[CTRL] [PERSIANS-JEWS-FLIES] The Invasion of Saudi Arabia and Iran (fwd)
-Caveat Lector- -- Forwarded message -- Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 16:49:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Party of Citizens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [PERSIANS-JEWS-FLIES] The Invasion of Saudi Arabia and Iran * http://www.geocities.com/partyofcitizens ** On Sun, 24 Aug 2003, Labour Welfare Party wrote: The Shaken House of Saud Daily Telegraph Editorial 14/8/2003 Even more unsettling are the political implications for Saudi Arabia. The recent release of British nationals, who say they were tortured into confessing bomb attacks in the kingdom, has highlighted the fact that the Saudi authorities still have not confronted the threat posed by al-Qa'eda. Their attitude is at best ambiguous, at worst duplicitous. There will be no end to terrorism until Saudi Arabia and Iran are invaded and occupied and democratized like Iraq. Go for it, El Moron! POC Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-- Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for Your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark Printer at Myinks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US Canada. http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511 http://us.click.yahoo.com/l.m7sD/LIdGAA/qnsNAA/TM0rlB/TM -~- This is ARMAGEDDON as General Scowcroft has called it; the APOCALYPSE as others have called it. But the WHITEHOUSE and U-S-A Congress have chosen the FATE OF THE WORLD! Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ www.ctrl.org DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ A HREF=http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ctrl/A To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
[CTRL] 'Smart' Dust Knows where to Go
-Caveat Lector- http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2cid=570u=/nm/20030825/sc_nm/science_dust_dcprinter=1 'Smart' Dust Knows where to Go Mon Aug 25, 5:11 PM ET Add Science - Reuters to My Yahoo! WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Tiny silicon crystals that can line themselves up according to order may be a first step to making "smart dust" that could detect biological or chemical agents or disease-causing microbes, U.S. researchers said on Monday. A team at the University of California, San Diego said they had created microscopic grains of sand that can orient themselves. "This is a key development in what we hope will one day make possible the development of robots the size of a grain of sand," said Michael Sailor, a professor at UCSD's department of chemistry and biochemistry who led the study. "The vision is to build miniature devices that can move with ease through a tiny environment, such as a vein or an artery, to specific targets, then locate and detect chemical or biological compounds and report this information to the outside world," Sailor added in a statement. "Such devices could be used to monitor the purity of drinking or sea water, to detect hazardous chemical or biological agents in the air or even to locate and destroy tumor cells in the body." Writing in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (news - web sites), Sailor and graduate student Jamie Link said their little grains of smart dust consist of two colored mirrors, green on one side and red on the other. One side was designed to find and stick to water, the other to oil. When lined up correctly, the mirrors shone either red or green. Link and Sailor first used chemicals to etch one side of a silicon chip, making it mirror-like and green. They made it repel water by attaching a water-repellent chemical. They etched the other side of the chip to create a porous red mirror, then exposed it to air so that it became attractive to water. Using vibrations, they broke the chip into tiny pieces, each about the size of the diameter of a human hair. Each piece became, in essence, a tiny sensor with a red surface attracted to water and a green surface attracted to oil. Each one is too small to see individually but when they clump up they are clearly visible. Attaching the correct "recognition elements" could make the little chip particles into tools for biodetection or medical uses, the researchers said. www.ctrl.org DECLARATION DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. Archives Available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ A HREF=""ctrl/A To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
Re: [CTRL] Just the facts...
