-Caveat Lector-

------- Forwarded Message Follows -------
Date sent:              Mon, 19 Jul 1999 21:46:26 -0500
From:                   "Jeff Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:                     Reason Express List Member <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject:                Reason-Express: REx29, v2


Welcome to Reason Express, the weekly e-newsletter from Reason
magazine.
Reason Express is written by Washington-based journalist Jeff A.
Taylor
and draws on the ideas and resources of the Reason editorial
staff. For
more information on Reason, visit our Web site at
www.reason.com. Send
your comments about Reason Express to Jeff A. Taylor
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
and Virginia Postrel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).


REASON Express
July 19, 1999
Vol. 2 No. 29


1) Kennedy Mystique or Media Myopia?
2) Latest Take on the Breast-Bottle Debate
3) Encryption: A Threat to Our American Way of Life
4) Report: The Best Teachers Know Their Subjects (Duh!)
5) Quick Hits



- - A Man of Leisure - -

Accepting for the moment that the round-the-clock coverage of John F.
Kennedy Jr.'s mishap was right, proper, and proportional, what does the
coverage tell us about the media?

That news reporters operate with two distinctly different sets of rules:
one for themselves, and people like themselves, and one for everyone else.

The networks, commentators, and editors who assume their fellow citizens
are unequipped to navigate across a slick shower stall, plan for their own
retirement, or hold a pointed stick, fell all over themselves to
understand, accept, and even applaud Kennedy's risk-taking spirit.

Some went so far to label him a "daredevil," citing his parasailing and
Rollerblading excursions. But if Kennedy was a daredevil, then the country
is chock full of them, all willing to assume far greater risks than the
average nightly newscast gives them credit for.

Somehow the mainstream media have managed to misplay one of the greatest
developments of the 20th century, the spread of leisure from a privileged
few to the masses. Think--when was the last time you met someone who
wasn't "into" some particular weekend activity?

In the past 10 years, it has become even harder to miss the proliferation
of ever-more-intense leisure experiences--hang gliding, paintball,
parachuting. mountain biking. These are not the pastimes of the risk
averse.

So perhaps those intent on finding a legacy for the latest fallen Kennedy
should focus on the rehabilitation of an all-too-common epithet:
risktaker.

http://www.abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/kennedyplane990718.html


W. Michael Cox and Richard Alm track the development of leisure in America
at http://www.reason.com/9512/COXfeat.html and
http://www.reason.com/9808/fe.cox.html

Nick Gillespie on the myth of disappearing leisure time
http://www.reason.com/9805/citings.html#9

**************************************************************

- - Pulling A Breast - -

>From the British Medical Journal comes an example of a scientific study
which is less scientific than it appears.

German scientists claim to have found a link between breast milk and the
avoidance of obesity later in life. The results were cited as "powerful
ammunition for the campaign to encourage mothers to choose the breast over
the bottle."

Many studies have shown that breast milk is better than formula on several
counts, but what about this one? Does it really supply "powerful"
evidence?

Over 9,000 children were studied, and the authors did find a correlation
between those who were bottle-fed and those who entered school obese. But
a clear cause was not found. The best the authors could do was suggest
that bottle-fed children are encouraged to finish each and every bottle,
and thus add extra pounds.

But that points to something which even exhaustive surveys on family
background age, income, etc. cannot capture: parenting skills. Could it be
that the breast-fed kids had, on average, better parents?

Such a thing sounds impossible to measure and, of course, doesn't rule out
there being excellent parents who bottle-feed, but a thought experiment
might help.

Suppose we have red Jell-O and green Jell-O, identical in every way except
for color and the process by which it becomes Jell-O. The red Jell-O just
needs warm water. The green Jell-O needs a complicated process requiring a
degree in chemical engineering to produce Jell-O. Any mistakes and the
stuff vaporizes.

Should we be surprised if, five or 10 years on, the kids who ate only
green Jell-O scored higher on standardized tests than those who ate only
red Jell-O? Of course not. And researchers would say they would never let
such an obvious thing slip by them.

But in the breast-bottle arena something very similar happens.
Breast-feeding can be very difficult. It can be painful, highly
inconvenient, and sleep depriving (bottle-fed babies seem to sleep
better). Given these factors, it follows that most mothers who breast-feed
are highly attuned to their child's diet. Breast-feeding moms can be
slackers, but they seem pre-disposed to not be.

Could such a supposition be proven? Probably not without near constant
monitoring of the test subjects. But attempts to single out a single
factor in child rearing should be more than the collection of surveys and
quick computation of the results.

http://www.nando.com/noframes/story/0,2107,71009-112230-796028-0,00.html


*************************************************************

- - Crypto Follies - -

FBI director Louis Freeh spun images of havoc into the heads of members of
the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and got the result he
wanted. That committee voted to keep a hammerlock on private encryption
technology.

Committee chairman Porter J. Goss (R-Fla.) is so far inside Freeh's pocket
that he actually said, "We have an obligation to use that leverage and
that dominance to make sure that the world's terrorists, drug dealers,
weapons merchants and child pornographers can be stopped in their tracks."

Not content with that broadside, Goss let fly with one only slightly less
coherent, "We are not about to subjugate our national security or the
safety of the American people to the constantly changing whims of the
marketplace."

Those dang markets, forever subjugating and endangering on a whim.

The way Goss' committee amended the encryption legislation puts it at odds
with versions passed by other committees, once again underscoring the
FBI's strategy of using key legislative choke points to get its way.

The FBI also won a commitment to fund more code-breaking capabilities for
the national security monolith, already the best in the world.

