Re: [CTRL] Fw: Will Dems steal the WA governorship?

2004-12-01 Thread Jim Rarey
-Caveat Lector-



Not a "Dead" constitution but a stable one. One that can only be changed by 
the Congress and states. If they were following original intent, we wouldn't 
have most of the "Patriot" Act and the other abominations. 

You and the public have been conned into believing that once the president 
declares a state of national emergency, the restrictions of the Constitution no 
longer apply.to arbitrary and patently unconstitutional actions of the 
government. It's the "living constitution" that is allowing the erection of a 
police state. You have no basis for complaining since you are championing the 
anti-constitution forces and making up strawmen to denigrate the real defenders 
of freedom and the constitution.

JR

- Original Message - 
From: flw2 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 12:20 PM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Fw: Will Dems steal the WA 
governorship?
-Caveat Lector- This is so outrageous it 
certainly will be reversed on appeal if these tactics change the 
vote totals in favor of Gregoire. Judge Lum should be impeached and 
removed from office. This is a good example of the attitude too many 
judges have that they can ignore or overrule the law to reach a 
"desirable" result. That's the "living constitution" in action. - 
JRHa Ha. Guess the RepubliKrats prefer a 'dead' Constitution. Such as 
whenthey push through Police State anti freedom anti Bill of Rights 
travestieslike the Patriot Act and pro Taliban stuff like anti pornography 
obsessionsor banning pain killers for dying people.fl.ctrl.orgDECLARATION  
DISCLAIMER==CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange 
list. Proselytizing propagandicscreeds are unwelcomed. Substanceâ?"not 
soap-boxingâ?"please! These aresordid matters and 'conspiracy 
theory'â?"with its many half-truths, mis-directions and outright fraudsâ?"is 
used politically by different groups withmajor and minor effects spread 
throughout the spectrum of time and thought.That being said, CTRLgives no 
endorsement to the validity of posts, andalways suggests to readers; be wary 
of what you read. CTRL gives nocredence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need 
not apply.Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat 
Lector.Archives 
Available at:http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/A 
HREF="">ctrlhttp://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/"ctrl/ATo 
subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:SUBSCRIBE CTRL 
[to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]To 
UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:SIGNOFF CTRL 
[to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]Om
www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/
A HREF=""ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om


[CTRL] Key Antigun Program Loses Direct Financing

2004-12-02 Thread Jim Rarey
-Caveat Lector-



http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/02/politics/02guns.html?pagewanted=printposition=



  
  
 
  
  
  December 2, 2004
  Key Antigun Program Loses Direct 
  FinancingBy ERIC LICHTBLAU 
  


  
  ASHINGTON, Dec. 1 - Congress has eliminated direct 
  financing for a Justice Department program that has been the centerpiece 
  of the Bush administration's efforts to prosecute black-market gun crimes. 
  