-Caveat Lector- Oh Shannon, you really should read a valuable book called How to Lie With Statisics. It's a classic. Here is a response to one of the statistics you posted. Anyone looking at the organization source for the article you posted should note that the sources are very leftist and generally pro-Palestinian organizations. I've eliminated the graphic charts which can be seen at the site and am sending this plain text. http://www.ict.org.il/articles/articledet.cfm?articleid=440 June 20, 2002 Updated: May 21, 2003 The al-Aqsa Intifada An Engineered Tragedy Summary of Findings Don Radlauer ICT Associate An ongoing study by the International Policy Institute for Counter-Terrorism (ICT) at the Interdisciplinary Center in Herzliya provides an in-depth look at the fatalities on both sides of the current Palestinian/Israeli conflict. Based on thorough research using Palestinian and Israeli open sources, the study provides a breakdown of those killed by age, gender, and combatant status. The results lead to some surprising conclusions. Combatants, Noncombatants, and Responsibility Almost 1900 Palestinians have been killed since the start of the al-Aqsa Intifada, compared to almost 700 Israelis. Numbers like these are used to create an image of lopsided slaughter, with Israel cast as the villain. But such numbers distort the true picture: They lump combatants in with noncombatants, suicide bombers with innocent civilians, and report Palestinian collaborators murdered by their own compatriots as if they had been killed by Israel. More meaningful figures show that Israel is responsible for some 733 Palestinian noncombatant deaths, while Palestinians have killed 546 Israeli noncombatants. Over 54 percent of the Palestinians killed were actively involved in fighting and this does not include stone-throwers or unknowns. And Palestinians are directly responsible for the deaths of at least 253 of their own number more than one out of every eight Palestinians killed. On the Israeli side, 80 percent of those killed have been noncombatants. While Israelis account for about 27 percent of the total Intifada fatalities, they represent over 43 percent of the noncombatant victims. Breakdown by Gender Women and girls account for 31 percent of all Israelis killed in the conflict, and almost 40 percent of the Israeli noncombatants killed by Palestinians. Palestinian fatalities, in contrast, have been consistently and overwhelmingly (over 95 percent) male; even when combatants (almost all of whom have been male) are removed from consideration, just 8 percent of Palestinians killed by Israel have been female. In absolute terms, even though more Palestinians than Israelis have been killed overall, Israeli female fatalities have far outnumbered Palestinian female fatalities. If we include all reliable reports of women and girls killed in the conflict, the ratio is 219 Israeli females compared to 92 Palestinian females a ratio of almost 2.5 to 1. If we restrict the comparison to noncombatant Israeli females killed by Palestinians and noncombatant Palestinian females killed by Israel, the difference is even more dramatic: 69 Palestinians compared to 214 Israelis, a ratio of three to one. Breakdown by Age Israeli combatant fatalities are concentrated in a narrow age range, as we would expect for soldiers in a uniformed army. Israeli noncombatants, in contrast, display a near-random age distribution. This is equally unsurprising, given that these fatalities are the result of terrorist attacks on accessible civilian targets. Palestinian fatalities present a quite different picture. Palestinian combatant fatalities, like those on the Israeli side, are concentrated in a narrow age range although this concentration is slightly less pronounced. (This is unsurprising, given that Palestinian combatants are mostly members of unofficial terrorist/guerilla organizations.) Palestinian noncombatant fatalities, however, show an age distribution completely unlike that on the Israeli side. Instead of a sloppy distribution over a broad range of ages, Palestinian noncombatant fatalities are heavily concentrated among teenagers and young adults. Mature and Young Fatalities A more specific focus on older and younger victims of the conflict further highlights the difference between Palestinian and Israeli noncombatant fatalities. When we compare the mature noncombatant Israelis killed by Palestinians to the mature Palestinian noncombatants killed by Israel, we see that the Israeli death toll far exceeds the Palestinian. In fact, Palestinians have killed at least 174 noncombatant Israelis aged 45 and over, while Israelis have killed 65 Palestinian noncombatants in the same age bracket. The ratio is 2.7 to 1. When we look at children and teenaged noncombatants killed in the conflict, we see a rather strange pattern. Among both Palestinians and Israelis, the number of young children (under the age of ten years old)