Interestingly, it is that very capability, as deployed in the Echelon
global eavesdropping system, which continues to cause heartburn in Europe.
A British member of parliament has failed to get a clear response to his
questions concerning just what a U.S. listening post in Menwith Hill
listens to.

Also, in a recent petition for a re-hearing of a key crypto case, the
Justice Department admitted that the object of U.S. export controls on
cryptography is to preserve the ability to intercept communications the
world over.

"The government's foreign intelligence-gathering activities include
signals intelligence (SIGINT), the collection and analysis of information
from foreign electromagnetic signals. The SIGINT capabilities of the
United States can be significantly compromised by the use of encryption,"
the petition argues.

This may sound like an admission of the obvious, but it makes clear that
specific investigations of the bad guys Goss rants about are not what the
widespread use of encryption thwarts. It is the wholesale, real-time
snooping on millions of bits of communications that the feds do not want
to lose.

http://search.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/WPlate/1999-07/16/071l-071699-idx.
html

For background on Echelon in Europe try
http://www.abcnews.go.com/sections/world/DailyNews/Echelon_990709.html

For the full Justice petition try http://jya.com/bernstein-pet.htm

For background on crypto case go to
http://www.eff.org/bernstein/19990621_eff_pressrel.html

Mike Godwin reviews of Neal Stephenson's Cryptonomicon in the latest
Reason, at http://www.reason.com/9908/bk.mg.code.html


*************************************************************

- - Certifiably Better? - -

An important new study on teaching slipped out with little notice, despite
the ongoing frenzy over how to improve public education. Perhaps it is
because the findings do not mesh with the prescriptions of the
professional teaching lobby.

The study found that teachers with emergency credentials--i.e., without
any of the teaching certification clap-trap that so many school districts,
at the insistence of their incumbent teachers, demand--seem to teach kids
just fine.

"Contrary to conventional wisdom, mathematics and science students who
have teachers with emergency credentials do no worse than students whose
teachers have standard teaching credentials, all else being equal," Dan D.
Goldhaber and Dominic J. Brewer concluded in their contribution to "Better
Teachers, Better Schools," a report released by the Thomas B. Fordham
Foundation.

Brewer and Goldhaber found that what was important was having teachers
with a strong background in the subject they teach. This radical
idea--that math teachers should have math backgrounds--is what passes for
unconventional wisdom in the topsy-turvy world of the edu-establishment.

President Clinton called for a ban on emergency certification in his State
of the Union address this year, a reward for teachers' unions which have
backed Democrats so strongly. In May, the administration proposed that
states get four years to scale back emergency certifications.

The Education Department estimates there are about 50,000 teachers
nationwide with emergency certification. The new study did not change the
department's opposition to the practice--it prefers to rely on
seven-year-old data which favors certification.

http://search.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/WPlate/1999-07/15/175l-071599-idx.
html

For more info, including the entire report, go to
http://www.edexcellence.net/better/teachers.html


*************************************************************
QUICK HITS

- - Quote of the Week - -

"I'll do anything to get Hillary into office," Eve Weinstein, wife of
Harvey Weinstein, honcho at Miramax Films, reflecting a fervor for HRC
that is scary--and common in a certain stratum of New York's power elite.

http://search.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/WPlate/1999-07/16/039l-071699-idx.
html


- - Blue Helmets Want Your Money - -

The U.N. floated, then quickly backed away from, an idea to levy a global
e-mail tax to help pay for development in the Third World.

http://www.wired.com/news/news/politics/story/20705.html


- - Tastes Great, Less Explosive - -

China is beset by killer beer bottles, which suddenly explode, sending
shards of glass into victims. The problem is bottles made too thin by
shady bottle-makers, who slide through China's well-greased, rattletrap
justice system. Over 100 have died.

http://www.sunday-times.co.uk/news/pages/tim/99/07/15/timfgnfar01001.html?
1334 425


- - Down! Set! Hut-hut-hut-Deduct! - -

The IRS has ruled that money given to universities for the purpose of
obtaining a skybox at football or basketball games is a charitable
donation to a non-profit entity, and hence is deductible. Play ball!

http://cnnsi.com/football/college/news/1999/07/15/irs_boosters/index.html


- - The Butts Ban, Aflame - -

San Francisco appears ready to get tough with bars that do not comply with
a state ban on smoking. The city sued a bar owner for failure to comply
with the 1995 law.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/1999/07/
14/M N78907.DTL


##############################################################

Reason Express is made possible by a grant from The DBT Group
(http://www.dbtgroup.com), manufacturers of affordable, high-performance
mainframe systems and productivity software.

Current Circulation: 3408
We encourage you to forward Reason Express. If you received this issue
from a forward, please subscribe.


Previous issues of Reason Express are available at
http://www.reason.com/re/re.html

To subscribe to the TEXT version just send a TEXT ONLY message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with this in the body of the message:
subscribe Reason-Express [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For the HTML version the TEXT ONLY message would be:
subscribe Reason-ExpressHTML [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your email and your domain would be something like [EMAIL PROTECTED] To
unsubscribe, use unsubscribe in place of subscribe.


A<>E<>R
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking
new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said
it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your
own reason and your common sense." --Buddha
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
A merely fallen enemy may rise again, but the reconciled
one is truly vanquished. -Johann Christoph Schiller,
                                       German Writer (1759-1805)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
It is preoccupation with possessions, more than anything else, that
prevents us from living freely and nobly. -Bertrand Russell
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Everyone has the right...to seek, receive and impart
information and ideas through any media and regardless
of frontiers."
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will
teach you to keep your mouth shut."
--- Ernest Hemingway
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to