  The move, which Congressional officials attributed to competing budget 
  priorities, cuts federal grants to local and state law enforcement 
  agencies in investigating and prosecuting crimes committed with guns. It 
  also raises questions about the administration's ability to persuade the 
  Republican-controlled Congress to support its legislative priorities, 
  after Republicans last month blocked an intelligence overhaul backed by 
  the White House. 
  The administration had sought $45 million for local grants under the 
  gun prosecution program, Project Safe Neighborhoods. That would have 
  represented a sharp increase in grants for a program that President Bush 
  and Attorney General John Ashcroft have hailed as a critical way to crack 
  down on gun trafficking and gun-related crimes. 
  "If you use a gun illegally, you will do hard time," Mr. Bush is quoted 
  as saying on the Web site for the neighborhoods program, www. 
  projectsafeneighborhoods.com. 
  But in passing a $388 billion spending bill on Nov. 20, Congress erased 
  all the direct money sought for the program. A related program to track 
  and intercept illegal purchases of guns by youngsters, for which the 
  administration sought an additional $106 million, also received nothing in 
  the final spending package, although the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, 
  Firearms and Explosives, which administers it, received an overall 
  increase of $20 million. 
  "We didn't specifically set aside any money for the program," a 
  spokesman for the House Appropriations Committee, John Scofield, said. 
  "But we think we've taken care of the need because we provided $900 
  million over what the administration asked for in other general assistance 
  for states and locals." 
  Most of those broader programs are not specifically tied to gun 
  enforcement, but instead provide money for a variety of law enforcement 
  problems like detaining illegal immigrants and gang violence and could be 
  used to supplement gun programs, Mr. Scofield said, adding that the 
  reduction in direct financing for the gun program "is the reality of a 
  lean budget." 
  "It's a matter of priorities," he said, "and there are going to be 
  things you can fund and things you can't." 
  A spokeswoman for the Justice Department, Monica Goodling, said that 
  the department "was disappointed that Congress did not provide the full 
  amount that President Bush sought" but would "continue to vigorously 
  combat gun crime in America."
  The immediate effects of the cutback on gun investigations and 
  prosecutions is unclear. Financing for other antigun programs related to 
  Safe Neighborhoods remain intact, totaling $200 million, and 
  administration officials said they would try to find money from elsewhere 
  to offset the gap that Congress left. Indeed, Chris W. Cox, chief lobbyist 
  for the National Rifle Association, which has been a major backer of the 
  gun program as a way to keep firearms out of the hands of criminals, said 
  he believed that financing in the federal pipeline and improved 
  cooperation in place at the local, state and federal levels would allow 
  the initiative to continue uninterrupted "whether or not there's a 
  specific line-item."
  Gun control advocates and some law enforcement officials said they 
  believed that the cutback sent a troubling message about the federal 
  commitment to fighting gun crime and trafficking. 
  "The administration has been touting this program as one of their great 
  successes," John Lacey, an official with Americans for Gun Safety, said. 
  "So the fact that they're letting this program just disappear speaks to 
  the fact that either they are unwilling to combat gun crime or their 
  promises on gun crime have been just empty rhetoric."
  Joe Vince, a former official at the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and 
  Firearms who is a private consultant on gun safety, said the elimination 
  of important parts of the program suggested a lack of commitment to 
  cracking down on crimes involving guns.
  "Across the country, cities are starting to see an increase in 
  gun-related violent crimes, and Project Safe Neighborhoods was a way for 
  local law enforcement to 

[CTRL] Prince Bernhard, Father of Dutch Queen, Dies at 93

2004-12-02 Thread Jim Rarey
-Caveat Lector-



Sounds harmless doesn't he? - JR

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/02/international/europe/02bernhard.html?pagewanted=printposition=



  
  
 
  
  
  December 2, 2004
  Prince Bernhard, Father of Dutch Queen, Dies at 
  93By DOUGLAS MARTIN 
  