[CTRL] Hamas and International Law
Title: Message -Caveat Lector- On Hamas "Freedom Fighters": The View From International Law 20 August 2003 Even now, even after repeated Hamas suicide-bomb attacks on Israeli buses, pizza restaurants, ice-cream parlors, kibbutz nurseries and preschools, some still argue passionately that the ends of barbaric Palestinian violence justify the means that an end to the so-called Israeli "occupation" justifies premeditated murder of any and all Israelis. Leaving aside both ordinary ethical standards (by which this argument is manifestly indecent) and the uncontested fact that Israel came into inadvertent control of West Bank and Gaza in 1967 because of undisguised Arab aggression, the ends can never justify the means under authoritative international law. On the contrary, for more than two thousand years, binding legal rules of world politics have stipulated that intentional violence against the innocent is always repugnant and always prohibited. From the standpoint of international law, one man's terrorist can never be another man's freedom-fighter. This empty witticism, although now repeated ritually by various unschooled newspaper reporters and by smooth radio and television pundits seeking to appear clever, is jurisprudentially meaningless. It is true, to be sure, that certain insurgencies can indeed be judged lawful (a judgment without which the United States of America would never have been properly constituted), but even these permissible resorts to force must always conform to the laws of war. Wherever an insurgent group resorts to unjust means, its actions are unambiguously terroristic. The rules of war bind all belligerents,insurgents as well as states. It follows that even if Hamas claims of an Israeli "occupation" were correct rather than concocted, their corresponding claim of entitlement to oppose Israel "by any means necessary" would remain unsupportable. International law has determinable form and content. It cannot be invented and reinvented by terror groups merely to accommodate their own adversarial interests. This is especially the case where terror violence purposely targets infants, children and the elderly, the quintessentially characteristic targeting signature of Hamas and its many Palestinian cousins. There are fixed and precise standards that must be applied in judgment of all insurgent resorts to violence. These standards are known in law as just cause and just means. These standards, and these standards alone, allow us to distinguish lawful insurgency from terrorism. When they are applied to Hamas, the distinction is not difficult to make. According to the explicitly genocidal Charter of Hamas: "The time (salvation) will not come until Muslims will fight the Jews and kill them." This fight is against all Jews: "The Nazism of the Jews," says the Charter, "does not skip women and children" every Jew, therefore, is a proper target. Palestinian terrorists believe that they have just cause because they legally deserve a state; because there is under authoritative international law a general right of "peoples" to "self-determination." But the proposed Palestinian state of the Road Map is openly intended to be built upon the mutilated corpse of an existing state, the Jewish State of Israel. There are no two states in the Palestinian Final Solution. What is currently called Israel or "The Zionist Entity" is merely "occupied Palestine." Returning to the precise words of the Hamas Charter: "Israel will rise and will remain erect until Islam eliminates it as it had eliminated its predecessors." On the very same day that he signed the Declaration of Principles in 1993, Yasser Arafat addressed the Palestinian people on Jordanian television. There he assured his listeners that Oslo I was nothing more than a codified implementation of the 1974 PLO "Plan of Phases," a 10-point scheme for the incremental destruction of Israel. "The first stage," said Arafat, "is the establishment of a national authority on any part of Palestinian soil that is liberated or from which the Israelis withdraw." Exactly the same assertion was repeated by Chairman Arafat after the signing of Oslo II. Let us return to the other legal criterion of permissible armed force. National liberation movements that fail to meet the test of just means are never protected as lawful or legitimate. Even if we
[CTRL] NYTimes.com Article: John Rhodes, 86, Lawmaker Key to Nixon's Quitting, Dies
