's death penalty therefore may have attracted, rather than
 repelled, crime, at least in this case. Are there others? Sociologist
Thorsten
 Sellin, author of Capital Punishment, reports on an unnamed prisoner at
 Leavenworth who committed murder in order to exchange his life sentence for a
 death sentence. Numerous psychiatric reports attest to the phenomenon.
 Psychiatrist George Solomon in 1975 wrote about two cases involving capital
 punishment used as suicide. In the first, a Vietnam veteran, hardened to
 killing, chose to end it all by engaging in murder for hire. He knew that, in
 his state, the death penalty was mandatory for murder-for-hire killings. He
 told his sister, "I'm too much of a coward to commit suicide." The inability
 to take one's own life is a theme seen throughout such suicidal killings.

 In Solomon's second case, a 20-year-old baby-sitter suffocated two children.
 In her words: "I killed my girls; I killed two pieces of me. They were like
my
 sisters and I miss them so much.... I had to kill them. ... Yeah, they would
 kill me in the electric chair probably. I remember somebody telling me they
 were trying to get rid of capital punishment, and like I asked the sergeant
if
 like they still had capital punishment and he said yes, so I was pretty happy
 about it."

 Both parties described by Solomon thought about being executed prior to
 committing their acts. In each case, the state gave them prison terms instead
 of killing them.

 In 1959, at the California governor's request, psychiatrist Bernard Diamond
 examined a man immediately before his execution. The convict confessed to
 Diamond that he had committed three rape-murders and had attempted a fourth.
 His mission was suicide. When asked what he would have done had California
not
 had a death penalty, he replied, "I would have had to go to another state
 where they did have capital punishment and do it there." Diamond concluded
 from this case and his confirmation from other forensic psychiatrists that
the
 threat of the death penalty can act as an instigation to crime, rather than a
 deterrent.

 Capital punishment, with its dramatic rituals and ceremonies (even today,
when
 executions no longer are public), is the perfect fantasized death, a
glorified
 crucifixion, for certain sick minds, according to Diamond. The perpetrator of
 the crime is not afraid of death. What he or she fears is life.

 These observations are confirmed in the work of psychiatrist Louis J. West,
 who described the case of a Texas farmer, "tired of living," who shot and
 killed a total stranger in a cafe. West also mentioned the case of an already
 convicted Oklahoma murderer, Howard Otis Lowery, who killed a second time in
 order to make sure he would get the electric chair.

 On the basis of these cases, West speculated that the prospect of execution
is
 extremely attractive to some individuals who crave a violent means of
 committing suicide. West even cited the case of a person who confessed to a
 murder done by another so he could get himself put to death in this manner.
 West further speculated that death penalty states have higher homicide rates
 than non-death penalty states because of the attractiveness of the prospect
of
 execution to certain sick minds.

 The mass slaughter of eight nurses by Richard Speck in Illinois was included
 by West as a possible example of a psychopath's attraction to death penalty
 crimes in a death penalty state. This was supported by the fact that Speck
 previously had moved from Michigan, which did not have capital punishment.
 West's "guess" has not been confirmed by other evidence.

 In 1980, in Warren County, Ky., I interviewed Sherril Harston, who faced the
 death penalty. Harston had killed his lover and her three-year-old child.
 Ironically, both the defendant and the prosecutor were pleading for the
 maximum penalty. Harston tried again and again to fire his attorney, who was
 trying to save the defendant's life.

 While in jail, Harston composed a song that expressed his sentiments: "Now my
 life is doomed to be / Face to face with the magistrate-- / For my final
 destiny, / For all eternity,/ The Electrical Hanging Tree." When given a life
 sentence instead, he successfully fired his attorney and filed an appeal for
a
 new trial. In prison, he threatened to kill again if he did not get his way.

 Although Harston never did get his wish and refrained from further
 murder-today, he is working toward a college degree-his case is reminiscent
of
 the earlier case of James French, who was more successful in achieving his
 ends. In 1958, French was convicted of murdering a motorist. He testified at
 his trial that he hoped to be executed, but his pleas for the death penalty
 were to no avail. Sentenced to life in prison, he strangled his cellmate and,
 when tried on the new murder charge, reiterated his desire to be
electrocuted.
 The state executed him in 1966. French admitted that he always had "chickened
 out" at the last minute on several suicide attempts.

 Sometimes, the urge to be killed may be so strong that the convict may turn
on
 the jury. In 1980, rape-murderer Steven Judy threatened his jury with: "You
 had better put me to death, because next time it might be one of you or your
 daughter."

 In 1992, the Louisville Courier-Journal quoted an interview with a
17-year-old
 Indiana prisoner. The youth told police and others that, when he was 15, he
 wanted to die, but was afraid to commit suicide, so he killed his friend,
 thinking the state would execute him. The state declined to do so.