  
  Prince Bernhard, a bon vivant and outspoken member of an ancient German 
  royal family who became husband of one queen of the Netherlands and father of another, 
  died yesterday at a hospital in Utrecht near Amsterdam. He was 93.
  The Royal House of the Netherlands said that in November he was 
  diagnosed with cancer, which spread to his stomach and lungs.
  For six decades, Prince Bernhard lived at the royal palace in Soestdijk 
  with his wife, Queen Juliana. His daughter Beatrix became queen in 1980. 
  Juliana died this March at the age of 94.
  Prince Bernhard earned global prominence by helping to 
  establish the World Wildlife Fund in 1961 and serving as its 
  president until 1977. He used his many contacts to 
  set up the annual Bilderberg conferences, an annual gathering 
  of top business and political leaders to discuss great issues facing the 
  Western Alliance.
  He emblazoned his dashing personality on his nation with his first 
  official visit to the Netherlands in 1936 with his fiancée, the crown 
  princess. He arrived in a powerful car, racing along the dikes until he 
  was stopped by a policeman for exceeding the speed limit. The Dutch had 
  expected a royal entourage, maybe a whole train.
  The young German prince wore a white carnation in his buttonhole. It 
  soon became a popular decoration and within a few years would become a 
  symbol of resistance against Nazi Germany.
  Prince Bernhard led that resistance after first being suspected of 
  having Nazi sympathies, which he resolutely denied, despite his brief 
  service in a German SS brigade. When the Nazis tried to portray the 
  marriage as an alliance, Queen Wilhelmina, Juliana's mother, declared, 
  "This is a marriage of my daughter to the man she loves. This is not the 
  marriage of the Netherlands to Germany."
  The prince drove fast cars, skied fearlessly and rode his horses hard, 
  but business was at least an equal passion. Not only did his business 
  activities make him one of the richest members of European royalty, but 
  his apparent acceptance in 1976 of a bribe of more than $1 
  million from Lockheed for steering business to the aerospace company, 
  sparked an international scandal.
  Bernhard was born on June 29, 1911, in Jena, Germany, into the princely 
  family of Lippe, which was founded in the 12th century by the first Prince 
  Bernhard. The modern prince was named Bernhard Leopold Friedrich Eberhard 
  Julius Kurt Karl Gottfried Peter Lippe-Biesterfeld of 
  Lippe-Biesterfeld.
  His childhood was spent in the waning days of the splendor of German 
  nobility. After World War I, German nobility had little left beyond a 
  ruined castle or two.
  Bernhard studied the legal aspects of international trade at 
  universities in Lausanne, Switzerland, Munich and Berlin, earning his law degree in Berlin. 
  He joined the staff of the German chemical giant, I.G. 
  Farben and worked at its offices in Paris, Berlin and Amsterdam.
  He met his future wife at the 1936 Olympic Winter Games in Bavaria. 
  They were married on Jan. 7, 1937, in a simple Calvinist ceremony. The 
  prince made a simple speech in fluent Dutch promising to study the 
  country's culture and become a good Dutchman.
  At first, his mother-in-law, and certain of her subjects were publicly 
  critical of his fast driving and absences from church, but his dignified, 
  effective handling of a variety of government jobs quickly won him favor. 
  Queen Wilhelmina appreciated his industriousness.
  "He wanted to earn his own living, and that was an idea of which I very 
  much approved," she said in an interview with The New York Times in 1937. 
  "Princes must work nowadays."
  In May 1940, Hitler invaded the Netherlands, and the prince joined the 
  Dutch forces. He was with the last contingent to hold out in the province 
  of Zeeland. 
  He then headed the Dutch resistance from London where the Dutch government and 
  Queen Wilhelmina resided in exile. His wife left for Canada with the couple's two daughters, 
  Beatrix, who was born in 1938, and Irene, born in 1939. A third daughter, 
  Margriet, was born in Canada in 1943, and a fourth royal daughter, 
  Christina, followed in 1947.
  Bernhard is survived by all his daughters and more than 20 
  grandchildren and great-grandchildren, the Associated Press reported.
  During his last years, he 

[CTRL] 9/11 Families Back Sensenbrenner in Intel Fight

2004-12-02 Thread Jim Rarey
-Caveat Lector-



http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004/12/2/03602.shtml


9/11 Families Back Sensenbrenner in Intel Fight 
Leaders of a group representing more than 300 family members of 
9/11 victims urged Congress on Tuesday to scrap the intelligence reform bill 
because it doesn't include key provisions to secure the nation's borders against 
terrorist infiltration - the same objection raised by one of the bill's leading 
opponents, Wisconsin Rep. James Sensenbrenner.
"No bill should pass the Senate, the House, anywhere, unless it contains 
immigration reform," said Joan Molinaro, the mother of a New York City 
firefighter killed on September 11 and a member of the group "9/11 Families for 
a Secure America." 

Holding up a picture of her son and then a picture of her two daughters, 
Molinaro testified: "You allowed the murder of my son. I will not allow you to 
kill my daughters." 
In quotes picked up by the Washington Times, she added, "You secure our 
borders, you keep my girls alive." 
Debra Burlingame, a spokeswoman for the group whose brother Charles piloted 
the jet that struck the Pentagon, said Wednesday that border enforcement is key 
to any intelligence reform bill. 
Explaining her opposition to the bill, Burlingame told WWRL Radio's Steve 
Malzberg and Karen Hunter that the immigration provisions were opposed by 
special interests in Washington. 
"The agricultural and construction businesses who employ [illegal aliens] 
have big lobbies in Washington," Burlingame said. "You have the banks, who get 
billions of dollars from illegal aliens because they use banks to wire money 
back home." 
"The biggest contributor of all are the immigration lawyers, whose entire 
income stream is derived from getting illegal aliens here and keeping them 
here," she said. 
Burlingame said that "tens of thousands of immigrants who come are 
undocumented people who are claiming asylum, but there is no space to detain 
them," forcing the release of 94 percent of that group into the general 
population. 
"One of the provisions that Rep. Sensenbrenner was trying to get was 
additional bed space so that was can hold them pending a hearing," she 
explained. 
Molinaro, Burlingame and other 9/11 familles who back Sensenbrenner's efforts 
have been largely ignored by the media, which has focused instead on other 
victim families aligned with 9/11 Commission Chairman Tom Kean, who strongly 
backs the bill. 
But Burlingame blasted Chairman Kean on Tuesday, saying he was wrong when he 
insisted that tighter border controls wouldn't have stopped the 9/11 hijackers. 
"He should read his own report," she said. 
9/11 Families for a Secure America plans to launch a radio ad campaign 
praising key House Republicans for opposing the flawed intelligence 
bill
www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/
A HREF=""ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om