-Caveat Lector- This article from NYTimes.com has been sent to you by [EMAIL PROTECTED] One of the string-pullers. [EMAIL PROTECTED] / advertisement ---\ Explore more of Starbucks at Starbucks.com. http://www.starbucks.com/default.asp?ci=1015 \--/ John Rhodes, 86, Lawmaker Key to Nixon's Quitting, Dies August 26, 2003 By JENNIFER 8. LEE WASHINGTON, Aug. 25 - John J. Rhodes, the former House Republican leader who swayed President Richard M. Nixon to resign in the Watergate scandal, died on Sunday night at his home in Mesa, Ariz. He was 86. The cause was cancer, his former press secretary, Jay Smith, said. Originally a staunch defender of Nixon, Mr. Rhodes became a central figure in the battle over Watergate when, as a prominent Republican, he publicly called for Nixon to consider resigning. Pushing for a thorough investigation of the break-in at the Democratic National Committee headquarters in the Watergate Hotel in Washington, Mr. Rhodes headed off efforts by Nixon's supporters to downgrade the impeachment effort into a vote of censure and to set a time limit on the Congressional inquiry into the role of the White House and the Nixon reelection campaign. After tape recordings came out on Aug. 5, 1974, showing that Nixon had discussed using the Central Intelligence Agency to sidetrack the Federal Bureau of Investigation inquiry on Watergate, Mr. Rhodes announced that he would vote for impeachment. He was one of three Republicans who met the president on Aug. 7 to inform him that his support in Congress had deteriorated and that he faced certain impeachment. The next day, Nixon resigned. Mr. Smith, who now runs a public relations firm in Virginia, said about Mr. Rhodes: He called that day the saddest day of his life. Mr. Rhodes, whose father was a lumber dealer who became the state treasurer in Kansas, was born on Sept. 18, 1916, in Council Grove, Kan., a small farming community. After graduating from Kansas State University and the Harvard Law School, Mr. Rhodes married Mary Elizabeth Harvey, in 1942. Struck by the beauty of Arizona while they were stationed there in World War II, Mr. Rhodes and his wife settled in Mesa after he left the Army Air Corps. He opened a law practice and was later elected Arizona's first Republican House member, in 1952, the year of Dwight D. Eisenhower's Republican landslide. As a congressman, he attracted federal money to his home state by pushing for the Central Arizona Project, which channeled water from the Colorado River into the Arizona desert. Considered a conservative party loyalist, Mr. Rhodes worked his way up the ranks of the Republican House leadership to become minority leader, succeeding Gerald R. Ford after Mr. Ford was appointed vice president under Nixon in 1973, when Spiro T. Agnew was driven from that office. Mr. Rhodes had ambitions to be House speaker, but those hopes dimmed after a backlash against Watergate cost the Republicans 48 seats in the midterm election in 1974. Mr. Rhodes continued as Republican leader until 1980 and retired in 1982. In that time, he published The Futile System, in which he criticized Congress as a pitiful helpless giant, devoid of coordination or purpose. Considered colorless by some but trustworthy by others, Mr. Rhodes was a master of parliamentary procedure and was noted for getting the House Republicans to vote as a bloc. George F. Will wrote in a newspaper column, One glance tells you that God had a congressman in mind when he made John Rhodes. But Mr. Rhodes's appearance was so nondescript that he attracted attention when he changed his hairstyle from a military flattop to a slightly longer style more in line with the fashions of the 1970's. His civility was noted by Democrats. He was one of the old-time Republicans that were conservative but very wonderful toward his opposition, said the Rev. Robert F. Drinan, a Democratic congressman from Massachusetts from 1971 to 1981 who now teaches at the Georgetown University Law Center. Mr. Rhodes was a close friend and adviser of President Ford, praying with him on Wednesdays after he took office. Mr. Rhodes was also an avid golf player, though he often said his game was so bad that it could do nothing but improve. Surviving are his wife; 4 children, Thomas, James, Elizabeth Reich and John III, who also served four terms in Congress; and 12 grandchildren. http://www.nytimes.com/2003/08/26/obituaries/26RHOD.html?ex=1062889404ei=1en=107de5c8a1a77124 - Get Home Delivery of The New York Times Newspaper. Imagine reading The New York Times any time anywhere you like! Leisurely catch up on events expand your horizons. Enjoy now for 50% off Home Delivery! Click here: http://www.nytimes.com/ads/nytcirc/index.html HOW TO ADVERTISE - For information on advertising in e-mail newsletters or
[CTRL] Police State Update: The war on civil liberties road show