 Days before Lloyd Wayne Hampton was to die by lethal injection in Illinois,
he
 spoke bluntly about the fact that he had murdered in 1990 in order to get the
 death penalty. In a telephone interview with a Courier-Journal reporter,
 Hampton stated: "I either had to put myself in a position of being killed by
 somebody else or committing suicide. [A]t that point I had strong beliefs
 about not killing myself.... So I put myself in a position to have the state
 kill me."

 Charlie Brown and Charles Kelley committed murders in Minnesota in 1962, then
 came to Iowa to commit another, particularly horrible killing. They asked to
 be tried in Iowa because it had a death penalty, while Minnesota did not.
 Brown said, "I want to die for what I did. I don't want to spend the rest of
 my life in jail." The state of Iowa accommodated his request and executed
both
 men. Former Iowa Gov. Robert Ray often has cited their case as an example of
 murder attracted by capital punishment. Iowa abolished the death sentence in
 the mid 1960s.

 Aberrations or a troubling pattern?

 Extensive media coverage is given to criminals facing execution. While some
of
 the residents of death row proclaim their innocence and others claim
 repentance, still others seem to welcome their demise. These latter cases
 raise important policy questions. Are they aberrations or part of a
consistent
 and troubling pattern? Are innocent persons-the victims-put at risk in death
 penalty states?

 In 1993, Westley Allan Dodd was hanged in the prison at Walla Walla, Wash. He
 stalked and murdered two young boys, strangled a third, and then was arrested
 while trying to abduct a six-year-old boy from a movie theater. He readily
 confessed to the killings, showed pictures of the victims to the police, and
 insisted on execution by hanging. Several witnesses claimed that he had a
 religious conversion in his final hour.

 Also in 1993, a headline in The Chicago Tribune declared: "AIDS Patient
 Charged in Attack with Syringe." Trannie Blue had attacked a nurse at the
 University of Chicago Hospital with a syringe filled with his HIV-infected
 blood. According to the Cook County state attorney, Blue told investigators
he
 had done so because he wanted to receive the death penalty and end his
 suffering.

 In The Execution Protocol, Stephen Trombley reports on a story from the
 Missouri State Penitentiary. Two prisoners became lovers; one ended up on
 death row after killing two inmates. In order to join him, the other one
 strangled his cellmate. They now are together on death row.

 Thomas Grasso, serving a life sentence in New York, requested to be
 transferred to Oklahoma on a previous murder charge. He would rather be
 executed than grow old in prison, he said. Then-New York Gov. Mario Cuomo
 refused to extradite Grasso, but his successor, George Pataki, had Grasso
 returned to Oklahoma soon after Pataki took office in January, 1995.

 A small minority of sick and suicidal individuals find the prospect of highly
 publicized punishment intriguing. Such people are sufficiently irrational to
 wreak havoc upon themselves and others, yet rational enough to plot out this
 destructive course to its bitter and gruesome end.

 Those most prone to carry out execution-inspired homicides are young white
 males with a history of unsuccessful suicide attempts. Restrictions on the
 scope of capital punishment are not a barrier to them. If the death penalty
is
 limited to the death of police officers or Federal marshals, then a police
 officer or a Federal marshal will become the target. The same holds true with
 prison murders, crimes of an especialty heinous nature, murder for hire, etc.
 that call for the death penalty. For each group targeted in that state, there
 is an increased risk for the commission of those designated crimes. The
 notoriety generated through the mass media to those scheduled for execution
 provides additional attraction to the Richard Specks who say they are "born
to
 raise hell" and to the Sherril Harstons who beg for death by "the electrical
 hanging tree."

 When cases such as those described above are examined individually, each
seems
 to be one of a kind, a bizarre product of a sick mind. When all are
considered
 together, though, a pattern emerges. There is a method in such seemingly
 senseless murders. "I couldn't do it myself," the killers say. "I needed the
 state to do it for me."

 In this pattern of calculated, externally inflicted suicide, there is a
danger
 in even just having the death penalty on the statute book in a state. For
 every person who verbalized this wish of execution, there probably are many
 others who failed to reveal their innermost motives. Death by lethal
injection
 would seem to offer an especially easy way out to one desirous of this form
of
 state-sponsored euthanasia.

 Dr. Van Wormer is associated professor of social work, University of Northern
 Iowa, Cedar Falls.

                                 -- End --
 __________
earthradioTV.com - Alternative News Portal for ecology, politics &
consciousness.           mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
earthradioTV.com MIRROR SITES:
USA     http://www.earthradioTV.com/
CZECH   http://mujweb.cz/www/ecologynews/
UK      http://members.tripod.co.uk/ecologynews/
Canada http://www.ecologynews.com

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
<A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to