[CTRL] Vioxx critic tied to fund?

2004-12-02 Thread Jim Rarey
-Caveat Lector-






  
  

  
  

  


  



  
  

  This just sounds like smart investing. Not like shorting based on 
  inside information. - JR
  
http://money.cnn.com/2004/12/02/news/fortune500/vioxx_fortune.reut/

  


  
  



  
  

  


  

 Vioxx critic tied to 
  fund?Fortune: 
  Doctor who questioned arthritis drug was adviser to hedge fund that 
  shorted Merck.December 2, 2004: 
  10:32 AM EST 
  NEW YORK (Reuters) - A prominent cardiologist who became a chief 
  critic of Merck  Co.'s arthritis drug Vioxx several years before it 
  was withdrawn has been an adviser to a hedge fund that shorted Merck's 
  stock, according to a recent magazine article. 
  Fortune said Dr. Eric Topol, chairman of cardiology at the 
  Cleveland Clinic, began serving on the scientific advisory board of the 
  $176 million Biomedical Value hedge fund long before Merck withdrew Vioxx 
  in September. It said the fund is run by Great Point Partners of 
  Greenwich, Conn.
  Great Point Partners said it could not immediately comment on the 
  report. (For full story click here.)
  
  The article said the fund had performed strongly, in part by shorting 
  Merck, and in a September 2004 performance summary had praised Topol for 
  highlighting the dangers of Vioxx since 2002.
  Topol said in a statement that the Fortune article had used 
  "innuendos and speculations" to challenge his credibility and that he had 
  no knowledge of any investment by the fund in Merck and never discussed 
  Vioxx with the fund. 
  
  

  Copyright 2004 Reuters All rights reserved. This material may not be 
  published, broadcast, rewritten, or 
  redistributed.


  
  

  

  

  



  
  

  
Find this article at: 
  http://money.cnn.com/2004/12/02/news/fortune500/vioxx_fortune.reut 
  
  



  
  
 

  


  
  SAVE THIS | EMAIL THIS | Close 
  


  
  

  Check the box to include the list of links 
  referenced in the article. 
  

  




  
  

  


  














www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/
A HREF=""ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om


[CTRL] Meteorologist Likens Fear of Global Warming to 'Religious Belief'

2004-12-02 Thread Jim Rarey
-Caveat Lector-



http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewCulture.asp?Page=/Culture/archive/200412/CUL20041202a.html