-Caveat Lector- Liberty Action of the Week: August 26,2003 The war on civil liberties road show by Mary Lou Seymour The Justice Department says its traveling road show to tout the benefits of the Patriot Act is intended to combat misunderstandings the public has about the sweeping legislation passed almost unanimously by a terrified Congress in the wake of 9-11. Unfortunately for our would be rulers in the dismal swamp of Washington DC, the public wasn't as universally cowed by 9-11 and ready to exchange liberty for security as Congress was. After a slow start, the movement to form Bill of Rights Defense Committees and pass community resolutions condemning the act as an infringement of civil liberties and even, in some cases, setting fines for those who don't promptly notify the city manager if federal law enforcement authorities contact them seeking help in an investigation, interrogation or arrest under the provisions of the act (Communities shun Patriot Act) caught fire and swept through the country. Not only did the civil libertarians and more alert members of the public react strongly to Patriot I, after the initial shock of 9-11 wore off, but when in February 2003 news of the Son of the Patriot Act, the Domestic Security Enhancement Act of 2003, leaked out (War on civil liberties heats up), within days columnists were calling DESA a Total police state takeover and noting that this time, unlike the rush to pass Patriot I, there was a Chilly response to Patriot II. Patriot II then dropped out of the news, presumably in the hope the public would forget all about it in the patriotic fervor surrounding the invasion (whoops, liberation) of Iraq. But throughout America, activists continued quietly lobbying their communities to pass those darn community resolutions, until as of this writing, the ACLU lists more than 150 communities in 28 states, including three state-wide resolutions, representing approximately 17.4 million people who oppose the USA PATRIOT Act. And then the occupation of Iraq started going sour and Congress began chipping away at the more onerous segments of Patriot I such as last month's lopsided U.S. House vote forbidding Justice from spending funds to use the act's controversial 'sneak and peak' provision that authorizes federal agents to conduct secret searches of homes and businesses. (Ashcroft's Campaign to Shore Up the Patriot Act) This wasn't supposed to happen, of course. The public and Congress were supposed to not only meekly go along with Patriot I, but accept even more onerous legislation, such as Patriot II. In July, Ashcroft himself, speaking in Anchorage, Alaska (where the state legislature had just passed resolutions protesting the national anti-terrorism law) told federal and local officials the USA Patriot Act should be expanded, not softened. (Toughen Patriot Act, Ashcroft says) So, in desperation, Ashcroft has set off on a whirlwind tour of 18 cities in 10 days, promoting the USA PATRIOT Act and preparing the public for a sequel. (Highly Watchable) Brother John's traveling patriot salvation show, as Elaine Cassel of Civil Liberties Watch dubs the publicity tour, is designed to convince law enforcement officials that preserving security is essential to preserving freedom, as the Patriot Act campaign web site Preserving Life and Liberty puts it. Oh yeah, they even have a web site. That's for us peons, who won't get to hear what Brother John tells the law enforcement officials in their private meetings. Supposedly,as part of the campaign, all 94 U.S. attorneys around the country are being encouraged to hold town hall-style events to discuss the Patriot Act and its role in preventing terror (Ashcroft begins Patriot Act tour), but so far, Attorney General Ashcroft has chosen to avoid speaking to the American people. Instead he prefers to confine his speaking to hand- picked audiences, thus creating the illusion of agreement and consensus. (Attorney General Ducks Demonstrators on Visit to Iowa's Heartland) Demonstrators have been forced to demonstrate outside the hotel where he spoke in Des Moines, or outside the newly built Constitution Hall in Philadelphia, another city where officials have passed a resolution condemning the anti-terror act. (Ashcroft says Patriot Act Effective) So far, demonstrations have pulled around 100 people. Of course, it's kinda hard to oprganize a demonstration when it isn't even public knowledge which cities are on the tour list, or where in that city the private meeting might be held. In researching this column, I checked numerous sources, and could only find vague references to 18 cities, including Washington, Detroit, Philadelphia, Milwaukee, Des Moines, or Ashcroft's tour began in Philadelphia and continued to Ohio yesterday, then to Michigan and Iowa, with other stops planned in coming weeks. But not only is Ashcroft plugging the Patriot Act, he's also setting the stage for the next step in the war on civil liberties ... the
[CTRL] Mossad's Record
-Caveat Lector- http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=1032 Mossad's Record Bob from Michigan In Victor Ostrovsky's book, "By Way of Deception: A Devastating Insider's Portrait of the Mossad (Toronto:Stoddart, 1990)" we discover many remarkable things about this "extreme right" organization. "Ostrovsky, a Canadian born of an Israeli mother and Canadian Jewish father, spent most of his formative years in Holon, Israel. He was, at age 18, the youngest officer in the Israeli military. A weapons-testing expert, he was recruited by the Mossad and completed their extensive training program, becoming a katsa, or case officer, only to grow disillusioned with the organization's aims and operations and return to Canada." In his own words: "I was elated when I was chosen and granted the privilege to join what I considered to be the elite team of the Mossad. But it was the twisted ideals and self-centered pragmatism that I encountered inside the Mossad, coupled with this so-called team's greed, lust, and total lack of respect for human life, that motivated me to tell this story. It is out of love for Israel as a free and just country that I am laying my life on the line by so doing, facing up to those who took it upon themselves to turn the Zionist dream into the present-day nightmare." Spying on American Citizens First off, we learn that the Mossad often receives information from the CIA, while it has a policy of never giving such information out --even if the lives of Americans are in danger. Also, we discover that a super-secret division of the Mossad (called Al) is active in New York and Washington --engaged in spying on American citizens, recruiting Jewish "helpers", and carrying out covert activities [like the bombing of the TWA flight to Paris]. It employs between 24 and 27 field personnel, and most of their activity is with U.S. borders (primarily New York and Washington). Systemic Utilization of Jewish Abuse of Position We discover also that, thanks to the threat of anti-Semitism, the Mossad can tap the "significant and loyal cadre of the worldwide Jewish community outside Israel." These volunteer Jewish helpers, placed in convenient positions, can, say, help agents secure documents from their employer's office, or money if needed, or keys to a person's room in the hotel where they work (for assassination). Apparently the threat of anti-Semitism, which is exaggerated by orthodox groups to enforce cohesivity, results in a reflexive betrayal of social positions and trusts whenever the specter of anti-Semitism is manifested by Mossad agents. The unfortunate consequence of this policy is that the only way to eliminate the security threat posed by the Mossad, is to eliminate all people of Jewish origin from sensitive positions in the country. The Bombing of an Innocent Libya We are informed, in Victor Ostrovsky's next book "The Other Side of Deception," that the Mossad was the controlling force responsible for the American action against both Libya and Iraq. It is a remarkable story of how American sentiment was manipulated by the subterfuges of a foreign country, the outcome of which could only entail the risking of American lives (Iraq: at least 600 dead) and the enmity of the Arab world --the very people who supply us with oil. The Mossad placed a transmitter on Libyan soil which made it appear that Libya was sending terrorist orders to its various embassies, which the gullible Americans decoded and considered to be real, even though they failed to predict the attack on Le Discotheque in West Germany which --ironically-- was the very "provocation" which was used to justify the strike. Only the French, whose secret service is more astute at recognizing the hand of Mossad, were not fooled. And this was the reason why the French did not allow the United States to use their airspace for what was, in essence, an aggressive act against an innocent party --An act which resulted in the death of three Americans and forty Libyan civilians, including Qadhafi's adopted daughter. The Terrorist Bombing of the TWA Flight [This refusal, and French suspicion of Mossad in general suggests a motive for the TWA flight bombing of a plane headed for Paris, by the Mossad who --as it was already pointed out-- are fully active in New York. The bomb was likely placed on a fuel tank by a "Jewish helper" --an employee of the airport. This was an attempt, along with the bombing of the U.S. base in Saudi Arabia, to make these look like the work of Arab terrorists to drive a wedge between the West and the Arabs. In the case of the U.S. base, they may have actually helped real Palestinian terrorists accomplish this aim --as they also helped Palestinian terrorists in the attempted assassination of George Bush (see below).] The Persian Gulf War "Even as early as May 1, 1986 was the Mossad working on building up Saddam Hussein as a great threat to the world. The main reason for this was the threat his giant
[CTRL] MRC Alert Special: TimesWatch.org Highlights (fwd)