Meteorologist Likens Fear of Global Warming to 'Religious 
Belief'By Marc 
MoranoCNSNews.com Senior Staff WriterDecember 02, 
2004Washington (CNSNews.com) - An MIT meteorologist Wednesday 
dismissed alarmist fears about human induced global warming as nothing more than 
'religious beliefs.'"Do you believe in global warming? That is a 
religious question. So is the second part: Are you a skeptic or a believer?" 
said Massachusetts Institute of Technology professor Richard Lindzen, in a 
speech to about 100 people at the National Press Club in Washington, 
D.C."Essentially if whatever you are told is alleged to be supported by 
'all scientists,' you don't have to understand [the issue] anymore. You simply 
go back to treating it as a matter of religious belief," Lindzen said. His 
speech was titled, "Climate Alarmism: The Misuse of 'Science'" and was sponsored 
by the free market George C. Marshall Institute. Lindzen is a professor at MIT's 
Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences.Once a person 
becomes a believer of global warming, "you never have to defend this belief 
except to claim that you are supported by all scientists -- except for a handful 
of corrupted heretics," Lindzen added. According to Lindzen, climate 
"alarmists" have been trying to push the idea that there is scientific consensus 
on dire climate change."With respect to science, the assumption behind 
the [alarmist] consensus is science is the source of authority and that 
authority increases with the number of scientists [who agree.] But science is 
not primarily a source of authority. It is a particularly effective approach of 
inquiry and analysis. Skepticism is essential to science -- consensus is 
foreign," Lindzen said. Alarmist predictions of more hurricanes, the 
catastrophic rise in sea levels, the melting of the global poles and even the 
plunge into another ice age are not scientifically supported, Lindzen 
said."It leads to a situation where advocates want us to be afraid, when 
there is no basis for alarm. In response to the fear, they want us to do what 
they want," Lindzen said. Recent reports of a melting polar ice cap were 
dismissed by Lindzen as an example of the media taking advantage of the public's 
"scientific illiteracy." "The thing you have to remember about the 
Arctic is that it is an extremely variable part of the world," Lindzen said. 
"Although there is melting going [on] now, there has been a lot of melting that 
went on in the [19]30s and then there was freezing. So by isolating a section 
... they are essentially taking people's ignorance of the past," he 
added.'Repetition makes people believe'The climate change 
debate has become corrupted by politics, the media and money, according to 
Lindzen."It's a sad story, where you have scientists making meaningless 
or ambiguous statements [about climate change]. They are then taken by advocates 
to the media who translate the statements into alarmist declarations. You then 
have politicians who respond to all of this by giving scientists more money," 
Lindzen said. "Agreement on anything is taken to infer agreement on 
everything. So if you make a statement that you agree that CO2 (carbon dioxide) 
is a greenhouse gas, you agree that the world is coming to an end," he added. 
"There can be little doubt that the language used to convey alarm has 
been sloppy at best," Lindzen said, citing Nazi propagandist Joseph Goebbles and 
his famous observation that even a lie will be believed if enough people repeat 
it. "There is little question that repetition makes people believe things [for] 
which there may be no basis," Lindzen said. He believes the key to 
improving the science of climate change lies in altering the way scientists are 
funded. 'Alarm is the aim' "The research and support for 
research depends on the alarm," Lindzen told CNSNews.com following his 
speech. "The research itself often is very good, but by the time it gets through 
the filter of environmental advocates and the press innocent things begin to 
sound just as though they are the end of the world."The argument is no 
longer what models are correct -- they are not -- but rather whether their 
results are at all possible. One can rarely prove something to be impossible," 
he explained. Lindzen said scientists must be allowed to conclude that 
'we don't have a problem." And if the answer turns out to be 'we don't have a 
problem,' we have to figure out a better reward than cutting off people's 
funding. It's as simple as that," he said. The only consensus that 
Lindzen said exists on the issue of climate change is the impact of the Kyoto 
Protocol, the international treaty to limit greenhouse gases, which the U.S. 
does not support.Kyoto itself will have no discernible effect on global 
warming regardless of what one believes about climate change," Lindzen said. 
"Claims to 

[CTRL] Merck's Vioxx Liability Could Reach $38 Billion

2004-12-04 Thread Jim Rarey
-Caveat Lector-



Merk will probably be acquired by another pharmaceutical in bankruptcy 
triggering golden parachutes for 150 perpetrators,excuse me, I meant executives. 
- JR

http://www.forbes.com/2004/12/03/1203automarketscan13_print.html

FORBESMerck's Vioxx Liability Could Reach $38 
Billion 12.03.04, 2:31 PM ET The legal liability to Merck (nyse: MRK - news - people ) for the withdrawn 
arthritis drug Vioxx could be huge, according to Richard Evans, an analyst at 
Sanford C. Bernstein, who cut his target price to $30 from $33. If all the 
patients who had heart attacks as a result of taking Vioxx were to receive an 
average-sized legal settlement, Evans wrote in a research report, Merck's 
liability could reach $38 billion. That assumes that 58,000 heart attacks could 
be linked to the drug, and that the average settlement would be $650,000. At 
current prices, Evans wrote, the company's share price assumes about $25 billion 
in risk. Evans, who rates Merck at "market perform," cautions that it's not yet 
clear whether trial lawyers can win settlements or at jury, but if they do the 
liability is likely to far exceed his previous estimates. Bernstein or its 
affiliates own 1% of Merck, which is a non-investment banking client of the 
bank.  







  



www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/
A HREF=""ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om


?tax0_SiteID=1JS=False
Description: Binary data


1203automarketscan13.htmlsr=800x600cd=16lg=en-usje=yck=ytz=-5ct=lanhp=ntl=
Description: Binary data


m?ci=us-forbescg=0
Description: Binary data


[CTRL] Vioxx Scandal Opens Door To Drug Safety Pandora's Box

2004-12-05 Thread Jim Rarey
-Caveat Lector-



http://www.healthtalk.ca/vioxx_scandal_12032004_9099.php



  
  
Vioxx "Scandal" Opens Door To Drug Safety 
  Pandora's Box 
  

  December 03, 2004
  When Merck's arthritis drug Vioxx was withdrawn from the 
  market in September, concerns over drug safety were pretty much under the 
  radar for the most part, but not today. Today, the acting head of the Food 
  and Drug Administration, Lester Crawford agreed to meet with a Republican 
  lawmaker intent on getting to the bottom of the Vioxx scandal.
  Republican Sen. Charles Grassley, is concerned that a FDA 
  whistleblower will be punished by his employer, the FDA, for opening a 
  pandora's box.
  


  




  David Graham, the FDA whistleblower, told a 
  Senate Finance Committee that his study earlier this year showed 
  Vioxx increased the risk of heart attacks and strokes, compared to other 
  similar painkillers. However, Graham said he faced intimidation within the 
  FDA when he brought the results of his study to his superiors.
  Graham also told the committee that the FDA was "virtually 
  incapable" of protecting the public from unsafe drugs. He also raised 
  safety concerns over five other drugs on the market which he said could 
  become the next Vioxx. 
  Graham fears the FDA will retaliate by transferring out of 
  the Office of Drug Safety for blowing the whistle. 
  Grassley demanded the FDA respond to the allegations in a 
  letter dated November 29.
  Crawford responded on Friday, indicating he takes all of 
  the Senator's concerns seriously, and agreed to a meeting. "FDA will also continue to use a transparent process 
  that not only respects the rights of all employees but also strives to 
  facilitate a meaningful dialogue between employees at the agency and 
  committee staff," said Crawford in his letter to Senator 
  Grassley.
  
www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/
A HREF=""ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om


[CTRL] IMF: Outsourcing not draining jobs

2004-12-06 Thread Jim Rarey
-Caveat Lector-



This won't help the IMF's credibility. - JR

http://www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/business/10350190.htm?template=contentModules/printstory.jsp




  
  

  


   
  


  

  

  
  


  

  

  
  Posted on Mon, Dec. 06, 2004
  

  

  
IMF: Outsourcing 
not draining jobsBloomberg 
News
The movement of labor to India and other developing nations by 
U.S. corporations has little effect on jobless rates at home, 
International Monetary Fund economists say.
"Even if outsourcing leads to some shedding of labor, the 
increased efficiency could lead to higher production and an 
expansion of employment in other lines of work," IMF economist Mary 
Amiti and Shang-Jin Wei, head of the IMF's trade unit, write in 
Finance and Development, a quarterly in-house magazine.
The percentage of U.S. imports of private services, which 
includes labor outsourcing, from developing countries has grown to 
32 percent in 2002, compared with 28 percent in 1992, the IMF 
said.
Support for free trade among wealthy Americans has eroded on 
concern that opening markets helped trigger the 2.7 million lost 
jobs since George W. Bush took office in January 2001. In 2003, 28 
percent of individuals earning more than $100,000 a year favored 
free trade, compared with 57 percent in 1999, the IMF said, citing a 
University of Maryland 
study.


© 2004 Star-Telegram and wire service sources. All 
Rights Reserved.http://www.dfw.com 
www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/
A HREF=""ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om


<    4   5   6   7   8   9