-Caveat Lector- I pledge Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America and to the REPUBLIC for which it stands, one Nation under God,indivisible,with liberty and justice for all. visit my web site at http://www.voicenet.com/~wbacon My ICQ# is 79071904 for a precise list of the powers of the Federal Government linkto: http://www.voicenet.com/~wbacon/Enumerated.html -- Forwarded message -- Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 02:30:00 -0700 From: Media Research Center [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: MRC Alert Special: TimesWatch.org Highlights ***Media Research Center CyberAlert Special*** 5:30am EDT, Tuesday August 26, 2003 Highlights from Recent Postings on the MRC's TimesWatch.org Today, highlights of the more interesting articles written in the past week or so by Clay Waters and posted by David Bozell, on the MRC's TimesWatch.org Web site dedicated to documenting and exposing the liberal political agenda of the New York Times. -- Some Critics = One Times Reporter Jeffrey Gettleman's latest story on Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore (the Ten Commandments judge) claimed: Some critics have compared Chief Justice Moore to George Wallace, Alabama's segregationist governor. In this case, some critics equaled Jeffrey Gettleman. See: http://www.timeswatch.org/articles/2003/0825.asp -- Hamas Spells Hope to Destitute Palestinians The Times again delivered a charitable view of the anti-Israel terrorist group Hamas: Mr. Bush risks fueling anti-American anger among Palestinians who not only depend on assistance from Hamas but also see it as an integral part of their lives. See: http://www.timeswatch.org/articles/2003/0825.asp#2 -- Civil Rights or Just Liberal Interest Groups? Lynette Clemetson reported on the 40th anniversary of the March on Washington for civil rights: The Arab American Institute and the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force, show the expanding breadth of the civil rights movement. See: http://www.timeswatch.org/articles/2003/0825.asp#3 -- Deregulation a Dirty Word in Times Land The headline to a front-page blackout story blared: Reliability Suffered in Deregulation, Experts Say. But the actual story accurately notes: Deregulation is actually a misnomer for the restructuring of the power industry, because only the generation of electricity was freed from strict government controls. See: http://www.timeswatch.org/articles/2003/0825.asp#4 -- Conservative California Cannibalism John Broder blamed rigid conservatism and the customary ideological rigidity of conservatives for Republican losses in California. See: http://www.timeswatch.org/articles/2003/0825.asp#5 -- A Communist Photographer With a Belief in Progress Times art critic Holland Carter fawned over a Milton Rogovin photography exhibit, noting the politically engaged Rogovin based his work on a humanistic belief in progress. Yet the elderly Rogovin was a Communist Party member and remained so even after Josef Stalin's purges became common knowledge. See: http://www.timeswatch.org/articles/2003/0822.asp#2 -- Christianity in a Positive Light? Now That's Offensive Bruce Weber reviewed some of the outré offerings at the NYC Fringe Festival, and one show offended his sensibilities so much he walked out. Was it Daddy Kathryn, a comedy about a gay son's wacky relationship with his newly outed transvestite father? No. It was Discordant Duets, the one avowedly pro-Christian work in the festival. (Weber admitted the born-again crowd might like the simple-minded drama.) See: http://www.timeswatch.org/articles/2003/0819.asp#2 -- For the latest comments on the New York Times from around the Web, check the Elsewhere on the Web page: http://www.timeswatch.org/elsewhere/welcome.asp # For the latest examples of liberal bias in the New York Times, check: http://www.timeswatch.org -- Brent Baker, in New Hampshire Support the MRC, an educational foundation dependent upon contributions which make CyberAlert possible, by providing a tax- deductible donation. Be sure to fill in CyberAlert in the field which asks: What led you to become a member or donate today? For the secure donations page: https://secure.mediaresearch.org/Donation/Order/MediaResearch25-27/mck-cgi/mrcdonate.asp To subscribe to CyberAlert, send a blank e-mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the link at the very bottom of this message. Send problems and comments to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can learn what has been posted each day on the MRC's Web site by subscribing to the MRC Web Site News distributed every weekday afternoon. To subscribe, go to: http://www.mediaresearch.org/cybersub.asp#webnews Update your profile here: http://mrccyberalert.u.tclk.net/survey/?bUrD57.a6hcmw.d2JhY29u Unsubscribe here:
